That JD Vance interview with Joe Rogan was pretty good. He came across as really down to earth and relatable.
I'm almost done with it, I agree it was well done. It was more entertaining than useful, he brought up the Retard Right's 300 billion to Iran lie, and covered it, but I think he could of explained it better to the ignorant. Going on Rogan is a really helpful thing because he has a large audience of what I'd consider apolitical or politically ignorant. The kind the Retard Right are probably getting paid a lot to purposefully misinform. Being able to drop a well explain reasonable counter point to audience like that is take helpful. Hopefully he does it again closer to November with a better message on what the administration has been doing
He brought up an interesting point about the Epstein narrative. I frequently rant here about how the government conspiracy is the cover up. They purposefully make up and promote shit like magic bullets, aliens, and steel beams to override the actual malfeasance in public discourse. I believe it's overwhelmingly effective.
I've often said Epstein was the distraction, but that I believe it was distracting from Podesta. He acknowledges that there is nothing in the files, but if there was it was probably destroyed in 2007 with the first investigation with which I concur. However, he made a point about Epstein's involvement in the research/peer review community and how a lot of the censorship of scientific ideas started to end with his arrest/death.
My idea was they were covering child sex crimes, widespread, with teenage sex crimes, personal. Vance seemed to suggest he was involved in some other kind of manipulation/coercion, and his banging high schoolers was spun out into child prostitution/blackmail ring to cover up whatever he actually was doing. I am intrigued by the notion, especially since he was involved with Bill Gates in the years leading up to his death, and Gates has been doing a lot of crooked shit involving science education/media.
I'm worried about Trump's speech ngl, it might work against us.
There is a chance it's completely nothing. There has been a couple times, I remember but not specifically, where a "Big Trump Broadcast" was announced, hyped up, there was a leak about it's topic that was headline grabbing, and then he just bragged about accomplishments in his term.
Either the leaks were purposeful to gain attention and make the News cover Trump patting his back, and/or they were to ferret out leaks. They give specific people/departments a heads up about the speeches contents and you know where leaks are by what the media reports. We did just have investigations over the new Air Force Once, and could be tied to that if we get a nothing burger.
" was kinda funny not gonna lie.
