US Senior Thesis: The Economic Effects of the Ku Klux Klan - Can discriminatory institutions reshape the distribution of economic opportunity across generations?

When the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization, re-emerged in the early half of the 20th century, it significantly reshaped economic opportunity for local Black children in the short term, and its presence continues to perpetuate inequality a century later, according to senior thesis research from Julian Haas ’26.

“What really surprised me was the magnitude of the effects,” said Haas, an economics and mathematics double major. His research demonstrates that discriminatory non-governmental institutions can produce immediate and lasting inequality.

When Haas began reading papers on political economy in his sophomore year, he became interested in a question he felt scholars had not fully answered: Can discriminatory institutions reshape the distribution of economic opportunity across generations?

“I noticed a gap in the literature on institutions. Much of that work focuses on institutions created and enforced by the state,” said Haas. Instead, he aimed to observe the implications of non-state actors: “I was interested in groups outside the formal state that sustain and enforce discriminatory institutions, and whether those institutions can have persistent effects on economic opportunity.”

To find out, Haas traced the Klan’s effects from the early 20th century to the present. He first measured whether the presence of Klan chapters widened racial gaps in white-collar employment, school attendance, and homeownership by using U.S. Census data. He then examined whether childhood exposure to the Klan altered occupational mobility—the probability that a son attained a higher-status occupation than his father—by tracking father-son job data from census records. To determine whether the Klan’s effects persisted into the modern era, he also used contemporary estimates of upward income mobility for children born decades after the second Klan’s decline.

The KKK first began in the 1860s but re-emerged in its most well-known form in 1915 following the release of the film, The Birth of a Nation. Haas estimated the causal effects of childhood Klan exposure on upward occupational mobility by comparing exposure to the film with job status.

In the short run, Haas found that the Klan’s presence widened racial disparities across multiple dimensions of economic progress. In terms of childhood exposure, the KKK reduced upward occupational mobility for Black children by 25 percent and increased mobility for white children by 20 percent.

The short-term findings suggested a redistribution of opportunity away from Black children and toward white children within the same counties. The starkest shift appeared in white-collar employment. Haas found that racial disparities widened most sharply in access to high-skilled, predominantly white-collar occupations, swinging by around 60 percent toward white individuals.

Haas also found that a century after the KKK re-emerged, children born in former Klan counties ranked lower in the national income distribution as adults, regardless of race. “Although in the short run, Black kids lose and white kids win, in the long run, everybody loses,” he explained.

This finding suggested that the short-term gains in mobility and opportunity for white individuals did not persist, indicating the Klan produced long-term disadvantages for all people. “The idea that in the short run, there’s such a large trade-off, and in the long run, everyone does much worse—to me was pretty shocking,” Haas said.

Ultimately, Haas’s main contribution is to show that discriminatory institutions enforced outside the formal state can have persistent effects on economic opportunity. His findings suggest that the long-term effects were as a result of changes in local environments, continued organized Klan activity in the 1960s to now, criminal justice disparities, education, and fertility outcomes for Black individuals within the counties.

In examining the long-term effects of Klan presence, Haas found that the criminal justice system was one important channel through which these effects persisted. He showed that the KKK helped, “fundamentally reshape local environments,” through lasting changes to criminal justice institutions. Even decades after the Klan’s decline, Haas found higher incarceration rates among children born in counties that had hosted Klan chapters.

As his final year at Wesleyan comes to a close, Haas reflected on the unique undergraduate research opportunities the University has provided. “I’m very fortunate to have gone to a place like this where undergrads have such exposure to research the way that we do,” he said.

After graduation, Haas will be working for the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as a two-year research assistant. “This experience definitely solidified the fact that economic research is what I want to do in the future,” he said.

Article Link

Archive
 
Why are you posting some random college kid's paper?
>By Lyla Sneed
...
This is the ""Lyla"" Sneed in question
1320-706-thesis-haas-featured-thumb.jpg
Edit. Apparently lyla is not him and is actually a sheboon
 
Última edición:
He first measured whether the presence of Klan chapters widened racial gaps in white-collar employment, school attendance, and homeownership by using U.S. Census data. He then examined whether childhood exposure to the Klan altered occupational mobility—the probability that a son attained a higher-status occupation than his father—by tracking father-son job data from census records. To determine whether the Klan’s effects persisted into the modern era, he also used contemporary estimates of upward income mobility for children born decades after the second Klan’s decline.
This doesn't make any sense, he's just randomly correlating different things and outright presuming causation
 
I don't even need a college basket weaving degree to know the effects (economic or otherwise) of disproportionate nigger crime on EVERY other race in Americanda.

Iudea Delenda Est.
 
This....is dumb. The Klan re-emerged in the 1910s often in states that were already operating under the Jim Crow system. The existing literature focuses on that reality for good reasons. The reality being that segregation enforced by governments and state/local law enforcement was dramatically more effective than anything the Klan ever did.

His study is also a classic case of correlation without showing causation.

As his final year at Wesleyan comes to a close, Haas reflected on the unique undergraduate research opportunities the University has provided. “I’m very fortunate to have gone to a place like this where undergrads have such exposure to research the way that we do,” he said.

Yes. Wesleyan where Tuition alone is $75k and typical total costs run to $100k per year to go there. The socially conscious author of the paper will undoubtedly be off to wall street after his time at the federal reserve.

Just plain folks.
 
This....is dumb. The Klan re-emerged in the 1910s often in states that were already operating under the Jim Crow system.
This is dumb. The most interesting thing about the 2nd KKK was that it was nationwide, like a third of Indiana's population was KKK, it nearly had political control of Oregon, it was huge in Colorado, huge in Illinois. The 2nd KKK doesn't particularly link to Jim Crow and that's one of the most interesting things about it.

The reality being that segregation enforced by governments and state/local law enforcement was dramatically more effective than anything the Klan ever did.
That'd be devastating to him if his question was "did the KKK matter more than Jim Crow," which by my reading it wasn't.
Put this way, did you know that only like a third of ex-Confederate counties ever had a lynching at all? There's a ton of variation even inside of the South as to how active the KKK was or what their specific Jim Crow laws looked like. Then, on top of that, all the KKK mentioned above in the North and West.

His study is also a classic case of correlation without showing causation.
Did you read the paper? I didn't, but call me crazy but I think a lot of people, especially depending on their level of familiarity with research, just blow things off. There's very little in this world in social sciences that you can easily prove causation for. What's your alternative mechanism?
 
This is dumb. The most interesting thing about the 2nd KKK was that it was nationwide, like a third of Indiana's population was KKK, it nearly had political control of Oregon, it was huge in Colorado, huge in Illinois. The 2nd KKK doesn't particularly link to Jim Crow and that's one of the most interesting things about it.
The interesting thing to me based on what I know about the history of everything is that the KKK was only one such order of various separate groups that all did the same-ish thing and wasn't even the largest in the follow up and aftermath of the Civil War.
 
Did you read the paper? I didn't, but call me crazy but I think a lot of people, especially depending on their level of familiarity with research, just blow things off. There's very little in this world in social sciences that you can easily prove causation for. What's your alternative mechanism?

I have not read the paper. I was drawing conclusions based on the summaries presented in the article. The summaries suggest that he is just doing simple correlation of levels of klan activity to long-term black economic outcomes. I think thats a very flawed approach in total without some sort of careful identification of why that would be happening which would be extremely time-consuming and which I don't get the impression the author did. But being honest I utterly despise the social sciences and their typical methods generally.
 
The interesting thing to me based on what I know about the history of everything is that the KKK was only one such order of various separate groups that all did the same-ish thing and wasn't even the largest in the follow up and aftermath of the Civil War.
I don't know that much about individual orders but it's entirely possible. There was a bunch called Redshirts (you probably already know about htem) in South Carolina that effectively overthrew the government. I think the generic word for it - its how I use it, anyways - is Redeemers, all insurgents and terrorists violetnly overturning Reconstruction were Redeemers.

2nd KKK did something that looks strange only if a person has swallowed school propaganda in that it was building a new American nationalism off of Northern and Southern reapproachment in response to the North having one of its cyclical nativist spasms and the Blacks and Jews (that part was new) swarming in. So you get deliberate mixing of Northern symbolism and Southern symbolism used everywhere: a Rebel flag and an Abe Lincoln portrait in the same hall, for example. The whole thing was devoid of any real character, a lot like the way Nazism would trample over authentic German culture to sell their contrived pagan esoteric bullshit.

3rd KKK was when it finally started narrowing back down to a primarily anti-Black primarily Southern thing.

I have not read the paper. I was drawing conclusions based on the summaries presented in the article. The summaries suggest that he is just doing simple correlation of levels of klan activity to long-term black economic outcomes. I think thats a very flawed approach in total without some sort of careful identification of why that would be happening which would be extremely time-consuming and which I don't get the impression the author did.
I'll read it for you and report back. It actually legit read stuff like this sometimes, so I can see if it passes the sniff test of being done properly (for what it is). Census-linking people is a normal technique. You can always chuck more or less controls in and you can always torture a dataset with bizarre decisions until it says what you want, but then everyone knows what you did.

But being honest I utterly despise the social sciences and their typical methods generally.
Well, there is a real critique of methodologies in any science where you can't run controlled experiments.
 
Well, there is a real critique of methodologies in any science where you can't run controlled experiments.
If it doesn't follow the scientific method then it's not science. I'd call that a pretty serious methodological deficiency when it comes to social "science".
 
Are you talking about Wilmington? B/C that was just a mid-level town that ended up gassing up whites for elections ig
I meant South Carolina but I made it out bigger than I meant to. There was no actual revolution in South Carolina, which is what I accidentally implied. Just a ton of guerilla violence and the govt eventually being replaced like everywhere else.

If it doesn't follow the scientific method then it's not science. I'd call that a pretty serious methodological deficiency when it comes to social "science".
You can’t run a controlled experiment generally. You can look for a natural experiment. You can use inferential statistics to try to make something as close to a natural experiment as you can if you don’t have a natural experiment.

Natural sciences isn’t immune to this either, we can’t make a star to test star formation theories or do likewise with geological formations or climatology or macroevolution. You observe and you deduct from what you do have…
 
You can’t run a controlled experiment generally. You can look for a natural experiment. You can use inferential statistics to try to make something as close to a natural experiment as you can if you don’t have a natural experiment.

Natural sciences isn’t immune to this either, we can’t make a star to test star formation theories or do likewise with geological formations or climatology or macroevolution. You observe and you deduct from what you do have…
We should just have one white supremacist state as a controlled experiment to see how it goes.
 
We should just have one white supremacist state as a controlled experiment to see how it goes.
The biggest thing I can offer, that directly challenges my own favorite historical theory is Ireland. It was basically a full on “extraction colony” like anything in Latin America but is doing way better than even the White “settler colonies” in the Southern Cone.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo