US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Data fusion has been a favorite word of the defense industry since they got computers and started sticking it in shit. Typically it's applied to equipment, like a camera feed from a aircraft getting relayed to a tank. NATO systems have stuff like Link 16 so they can communicate and do that shit.
You know that and I know that but some third worlder seeing anti israel grifters like Gen X Girl on X won't know it and will believe it.
 
Funny, because I’d argue letting illegals abuse the welfare system costs far more than deporting them does lol
This is the inherent problem with Lolbertarianism.
It's cannibalistic and self-defeating.

And I say this as someone with strong libertarian leanings and libertarian values.

Case and point with the illegal welfare and overall tax-funded freebies (i.e. using our infrastructure, services, etc. without paying).
There's an argument to make that stoping the flow of human movement with artificial state borders violates muh NAP, and a true lolbert would never want THE GUVERNMENT to enforce border LAWS!
On the practical reality side, which is more oppressive for the taxpayer who actually has to pay the state theft? That his and her taxes pay for someone who paid nothing and broke the laws to come here and consume our finite resources or to pay for someone to kick that guy out?

I got kicked from a "libertarian" discord server over a big server civil war tier argument about the NAP vs Freedom of Speech.
Basically half the lolberts were saying that refusing to call the Troons women was a violation of the NAP and forcing our thoughts and opinions on someone else. The rest of us were on the boat of "no lol that's a dude, only a statist authoritarian bootlicker would make me call it a "she"." (Unfortunately, yet in hindsight predictably, the mods sided with the tranny) But it just goes to show how libertarian values inevitably come into conflict with each other when real-world application comes into play.
 
Act stupid how????

Don't worry mlang, I have an armed community and am planning on taking womens gun classes :p.
I would actually recommend, more than just online classes a bit, to take NRA/whatever ones. Main thing is, don't ever have the gun in purse.. Know your defense laws, and in the end, screw those when it comes to life or death.

For a guy IWB carry is pretty easly with jeans or a pants (and a good gun belt/hybrid kydex). For a woman you might want a belly bag style, but anyway, fight on.
 
I saw this was something big this morning as the usual FagMcFag illiterate jeets on twitter tried to say Trump staged his own Marineford in Butler, but it shriveled up by this afternoon because anyone who watched it realized she meant it was an inside job by Joepedo's government. Just be prepared when Niggress Owens tries to pivot to this and say Trump took a bullet for her.

SC056.jpg
 
We all know you dream of having the freedom to come out of the closet as JD Vance, but the world's just not ready for that man, it'll hurt your chances in '28
Vance is an Appalachia Man
I'm a Florida Man
we are similar but there are subtle differences, like he probably better comprehends the concepts of "up" and "down" instead of "flat" and "second floor of flat"
 
However, in early 87 ABC put on the mini-series "Amerika", set ten years after a bloodless takeover of the USA by the USSR. Watched some of it, enough to make the blood boil, even knowing there was absolutely no fucking way on God's green earth this could ever happen. The mini-series was shown only once. Believe it may be available on DVD. Bought it on VHS many years ago but just couldn't bring myself to watch it. And as we all know, come the late 80's, we started seeing Communism crumple throughout all Eastern Europe, and at the end of 91 the Soviet Union went away. You had to be there, I guess. I sure was.
Maybe it's because I live in a blue state, but that show looks pretty prescient in 2026. Feral Historian did a bit about a few years ago.
 
You know that and I know that but some third worlder seeing anti israel grifters like Gen X Girl on X won't know it and will believe it.
It scares me how little people know of the military in general. My favorite is how they treated nukes in fiction during the cold war. There were plans to win, even after the bombs dropped. Trillions were spent on projects like Nike and Sprint to hit the nukes, which eventually lead to things like THADD. But the ignorant just thought that the government was going to let the US die without a fight
 
You fuck trannies, i don't want to hear it.

Anyway, ACB is talking about wanting more funding with Kagan for security, and is recounting the threats shes had:

Ver archivo adjunto 9271871
ulF_jJqP6j9ytFvN.mp4
Archive: https://archive.md/3kohb
This woman is compromised emotionally. She should not be in office if she did not anticipate threats being part of the job and such stresses taking a toll on her family.
What so you expect her to say? ‘Everything’s fine. We don’t need security.’ You know Scalia was murdered, right?
 
It scares me how little people know of the military in general. My favorite is how they treated nukes in fiction during the cold war. There were plans to win, even after the bombs dropped. Trillions were spent on projects like Nike and Sprint to hit the nukes, which eventually lead to things like THADD. But the ignorant just thought that the government was going to let the US die without a fight
Nike was against early bombers and would've EMP'd a lot, but maybe stopped the Soviet bombers. The Soviets never had much of a credible bomber threat.

The Sentinel program (which now we have the replacement of Minuteman, whoever've preferred them called Minutemen-4 instead instead of now Sentitnel) was limited to the MRS setup and 2 fields, basically nothing. Moscow still has their goofy ABM stuff.

Look at the UK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevaline system to go against the Moscow alone setup. Moscow and all that area would've had probably 200+ tuned anti-ABM RV's alone, and another 100+ ALCMs and so on. The top to russian cities would've had those.
 
Nike was against early bombers and would've EMP'd a lot, but maybe stopped the Soviet bombers. The Soviets never had much of a credible bomber threat.

The Sentinel program (which now we have the replacement of Minuteman, whoever've preferred them called Minutemen-4 instead instead of now Sentitnel) was limited to the MRS setup and 2 fields, basically nothing. Moscow still has their goofy ABM stuff.

Look at the UK https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevaline system to go against the Moscow alone setup. Moscow and all that area would've had probably 200+ tuned anti-ABM RV's alone, and another 100+ ALCMs and so on. The top to russian cities would've had those.
Nike was anti ballistic when they armed it with the nuclear warhead. You forgot Sprint, which did get fielded for a little bit.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo