Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
USUS Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians
Yeah man I want to live in purgatory where the only reason people aren’t eating my goo is their paycheck and not because we are a people. That’s modernity for you. Choosing the leash over the bullet.
It's far, far better than the alternative, all I can say. Jeets taking jobs, lol. Kinda sucks but you can ride the situation in west europe and USA, for now. If it comes to shooting more than BLM level, which we won't probably get to, people are comfy and lazy, then we'll see.
so I just found this very hilarious, poor ben isent doing so hot views wise
only one video can be described as not objectively flopping and its him candance-posting
keep in mind this is a 7 million subscriber channel
meanwhile Candace
I just think this is a very informative unofficial gallup poll of what people are turning in for. Despite how shizo some of yall think she is she is pulling millions of eyeballs with every stream. Thats almost unprecedented in modern political "journalism" for context at his absoloute biggest Both Asmongold and or Hasan could be expected to top out around 100,000 concurrent live viewers, this was only for the largest of large events that had outside eyeballs coming in.
To regularly pull the high hundreds of thousands to talk about POLITICS? Like it or not both her and Tucker are the largest single voices in the political space right now.
anyway trump sure had a lot to say
also he is just being odd, here is him posting the same thing twice back to back
BUT THEN he gets really wild and posts the ecact same image without a caption twice but a few tweets apart and over 10 hours seperated
I dont mean to cast aspersions on the man but it truly looks like he is forgetting what he has posted, had a buddys dad who had dementia who always was trying to take 2 of his pills cause he never could remeber if he took the first one even though it LITERALLY just happend
wow I found another time he did it within the last 24 hours
Yeah man I want to live in purgatory where the only reason people aren’t eating my goo is their paycheck and not because we are a people. That’s modernity for you. Choosing the leash over the bullet.
I would never normally suggest someone to kill themselves. But... Can it be some sort of mandated this for doomers like this? Apparently it's over and they're athiests anyway
I don't. I've worked hard to get where I am, what little i have to my name. I do want a house in the future, and in the near term, lower rent. I doubt that this bill can deliver that. If it did however, i would be happy as a bird. I'm doing everything right. I'm paying my taxes, i'm paying into my 401k, i'm following the rules. I understand totally why Trump did not sign this and i respect this. Something needs to be done however, even if it doesn't work, because what we're doing right now is fucking ass.
"The system has to force people to behave in ways that are increasingly remote from the natural pattern of human behavior... To make the system work, a massive network of laws, regulations, and compromises is required. The citizens become stakeholders in this network because their own security and welfare depend entirely on its stability. They will actively defend the system against any disruption because a disruption to the technological machine means an immediate disruption to their own livelihood, their food supply, and their survival."
"Eventually a stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in effective control. People won’t be able to just turn the machines off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide."
Whose bullet going what direction for what goal?
Everyone is LARPing. What do you think “society” is besides a contemporary LARP?
"The system has to force people to behave in ways that are increasingly remote from the natural pattern of human behavior... To make the system work, a massive network of laws, regulations, and compromises is required. The citizens become stakeholders in this network because their own security and welfare depend entirely on its stability. They will actively defend the system against any disruption because a disruption to the technological machine means an immediate disruption to their own livelihood, their food supply, and their survival."
You could at least quote the author. Uncle Ted is not exactly a model citizen. He had a terrible personal life, was a vegetarian if i recall, and killed people. Nigga, i care because i have a stake in society. If im paying in, i want something out of it. I doubt this is it, but i hope so.
He's been losing credibility for years, the fact that he's still regularly busting out quintuple digits makes me wonder whose actually watching this junk.
He's been losing credibility for years, the fact that he's still regularly busting out quintuple digits makes me wonder whose actually watching this junk.
Holy fuck that bridge deal is terrible for Canada.
So they get to eat the upkeep costs of the bridge and security while the US basically gets to keep the tolls. How the fuck are the snow-jeets calling that a win?
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is suing Maryland over its illegal and highly dangerous sanctuary policies for lawbreaking foreigners.
Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown in particular has interfered with federal immigration enforcement, according to a July 9 DOJ press release. In spite of federal law prohibiting interference with immigration officers’ activities, Maryland Democrats expend great effort and money in shielding illegal aliens.
Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward explained the suit. “Federal immigration officers merely enforce the laws that our Nation’s elected representatives in Congress passed, reflecting the will of We the People,” he said. “When sanctuary jurisdictions enact laws to shield illegal aliens from federal law enforcement, it is not merely federal law that is violated, but the voices of everyday American voters silenced. Today’s suit proves that this Department will never stand for such lawless action from blue state leaders.”
Maryland authorities stubbornly refuse to honor detainer requests for custody of illegal alien criminals. They will even release the criminals rather than hand them over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). That, of course, as DHS emphasized, puts citizens of the state at risk.
DOJ Civil Division Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate pointed this out. “The American people are ultimately the ones who suffer when states pass these irresponsible sanctuary policies. The Department of Justice will always defend the Constitution and the rule of law, and it does so today by challenging Maryland’s efforts to thwart federal immigration enforcement,” Shumate said.
As mentioned, federal law does strictly prohibit sanctuary policies. For instance, 8 U.S. Code § 1324 punishes those who "knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place."
Furthermore, 18 U.S. Code § 111 penalizes anyone who "forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties."
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has instructed his civil division to look into state and local policies that impede or directly defy federal laws. The Maryland lawsuit is one of many such suits in response to these violations.
I'm just disappointed the Democratic and Republican parties haven't completely annihilated eachother yet. The only way America gets better is if both parties die.
If one party implodes and ceases to exist, the other will naturally split along its center of mass. In some sense you can't have one (in its current form) without the other. One party dying would kill the other, except that the winner will have two successors.
I'd be happy enough with a RINO party and a Patriot party replacing Democrat and Republican.
He's been losing credibility for years, the fact that he's still regularly busting out quintuple digits makes me wonder whose actually watching this junk.
Shapiro is a relic of the period where every conservative pundit had to be a buttoned up, free market loving, credentialed intellectual or they would be tossed out of the social media environment in a heartbeat. This pressure made him the only game in town during a critical time, not because he was particularly insightful, but because he had protection from Zuckerberg and the Tribe.
