Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
People used to not have to specify "biological sex" because no one was trying to claim they were the opposite sex back then. Even with the small amount of transvestites that existed back then, none of them were claiming to LITERALLY be the opposite sex, like modern-day transgender people do. "Marsha" P. Johnson was a drag queen, but now trannies on social media claim him as a "transwoman". The trannies of the past used to be aware of the fact they were just LARPing crossdressers.
Uncle Clarence is such as badass! This is trannies whole game.
“To use language to obscure reality—to show “indifference regarding the truth”— is to lie to the public and cease to treat our fellow citizens “as equal."
Will state that big dumb fat gay Al is missing that the commencement of utilizing 'biological sex' in the '70s...
Which actually was the very late '60s...
Was because it was in the late fucking 1960s that idiots decided that gender was no longer equivalent to biological sex. When fucktards decided to screech that gender's a social construct and is separate from the immutable characteristics of sex, that's when the 'biological sex' clarification became mandatory.
Because fucking gender meant sex since the word came into being from its Old French and Latin origins back in the motherfucking 1300s. It's a very recent development so far as linguistics is concerned that it doesn't.
Shockingly, when you redefine the term for an important concept, people almost immediately create a new term so that they can keep discussing it. It's almost as if Newspeak language games don't change basic reality.
Despite what Al may believe, progressive academics don't have a monopoly on developing politically useful language to advance their ideologies.
Yes, absolutely. CA is not a monolith of hard-core lefties and Truckee is one of those places swept up in policies they want nothing to do with. Now a much smaller, rural athletic community is being uprooted and forced to compete against far larger schools with more resources. And the winter soccer season will result in many forfeitures just due to inclement weather making the commute impossible (on both sides). It's a travesty, and we can hope today's ruling rolls things back.
Bob Shaffer was the Truckee coach up until 2013 when he retired but was tragically killed in a car accident in 2017.
His son Bobby said that Truckee will be played in the Foothill division in the Sac-Joaquin section and apparently it’s a brutal division and he fears Truckee will get crushed by those schools. Another logistical nightmare for Truckee now is to get over Donner Pass which can be brutal during the winter.
Again, all of this is about of a tranny’s temper tantrum when that tranny wasn’t an athlete. All of the hard rock these athletes put in and the legacy the alumni have left is going to be washed away.
I grew up with one of my best friends who’s now the head coach for Fallon and he’s pissed off about Truckee’s situation. He feels for the coaches and athletes.
EDIT: Truckee is officially a legal member of the CIF, California’s high school athletic association, as of today, however due to calendar/scheduling issues they will play Nevada high schools up until 2028.
I find it deeply ironic to hear these retards describe the push back against the trans, so called, community.
In ever instance, what they are describing is exactly how they pushed themselves onto a mostly unsuspecting public, but it's somehow "wrong" when it's done back to them.
There's yet another update regarding Children's Hospital of Colorado refusing to provide care to trans minors. It's important to note, that the hospital contracts with providers from University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine. They are not employees of Children's Colorado. The hospital cannot force any of their physicians to provide care. The hospital states that the providers in question received independent legal advice, and believe that providing this care will put them at serious risk of criminal charges from the Trump administration.
Well, now the parents of these trans kids want the hospital held in contempt of court, saying that the hospital is refusing to provide care to their kids. They want Children's Colorado to be fined $50,000 per day.
Of note: I used to work for this hospital, in the oncology department, which is consistently ranked in the top 10 pediatric oncology clinics in the US. The care that is provided is incredible. Most of their patients receive Colorado Medicaid. If the hospital loses Medicaid funding, I know there are children with cancer that would die. There are studies being run there with investigational drugs that aren't provided anywhere else in the state.
I find it incredibly selfish that these parents are trying to force the hospital to provide blockers and cross-sex hormones for their mentally ill children. If they woke up tomorrow, and their kid had cancer, I expect they'd change their minds.
The hospital cannot force any of their physicians to provide care. The hospital states that the providers in question received independent legal advice, and believe that providing this care will put them at serious risk of criminal charges from the Trump administration.
Uhhhhh yes they did. They EXPLICITLY sad that men are not women.
Even if Fat Dumb Gay Al was right, a stinkditch is not a vagina and moobs are not breasts. Thus, troons do not posses "observed external characteristics."
Alex is arguing that a counterfeit $100 bill and a real $100 bill are the exact same thing and must be treated as the same thing under the law.
We had Barr Body testing since the 50s and the X and Y chromosomes were physically observed in 1905. Now, Barr Body testing isn't infallible, it would register males with XXY Klinefelters the same as XX females, but it was a hell of a lot better than any methods for determining a person's "gender identity" which (for the foreseeable future) consists of asking them.
"It's okay when we do it," Is the #1 rule from their playbook. Still, it points out both the irony and the hypocrisy when they expect to impose themselves on others' safe spaces without pushback and don't believe in reciprocating. That says all that needs to be said about their activism.
EDIT: Truckee is officially a legal member of the CIF, California’s high school athletic association, as of today, however due to calendar/scheduling issues they will play Nevada high schools up until 2028.
I don't want to go too far off on a tangent, but state high school associations will often let schools in remote areas play adjoining state teams with little to no issue. If I recall, Utah has some small high schools in a remote area of the state and they're allowed to play schools from adjoining states (Arizona, New Mexico, etc.) in football. During the COVID years, these schools were also independents that opted out of the state tournament. I don't know if that's still true.
If Truckee is so close enough to the Nevada border it was easier for the CIF to effectively say, "Go ahead and play in Nevada and if you want to opt out of the state post-season, be our guest," that makes sense. Sadly, parents and activists act with only their self-interests in mind and not what works best for the school(s) in question. I've seen parents cause conundrums in both high school and middle school sports because they think they know what's best and either filed or threatened lawsuits to get their way. Sad to see how California's pozzing has led to this, but also nice to see the locals not liking it and wanting to stand up for themselves even if their objections fall on deaf ears.
If Truckee is so close enough to the Nevada border it was easier for the CIF to effectively say, "Go ahead and play in Nevada and if you want to opt out of the state post-season, be our guest," that makes sense. Sadly, parents and activists act with only their self-interests in mind and not what works best for the school(s) in question. I've seen parents cause conundrums in both high school and middle school sports because they think they know what's best and either filed or threatened lawsuits to get their way. Sad to see how California's pozzing has led to this, but also nice to see the locals not liking it and wanting to stand up for themselves even if their objections fall on deaf ears.
The problem is that the CIF wants to place Truckee in a division within the Sac-Joaquin division where the schools have more students and resources. Truckee will get crushed and that football dynasty they build by playing in the NIAA will disappear in the next five years and participation will plummet.
All because a tranny who didn’t play threw a fit about it.
This is surprisingly the only thread on the forum talking about this decision. I haven't seen much crying about it elsewhere either, probably because the immigration decisions that came out the same day are getting more attention. I wish SCOTUS would stagger these decisions so I can enjoy full seething seasons (seethons).
This is surprisingly the only thread on the forum talking about this decision. I haven't seen much crying about it elsewhere either, probably because the immigration decisions that came out the same day are getting more attention. I wish SCOTUS would stagger these decisions so I can enjoy full seething seasons (seethons).
I think pretty much everybody who cared saw the writing on the wall on this decision after oral arguments and already talked about it. A lot more people were deluding themselves about the birthright citizenship thing.
I think pretty much everybody who cared saw the writing on the wall on this decision after oral arguments and already talked about it. A lot more people were deluding themselves about the birthright citizenship thing.
Agreed. I disagree with the birthright ruling but I see the point that the (wrong) reading is so culturally entrenched that only a constitutional amendment can rid us of it. The troon decision and the two immigration decisions were easy rulings because they aren't culturally entrenched at all. They would be recognized as suicidal policies even twenty years ago. Birthright, retarded or not, is the product of legal theory. Open borders and troon shit are the product of making political enemies uncomfortable, any legal theory behind them is post hoc.
If they dissolved the injunction that automatically means that the lawsuit is not "baseless" because one of the injunction factors is likely succes on the merits.
I thought you were supposed to be a lawyer?
"July 8 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Wednesday cleared the way for Florida's Republican attorney general to pursue claims that the American Academy of Pediatrics misled the public about the safety and effectiveness of gender-affirming treatments for minors.
The full 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago overruled, opens new tab a three-judge panel and voted to stay a federal judge's June ruling that had blocked a lawsuit by Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, finding that the suit was aimed at discouraging the group from exercising its free-speech rights.
Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.
Uthmeier's office and the AAP did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The court, which did not explain its decision, also said it would immediately hear Uthmeier's appeal en banc instead of it first being reviewed by the three-judge panel, an unusual move.
Uthmeier sued the AAP and two other groups in Florida state court in December alleging violations of Florida laws banning racketeering and deceptive trade practices. The case is pending.
The complaint accused the organizations of making misleading representations about the safety and reversibility of gender-affirming treatments for minors.
AAP has denied wrongdoing, and in March sued Uthmeier's office in Chicago federal court to block the Florida lawsuit. The group claimed that the state's actions amounted to retaliation and an unlawful attempt to silence groups that support making gender-affirming care more accessible.
Florida's lawsuit is part of a broader nationwide effort to restrict gender-affirming care for minors.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly last month agreed with the AAP, opens new tab, which is based in Illinois, saying Uthmeier's past misleading statements about AAP and the weakness of his office's lawsuit "support an inference of bad faith." The 7th Circuit panel that denied Uthmeier's bid, opens new tab to stay the ruling had said in a 2-1 decision that the case fit into a narrow exception from the general rule, known as Younger abstention, that federal courts must avoid interfering with state court proceedings."
