Culture Lessons From the Graham Platner Disaster

1000004884.png

Hopefully, by the time you read this, Graham Platner will have dropped out of the Senate race in Maine. If he hasn’t, he needs to, immediately.

His campaign, which started with such excitement and inspired so many people in Maine, has become a shameful catastrophe. What’s left — besides finding a Democrat to run in his place — is figuring out what, if anything, can be learned from this debacle.

As you probably know by now, Politico published a story on Monday about a woman, Jenny Racicot, who says that Platner raped her. According to Racicot, they’d been romantically involved, on and off, for more than two years when he showed up at her house drunk and uninvited one night in 2021, let himself in and forced himself on her.

She confided her ordeal to a man she dated after Platner, as well as to her therapist, and showed Politico text messages she sent in 2023 warning an acquaintance away from him. Her account is completely believable and completely devastating.

Platner denies Racicot’s accusations but seems to realize that his campaign may no longer be viable. In a video posted on social media, he said, “Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting, but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we are taking the time to reflect on the best path forward.”

But that time needs to wrap up. According to Maine law, Platner has to drop out by next Monday for Democrats to replace him on the November ballot. The sooner this mess ends, the better.

The Platner campaign represented an electoral insurgency against the Democratic Party; now, there are going to be furious recriminations against those who launched it. There is plenty of blame to go around.

Most at fault, of course, is Platner himself. He allegedly victimized Racicot, and then his campaign victimized her again, putting her into a situation where she felt she had to go public. He betrayed his supporters by plunging into a campaign while knowing he had a closet full of skeletons and drawing people who believed in him into a doomed enterprise.

Maine Democrats were willing to overlook Platner’s Totenkopf tattoo, his terrible Reddit posts and his sexting with other women while he was married because they felt so invigorated by him and the movement he was creating. They went out on a limb for him, and he had every reason to know it was going to be sawed off.

Also liable for this disaster are the progressive operatives who recruited Platner and were so infatuated with his identity — a gruff, handsome oysterman with social democratic politics — that they failed to do their due diligence. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that Platner’s top strategist, Dan Moraff, didn’t want to spring for a thorough background check, which can take weeks and cost around $20,000. “Moraff asked for an expedited, cheaper review to be done within days,” The Journal said.

Moraff, who travels the country trying to recruit left-wing, working-class candidates, reportedly learned about some of Platner’s troubling Reddit posts but decided to charge forward anyway. “Part of our thesis here is that people do not want their candidates grown in vats,” he told The Journal.

He’s correct about the appetite for unconventional candidates, but that is no excuse for such willful sloppiness. Before blithely assuming that voters would forgive a candidate’s flaws, he had a responsibility to try to find out what those flaws were.

This fiasco might seem to vindicate the establishment that Platner railed against, but Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, who wanted to stop Platner, is also partly culpable here. Schumer badly misread the Democratic electorate and tried to clear the field for his preferred candidate, Maine’s 78-year-old governor, Janet Mills, leaving a vacuum that Platner filled.

As NOTUS reported last week, Dan Kleban, a co-founder of Maine Beer Company, had been preparing to launch a populist, anti-Wall Street Senate bid last summer, but the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee tried to dissuade him. “He and his campaign were left with the impression that if he ran, Democrats in Washington would make it difficult because they were holding their support for Maine Gov. Janet Mills,” NOTUS wrote. Kleban ended up delaying the start of his campaign, not getting in until Platner had already caught fire.

While I’m assigning blame, I shouldn’t leave out myself. Last October, when stories about Platner’s tattoo and Reddit posts first broke, I went to Maine to write about him. I tried to convey what I saw: a campaign that was electrifying angry Maine voters. But I deeply regret that, impressed by Platner’s political charisma, I wrote that he was “nothing like the edgelord caricature I encountered online.” If anything, he seems to be significantly worse.

One person who tried to alert Democrats was Platner’s former political director, Genevieve McDonald. She quit when the first Platner scandals emerged and has been increasingly outspoken against him. Progressive operatives made her seem like a vindictive person eager to curry favor with Maine’s political establishment. In retrospect, she looks much more like someone who took a profound professional risk to do the right thing. I can’t be the only one who regrets not taking her more seriously.

If there’s a lesson here, it might be about the importance of listening hard to the people telling you what you don’t want to hear. Many Democrats, disgusted by their party’s failure to contain Donald Trump, want representatives as furious as they are, and they no longer trust their leaders to tell them who is electable. That opens space up for outsider candidates who wouldn’t have had a chance a few years ago. It also makes it easier for unfit characters to escape proper vetting.

Platner offered many on the left something they’re desperate for: working-class aesthetics married to uncompromising lefty politics. Many progressives want to believe that with a sufficiently populist message and style, they can win over voters alienated from the Democratic Party, obviating the need for ideological concessions. Platner seemed to embody this possibility, and that made a lot of people look past a lot of red flags until it was almost too late.

Link / archive
 
Also liable for this disaster are the progressive operatives who recruited Platner and were so infatuated with his identity — a gruff, handsome oysterman with social democratic politics — that they failed to do their due diligence.
Platner offered many on the left something they’re desperate for: working-class aesthetics married to uncompromising lefty politics.
He checked the right boxes so it was worth ignoring all of his baggage, hoping to hoodwink the voters he would represent and the nation as a whole. This isn't presented as absurd or evil, it's merely a "We were so excited to have someone we could say is a white blue collar worker so we could trick white blue collar voters into giving us more power!"
While I’m assigning blame, I shouldn’t leave out myself. Last October, when stories about Platner’s tattoo and Reddit posts first broke, I went to Maine to write about him. I tried to convey what I saw: a campaign that was electrifying angry Maine voters. But I deeply regret that, impressed by Platner’s political charisma, I wrote that he was “nothing like the edgelord caricature I encountered online.” If anything, he seems to be significantly worse.
A sliver of self awareness from Michelle Goldberg that she was ready to run cover for this man. That was the default stance she simply had to take because he was supposed to be one of their own and help secure power. Only when it was clear how unelectable Platner is did she come out and say something.
Michelle Goldberg is not a good person.
 
Can't speak to the other two, but I don't think this is fair to Sam. He's not a southern good ol' boy, but he's spent plenty of time in the New England version of the post-industrial rust belt, and seems to care about the disaffected young men stuck in it.

Nick Rochefort / Scuffed Realtor has probably spent hundreds of hours giving practical advice to young versions of himself.


Reminds me of the SEIU spinning up chapters for Associate Professors of Gay Race Communism. They desperately need to redefine "working class" to mean failson nepobabies with the luxury beliefs of a F500 HR department, because they despise the people & beliefs of the actual working class.

Epic Reddit Bacon HickLibs who know Granpappy fought for trans-kiddie pride parades let them keep up the charade that the REAL working class is obese Dinduishas and gender goblins whose only "work" is declaring disability.

Ver archivo adjunto 9242359

Remember "Beau of the Fifth Column"? Same ya'll, different Current Year.
Ver archivo adjunto 9242373
They’ve been trying to redefine “working class” as the actual American lumpenproletariat for years now. You know, the unemployable activist cows and the illegal migrant underclass that they want to import even more of. While also calling the actual working class people who oppose infinity migrants, $1.50 a gallon gas taxes, climate change as an excuse for over regulation and gay race communism being taught in schools the lumpenproletariat.

It’s more communist word fuckery.
 
It makes sense if it was a kid. When it happened and then coming out later. But I don't believe these people. But. The Democrats do believe in believing all women. So by the logic, Graham Platinum is a dangerous sexual predator. Believe all women when it's a Democrat.
 
Did she go to the police? No? Then fuck her and her accusations. I don't care if she told the mall Santa, it has no weight if it was so terrible of an ordeal that she couldn't even be bothered to tell the cops.

I really don’t think the cops would have done anything. She said she was dating him and the time and she didn’t say he’d beaten her up or anything. She was dating a guy, he came to her house blackout drunk for a booty call (almost certainly not the first time this had happened, but usually he either probably just passed out on the couch or she was into it), she didn’t want to have sex that night, and he was too drunk to take “no” for an answer.

She realized “oh wow, his alcoholism isn’t actually fun or cute and it turns out there’s a very good reason people tell you not to date binge drinking alcoholic men” and then dumped him.

I don’t think I’d have gone to the police in that situation. But importantly, he didn’t beat her. The Republican chick said he had actually beaten her up. Why didn’t SHE go to the police?! I don’t want to downplay the rape thing, but police don’t take that “I was dating him but THIS time I said no” thing seriously, but they’ll almost always take a battered woman with marks on her body seriously.
 
While I’m assigning blame, I shouldn’t leave out myself. Last October, when stories about Platner’s tattoo and Reddit posts first broke, I went to Maine to write about him. I tried to convey what I saw: a campaign that was electrifying angry Maine voters. But I deeply regret that, impressed by Platner’s political charisma, I wrote that he was “nothing like the edgelord caricature I encountered online.” If anything, he seems to be significantly worse.
Most interesting paragraph to me. The writer seems to get most of her news from algorithmic feeds. Once, she did boots-on-the-ground journalism (or as close as she ever got to it) and it contradicted what she had heard.

Now she is apologizing for the one time she did real-life fact-finding, and has pledged to believe what she sees online even harder in the future. Telling!
 
I really don’t think the cops would have done anything. She said she was dating him and the time and she didn’t say he’d beaten her up or anything. She was dating a guy, he came to her house blackout drunk for a booty call (almost certainly not the first time this had happened, but usually he either probably just passed out on the couch or she was into it), she didn’t want to have sex that night, and he was too drunk to take “no” for an answer.

She realized “oh wow, his alcoholism isn’t actually fun or cute and it turns out there’s a very good reason people tell you not to date binge drinking alcoholic men” and then dumped him.

I don’t think I’d have gone to the police in that situation. But importantly, he didn’t beat her. The Republican chick said he had actually beaten her up. Why didn’t SHE go to the police?! I don’t want to downplay the rape thing, but police don’t take that “I was dating him but THIS time I said no” thing seriously, but they’ll almost always take a battered woman with marks on her body seriously.
The important thing would have been the existence of an official paper trail. Not "oh, I told my therapist and friend" twenty years later. Whether or not he did any of this or it's just a political smear job, it is his reputation on the line and just like with the Gorsuch nomination, if that reputation is going to come up, especially if we're talking about rape or unwanted advances or pubic hairs on cans, there needs to be more than just a wink and a "take my word for it. I'm a girl and that means you have to believe me no matter what."*




*Unless I'm saying it against Bill Clinton.
 
The thing I could compare it to were the inexplicable decision in 2024 to make Tim Walz the VP candidate.
Not inexplicable at all. Nobody with even the vaguest whim of future Presidential ambitions wanted anything to do with that ticket. Not that Kamala wanted an actually semi-competent huwite male VP who would overshadow her on the campaign trail anyways. Walz was picked precisely BECAUSE he’s a complete loser. Speculation is that he took it as an opportunity to pre-empt future investigations into Minnesota fraud because it’s muh bad look to investigate your opposition once you get into power, but that clearly didn’t work out for him either.
 
Abandoned by Allies, Platner Faces Pressure to End Senate Campaign

After Graham Platner, the Democratic nominee in Maine, was accused of rape, much of the party and several key supporters turned against him.

1000004887.png

A month after he captured the Democratic Senate nomination in Maine with a fiery populist message, Graham Platner was facing mounting pressure to leave the race after a woman accused him of rape.

The calls for his withdrawal came in rapid-fire succession, from liberal activists who had championed his bid online, crucial early endorsers and the highest-ranking figures in his party.

By Tuesday morning, it was clear the party had turned against him. Officials from the Democratic Senate campaign arm and an aligned super PAC — the most powerful engines of the party’s infrastructure — urged him to withdraw, and top party leaders in Maine called on him to abandon his bid.

“With so much at stake, the best path forward is for Graham Platner to step aside as the Democratic nominee and address these serious allegations outside this Senate race,” said Senator Elizabeth Warren, who had campaigned with Mr. Platner and championed his bid.

Her withdrawal of support was a major blow to Mr. Platner, underscoring how even the left wing of the party was pulling away from him.

In a private call with his campaign staff on Monday evening, Mr. Platner did not announce plans to withdraw but implied such a decision would be coming, according to three people familiar with the conversation. He said that he believed he still had leverage to influence which candidate would replace him on the ticket and wanted to ensure that the movement his campaign had built would continue, the people said.

Control of the Senate could very well rest on Maine, which offers Democrats one of their best chances of winning a Republican-held seat this fall. Senator Susan Collins, the Republican incumbent, is seeking re-election in a state that former Vice President Kamala Harris won by seven percentage points in 2024.

But she is also a seasoned incumbent who has dashed Democrats’ dreams for three decades. With Republicans holding 53 seats, Democrats must defend all the seats they hold and flip four more to win control in November.

In Maine, the Democratic Party faces a hard deadline to figure out how to deal with the chaos created by Monday’s allegation: Mr. Platner has until July 13 to withdraw from the race. If he does, the state Democratic Party has until July 27 to replace him on the ticket, according to Maine state law.

It’s unclear how much leverage Mr. Platner, who has battled a series of controversies throughout his nearly yearlong campaign, may have. The leaders of the Maine Democratic Party — not national officials — are taking the lead on structuring the process for selecting a new nominee, should Mr. Platner withdraw, according to a person familiar with the discussions.

Already, Democratic activists, officials and potential candidates have begun lobbying for replacements. Several candidates are being mentioned as early possibilities, including Shenna Bellows, Maine’s secretary of state; Troy Jackson, a former president of the Maine Senate; Nirav Shah, a former director of Maine’s public health agency; and Jordan Wood, who lost a primary for a House district in northern Maine.

There’s no official process for selecting a new nominee, but top Maine Democratic officials have already begun discussing possible plans. Those could include hosting a pop-up convention or holding a statewide caucus to effectively redo the party’s primary election, according to two people who have talked with the officials and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal party conversations.

Mr. Platner built a movement-like campaign in the state, rallying Democratic primary voters around a populist economic message. But even before the rape allegation, which was reported by Politico and which Mr. Platner denies, there were signs that the steady drumbeat of controversies had hurt his candidacy.

A recent New York Times/Portland Press Herald/Siena poll found Mr. Platner locked in a neck-and-neck race with Ms. Collins. His support lagged behind the percentage of likely voters who said they would like to see Democrats control the Senate next year, a signal to some in his party that a candidate with less political baggage could be in a meaningfully stronger position.

An oysterman who has never held elected office, Mr. Platner has been dogged by controversies since he announced his bid last August, including allegations about his past treatment of women, revelations of a tattoo he had that resembled a Nazi symbol and a trove of offensive online posts he made over more than a decade.

In June, The New York Times published accounts from three women who were in romantic relationships with Mr. Platner for years. They said he could be demeaning to women and, in at least one case, even physically threatening.

One of those women, Jenny Racicot, went further in interviews with CNN and Politico on Monday, accusing him of sexual assault. She decided to go public with more detailed allegations, she told Politico, after a different woman who spoke with The Times was dismissed by some because of her conservative politics.

Concerns about Mr. Platner’s interactions with women reached the highest levels of his campaign months before the women came forward in The Times with their accounts.

Last August, Mr. Platner’s wife, Amy Gertner, told a senior campaign aide that he had been exchanging sexual messages with other women. Mr. Platner’s exchanges with women were confirmed to The Times by current and former campaign officials.

But the latest charge from Ms. Racicot appeared to be too much for many Democrats, including some who had previously been among the strongest voices dismissing concerns about his background and character.

Several hosts of “Pod Save America,” a popular liberal podcast, who testified to Mr. Platner’s “decent” character through a series of his controversies, called for him to step down. Prominent Democratic endorsers, including Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Representative Ro Khanna of California raced to withdraw their support.

Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the country’s largest abortion rights organization, which had recently rallied with Mr. Platner, also rescinded its endorsement.

Others sounded vindicated.

“Graham Platner’s behavior is disqualifying (AS WE HAVE SAID THIS WHOLE DAMN TIME) and he should end his campaign,” Emily’s List, a Democratic group that backs female candidates who support abortion rights, said in a post on social media.

In recent weeks, there were signs that Mr. Platner was struggling to keep pace in the contest. He had emerged as one of his party’s most powerful online fund-raisers this election cycle, but he was being dramatically outspent by Ms. Collins and her allies, who had already poured millions into attack ads against him. His campaign and Democratic allies were set to be outspent by 2 to 1 on advertising through Election Day, according to data from the media tracking firm AdImpact.

Behind the scenes, Mr. Platner was struggling to win support from rich donors. Some worried about what damaging information from his past might next emerge, according to people familiar with private conversations.

In interviews and private meetings, Mr. Platner insisted there would be no more damaging revelations to come.

Link
 
While I get the skepticism for believe women or whatever it's called now, Platner is different. He's not some established professional with a clean record hit with sudden and convenient accusations. He's a wannabe politician with a history of red flags that were well known before hand. The only reason people are "turning" on him now is the recent polls from Maine have him down significantly and while having ties to a sex pest senator is acceptable, having ties to a failed senator sex pest is not acceptable. If he had any serious chance to win all the people calling him to drop out would still be supporting him.
 
The exact same fucking people went from that to "how DARE you suggest there is anything amiss with our h*ckin chungus totenkopf tattooed rapist blackwater mercenary candidate! have you not heard how much he hates Israel and the zionist occupied government?!"
Don’t even need to go back that far. The same people frothing at the mouth because Elon Musk made an awkward arm gesture now say there’s nothing to see about their guy who has a literal Nazi tattoo.
 
Did she go to the police? No? Then fuck her and her accusations. I don't care if she told the mall Santa, it has no weight if it was so terrible of an ordeal that she couldn't even be bothered to tell the cops.
Exactly. It's far too easy for women to make false accusations and face no repercussions. Somehow it's too traumatic and and embarrassing to tell the police about a crime, but it's perfectly ok to blab about it on social media, or to a journalist who won't investigate any of the facts. Going to criminal court risks giving a woman PTSD because she has to relive her trauma, while filing a case in civil court is liberating.

Some women have made their careers as professional victims. At this point, no one should believe a claim of abuse without a mountain of evidence.
 
Última edición:
Don’t even need to go back that far. The same people frothing at the mouth because Elon Musk made an awkward arm gesture now say there’s nothing to see about their guy who has a literal Nazi tattoo.
Remember when Sydney Sweeney was the literal hitler of the day because she made a commercial for american eagle because like america bad and eagles nazi and stuff?
 
Exactly. It's far to easy for women to make false accusations and face no repercussions. Somehow it's too traumatic and and embarrassing to tell the police about a crime, but it's perfectly ok to blab about it on social media, or to a journalist who won't investigate any of the facts. Going to criminal court risks giving a woman PTSD because she has to relive her trauma, while filing a case in civil court is liberating.

Some women have made their careers as professional victims. At this point, no one should believe a claim of abuse without a mountain of evidence.
What is the alternative?

Most rape cases are "he says, she says" and our justice system chooses to believe the woman.

Solid Evidence for consent or lackthere off don't exist.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo