Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

It's been a hundred years since I've seen or read any Harry Potter anything, so I'm not exactly sure what happened with Umbridge and the centaurs, but how fucked is it that the "woke" party is happier with Umbridge probably being killed by centaurs rather than raped and left to live another day? Better dead than red raped??
Also how is it proof she hates women? Like molly weasely being such a strong duelist that she can kill Bellatrix lestrange in one on one combat after she took out 3 men including a werewolf? So two of the strongest side characters are both women... Doesn't that imply the opposite? Not to mention Hermione is lot smarter in the books than the movies. No I think she just hates hr Karens. Which everyone hates hr Karens. Almost like Umbridge was designed to be hated for how she acts like an authoritarian cunt despite having effectively a mediocre school principal job. Also let's not forget Harry's mother is so important to the story she literally saves Harry from the brink of death from birth all the way to the finale. With it being hinted at that Voldemort taking in Harry's blood in goblet of fire actually is what saved Harry in deathly hallows. But sure, because she hates hr karens like everyone else she must hate all women.
This is what I meant with the troons mimicking 'female pettiness' to go after an old women earlier as well btw. It was a joke at how these retards act like all women are like Umbridge. If they can't pass as women on the outside they'll act like petty Karens instead. Since they can't pass they go wumbo Karen. But they don't realize Rowling is a billionaire with money coming in from all over. Also correct me if I'm wrong. But isn't Rowling the most well known example of a person who went from starving brokie to billionaire? I remember growing up that she wrote the first book while struggling with no heat during the winter and on welfare to afford beans and weenies for her kids. Basically as close to being homeless without being homeless. So she went up from near the bottom of society to top of society from writing for kids. These troons always try to argue that nobody can go from rage to riches in capitalism, but J.K. Rowling literally did. I guess another reason they hate her is she keeps proving them wrong.

Ultimately people hate Rowling because she's successful and they're not. Rowling created Harry Potter for her kids and other kids all liked it. They created 50 shades of bdsm fanfiction and Twilight breaking dawn of the 9000 year old 12 year old vampires.
 
Almost like Umbridge was designed to be hated for how she acts like an authoritarian cunt despite having effectively a mediocre school principal job
That's the thing; she wrote a horrible bitch-ass cunt, then made her female. It's not that she hates women, she hates that one person who HAPPENS to be a woman. If she'd made Umbridge a guy nobody would say shit.
 
It's just black and white autist thinking plus grasping at straws. It's as dumb as saying she hates men because some of the villains are men.
 
It's been a hundred years since I've seen or read any Harry Potter anything, so I'm not exactly sure what happened with Umbridge and the centaurs, but how fucked is it that the "woke" party is happier with Umbridge probably being killed by centaurs rather than raped and left to live another day? Better dead than red raped??
I always just assumed they beat her up. Getting the shit kicked out of you can be very traumatizing especially if you don't really expect it to happen. If she were GRRM absolutely but JKR imply rape? Her critics need some lessons on media literacy.
 
I always just assumed they beat her up. Getting the shit kicked out of you can be very traumatizing especially if you don't really expect it to happen. If she were GRRM absolutely but JKR imply rape? Her critics need some lessons on media literacy.
According to Google, she is tried for her crimes (torture, endangering children, etc) and sentenced to Azkaban for life after voldemorts fall.

I dont recall if this is explicitly mentioned in the books but she definitely isn't killed by the centaurs.
Not sure what the rape numbers look like in Azkaban, but having a dementor do a little sucky suck on the soul might be worse.
 
According to Google, she is tried for her crimes (torture, endangering children, etc) and sentenced to Azkaban for life after voldemorts fall.

I dont recall if this is explicitly mentioned in the books but she definitely isn't killed by the centaurs.
Not sure what the rape numbers look like in Azkaban, but having a dementor do a little sucky suck on the soul might be worse.
Hermione and Harry lead her into the forest to show her a "secret weapon". Then centaurs show up, she insults them and they carry her off.
Dumbledore somehow gets her back later, she is in the hospital wing and I think Ron trolls her by making clip-clop sounds like hooves, which freaks her out.
The rape thing was just based on the idea that centaurs supposedly were rapey in mythology and that Umbridge appeared to be traumatized, but there is nothing in the HP universe that suggests they would ever rape anyone.
 
The rape thing was just based on the idea that centaurs supposedly were rapey in mythology and that Umbridge appeared to be traumatized, but there is nothing in the HP universe that suggests they would ever rape anyone.
Again, their minds are in the gutter. And desperately reaching for proof that JK is evil.
 
Hermione and Harry lead her into the forest to show her a "secret weapon". Then centaurs show up, she insults them and they carry her off.
Dumbledore somehow gets her back later, she is in the hospital wing and I think Ron trolls her by making clip-clop sounds like hooves, which freaks her out.
The rape thing was just based on the idea that centaurs supposedly were rapey in mythology and that Umbridge appeared to be traumatized, but there is nothing in the HP universe that suggests they would ever rape anyone.
its basically a human centipede of early 10s consoomer coomerbrain and tumblr degeneracy that eventually made its way to cracked.com and thus became enshrined as a reddit tier "100% TRUE GUIZ" factoid to be perpetually brought up and recycled by those lacking in personality, and from there was repurposed as another cudgel in the holy war against the terf slutbitchwhore supreme in order to prove how she is literally six million gamergates multiplied by late stage capitalism. Many such cases.

Naturally, the fact that centaurs had already been introduced and characterised in book 1 as grumpy and isolationist at worst, not to mention the idea that the oft declared muh-raysiss wizarding world would tolerate a herd of savage rape monsters right next to their only school is questionable to say the least, never really gets talked about in these circles
 
Última edición:
but there is nothing in the HP universe that suggests they would ever rape anyone.
HP is a series for children and young readers. Why would JK imply that Centaur gangrape happened??

Trannies are degenerate freaks who are buying giant animal penis dildos so of course the first thing they think about is that the Centaurs raped Umbridge.
 
People on this thread are starting to overthink this. Trannies are either born to be sexual deviants, or they literally wank their brains out to become sexual deviants

Pic below applies in 99% of cases

HMisnDiWwAAnPeT.jpeg
 
The rape thing was just based on the idea that centaurs supposedly were rapey in mythology
Don't the trannies know that like...everything in almost every mythology was kinda rapey?
Not to give them ammo or anything, but the entirety of Greek mythology essentially reads like the ye-olde Epstien Files

You've got dudes fucking their moms, dudes transforming into animals to fuck ladies, gods fucking mortals (which is essentially pedophilia with a touch of bestiality) and tons more

Also, I know im very off topic here in general, but Ive always found it amusing that the alphabet people used the caveat of 'but the Greeks were buggering each other!' as if thats some kind of win.

Like, yeah? Its still gross and gay? Am I supposed to be okay with child sacrifice too? Just because some other ancient cultures used to do it doesn't make it a positive thing.
 
The Harry Potter books don't even have any sexually explicit content in them. There's absolutely no reason to think Rowling snuck in centaur gang rape fetish fodder in book 5. The closest thing you get to sexual content is Harry kissing Cho Chang and later Ginny, which is a far cry from what troons include in their own books and would definitely like to be able to freely include in children's literature.
 
Don't the trannies know that like...everything in almost every mythology was kinda rapey?
Not to give them ammo or anything, but the entirety of Greek mythology essentially reads like the ye-olde Epstien Files
Wow you are so behind the times!
Don't you know that Persephone wanted to be with her uncle!

Demter wasn't a mother trying to keep her daughter safe in a world that wanted to hurt her. She was an over bearing mother who didn't want her daughter to spread her wings.

All those statues, paintings, books saying other wise are wrong. This musical written 2000+ years after our lord and saviour said so.

HP is a series for children and young readers. Why would JK imply that Centaur gangrape happened??

Trannies are degenerate freaks who are buying giant animal penis dildos so of course the first thing they think about is that the Centaurs raped Umbridge.
This was the ancient RDS. They hated her books for not being edgy enough so they kept trying to find ways to make the story more "adult" to mess with her younger fans on the internet. It was really gross.
 
The Harry Potter books don't even have any sexually explicit content in them. There's absolutely no reason to think Rowling snuck in centaur gang rape fetish fodder in book 5. The closest thing you get to sexual content is Harry kissing Cho Chang and later Ginny, which is a far cry from what troons include in their own books and would definitely like to be able to freely include in children's literature.
(And Aberforth Dumbledore who does inappropriate things to goats.)
 
PTerry would be pro-trans, there is no dispute imo. He wrote the whole female dwarf coming out story after all. (Because all dwarves, even females have beards so it's very problematic or something.) Very schizo take, but disguised in the fact that he was fundamentally writing the equivalent of novel shitpost on fantasy genres.
Pratchett's female dwarves are a well-crafted universal critique of sex roles created with zero consideration of trannies. He used an absurd fantasy world conceit to satirize the arbitrary treatment of women divorced from any real-world culture, so readers from anywhere can see what he's getting at wrt women without having to address any specific cultural things IRL that in context aren't discrimination.
It's like in the Simpsons where Kodos is all mad that her brother doesn't want her in the kitchen hosting a dinner party because females are supposed to be out of the house conquering planets and leading armies.* It sounds like you haven't read any of the Witches' books if you think lady dwarves have something to do with troons.
*edit-this is ACTUALLY from one of the comics, not a TV episode.
 
Última edición:
He used an absurd fantasy world conceit to satirize the arbitrary treatment of women divorced from any real-world culture, so readers from anywhere can see what he's getting at wrt women without having to address any specific cultural things IRL that in context aren't discrimination.
Yeah, I'm not sure that the guy who wrote Monsterous Regiment would be all for modern troons. At worst, I suspect he'd be a sort of good natured liberal about it: mtfs are just sad, ultra gay men, and we should be kind to them. I don't know how long that would last in the face of modern trans culture, but he died before that happened, and probably wasn't cognizant for all but the very beginning of it, so I don't think we'll ever know.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo