Culture ‘Idiocracy’ Tops NYT Poll as the “Definitive Movie That Represents America at 250 Years”

More than 3000 readers responded to a New York Times poll asking which film best captures the American experience, offering hundreds of titles, most of them classics. While opinions varied widely, there was a clear, and unusual, winner.

Mike Judge’s 2006 satire “Idiocracy” received more mentions than any other film. Many readers described it as an accurate depiction of modern America, with several commenting that it has become less a comedy than a documentary.

Yes, the film where a professional wrestler-turned-president named Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho fires a machine gun into the air while declaring war on “problem” crops, where hospitals use energy drinks for medicine, where courtroom proceedings are replaced by chaotic shouting matches, and where basic language itself has deteriorated into simplified slang, is what now represents America in its 250th birthday.

The film imagines a society where anti-intellectualism has become normalized, education has collapsed, and corporations dominate public life to the point that basic services are branded, monetized, and aggressively dumbed down. That Judge’s “Idiocracy” has become the most-cited answer in a major poll about the definitive American film says less about the movie’s literal predictions and more about the current cultural mood.

Judge’s low-budget satire underperformed upon release in 2006 and was largely ignored by its studio. Nearly two decades later, however, audiences have increasingly embraced it.

Interestingly, Judge has made two films that were largely shrugged off when they first came out, but are now widely seen as cult classics. “Office Space” (1999) is the other. A modest performer on release and initially treated as a niche comedy, it has since taken on a second life as a defining portrait of corporate burnout and soulless office work.

Behind “Idiocracy” in the New York Times poll were “The Godfather,” “Easy Rider,” “American Graffiti,” and “Do the Right Thing,” each praised for exploring different aspects of the American experience. Other frequently cited films included “Network,” “The Grapes of Wrath,” “To Kill a Mockingbird,” and “Dr. Strangelove.”

Yet, “Idiocracy” towered above them all. This says as much about the lens through which some Americans currently view the country as it does about the movie itself.

 
They've said this thousands of times now. The movie is overrated anyway outside of a few scenes, and the main one that comes to mind describes leftists well
 
The "Idiocracy is a documentary" quip got old, quickly. It was always the normienigger morons who cranked out that tiresome observation in every damn comment section for every damn clip of the movie, patting themselves on the back in awe of their own rapier wit. Aside from Terry Crews (who stole every scene he was in, really the movie should have been his) and the above clip-which really does describe liberals more accurately than it does conservatives-there's really no reason to watch it.
 
Última edición:
I think Idiocracy is a great movie. Terry Crews stole the show and the death truck driver being named "Beef Supreme" will never not be funny to me. What gets irritating is all the liberals who say it's prophetic but ignore the very beginning of the movie which explicitly mocks them. Their kind literally go extinct because they spend all their time working for corporations (which go on to destroy the planet), bicker with partners they resent and demean, and never have children.

The movie also directly advocates for genetics-based IQ and, in a way, eugenics. Liberals generally have this weird position about intelligence where it's only genetic and heritable when it's them or people they hate, but never anyone else.
 
"Idiocracy is really a documentary" got old, quickly. It was always the normienigger morons who cranked out that tiresome observation in every damn comment section for every damn clip of the movie, patting themselves on the back in awe of their own rapier wit. Aside from Terry Crews and the above clip-which really does describe liberals more accurately than it does conservatives-there's really no reason to watch it.
those aren't normies those are pajeet bots saar
 
I believe the movie is prophetic in the sense of the browning of the first world. Mountains of garbage everywhere, horrifying water mismanagement due to incompetence (we are seeing this in California, the lost paradise), advanced technology barely able to be maintained and operated by the current denizens. In short some flavor of third world shitheap, india mostly.

This is the more optimistic outlook for post great replacement countries, for places falling to invasion by Africans and muzzies please see other media for a more accurate depiction (Elysium, dawn of the dead, halo 3 ODST).

One part of the movie that stuck out to me was the people who actually had their lives together held off on having kids due to either economic uncertainty or being overworked while the undesirables continuously reproduced without ceasing, sound familiar? If not maybe you need to spend some time at the quality learing center.
 
So, the NYT readers view America at 250 as a society that has elected the smartest man in the world to be President?

Judge's satire is libertarian leaning, skeptical of bureaucracy, skeptical of corporations, and skeptical of PC culture. NYT readers exist in many characters of the week in King of the Hill.

Honestly though, I've rewatched Office Space and Idiocracy recently and I feel like they are now out of the zone when they are aging well. It could be that I've just watched them both too many times, but Idiocracy in particular felt kind of empty. It's time to find some new movies.
 
The real problem isn't retards who act retarded, its retards who think they're intelligent. They're the kind of people who vote in NYT polls while smugly chuckling to themselves about the same trite garbage you've heard a million times like "Idiocracy wasn't supposed to be a documentary". At least typical retards are amusing and know their place, where as these subtards have never had an inane take they couldn't shut the fuck up about.
 
something you aren't allowed to say today
In the US, you can say whatever you want, unless you're too much of a pussy to say it.

its retards who think they're intelligent
Unlike the geniuses who elected an unqualified, uneducated, materialistic dipshit as a county-level school superintendent in Arizona?

(And, yes, she used that heavily-photoshopped headshot everywhere.)

Arizona (a Republican state): Where Education is Last!
 
Unlike the geniuses who elected an unqualified, uneducated, materialistic dipshit as a county-level school superintendent in Arizona?

(And, yes, she used that heavily-photoshopped headshot everywhere.)

Arizona (a Republican state): Where Education is Last!
I agree that teachers are dumb and suck at educating, but I didn't expect to hear that from someone like you.
1783275359112.png
 
Oh good so I'm sure all the liberals calling it prophetic are ready to start having kids in order to prevent the prophecy from coming true? No? OK then...
At the end they have a mulatto child, who becomes the smartest child in the world.
One thing I've noticed is that in Idiocracy they were able to say black ghetto trash are low-IQ, something you aren't allowed to say today.
Most of the characters were white trash.
 
Most of the characters aside from the main character (savior of human civilization) is a brown mystery meat retard.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo