Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

[Tragi-Chan]

Do you think the transgender community edge closer and closer to commiting treason against the English Crown every passing day?

They seethe over everything and everyone. Seething is all that gives their movement a sense of purpose. I think you’d have a hard time naming an influential person that they don’t hate.

IMO, there’s a bit of hipster cred in being the first to identify a transphobe and initiate the pile-on. Everyone knows Rowling is Actual Hitler, but did you know that [ACTOR] is friends with [ACTOR WHO HAD MINOR ROLE IN THE HARRY POTTER AUDIOBOOKS]?

Interesting that people like this don't commend Charles for divorcing Diana. I thought they had an issue with 'problematic age gaps'? They were 20 and 32 when they got married. Social media discourse would've led me to believe he did the right thing in calling things off and dating a woman his own age?

A lot of troons have no problem with “age gaps” if you know what I mean.

 

[Requine.]

They seethe over everything and everyone. Seething is all that gives their movement a sense of purpose. I think you’d have a hard time naming an influential person that they don’t hate.

IMO, there’s a bit of hipster cred in being the first to identify a transphobe and initiate the pile-on. Everyone knows Rowling is Actual Hitler, but did you know that [ACTOR] is friends with [ACTOR WHO HAD MINOR ROLE IN THE HARRY POTTER AUDIOBOOKS]?

A lot of troons have no problem with “age gaps” if you know what I mean

It's less a purpose, and more a tool. Decades ago, if someone came out as a troon people's reaction, at worst, was, "Okay, whatever, weird looking fella. Have a nice day!" And that was it.

They had to make up discrimination, and human rights violations, and generally larp being prosecuted so that they can get more attention. Making themselves disgruntled gets them that attention and doing perverted shit, then posting about it. Then when people start hating them for this behavior specifically, they pretend at vindication. They were obviously right that people hated them from the start.

Even now, the people that set them off the most are "ignorant." The kind of person that says, "Ohh, sorry, sir. The man's bathroom is down that way." And, "I don't think dysphoric men in dresses should be allowed to rape women in homeless shelters."

 

[ten dollars off]

God, Rowling is such a MILF.

 

[Candidate No 7]

It's so funny that Diana is now a semi-legendary figure from an age lost and people have no recollection what she was like (nice but dim and quite phony).

 

[The Hungry African]

The amount of hate this woman gets just because she thinks men do not belong in women's bathrooms (and spaces) continue to astound me. She has morphed into the figurative devil of the troon left religion.

I agree. She should be getting hate for enabling and supporting the raping of 250 000 biological British females.

 

[LateNightMuffin]

Whenever this thread (or any other decent thread) gets featured, I count the days till the tourists leave.

 

[Gaystapo]

I agree. She should be getting hate for enabling and supporting the raping of 250 000 biological British females.

 

[FinnSven]

At the time it was viewed more as an outreach to AIDS patients. The idea that gays were some significantly reviled minority in the 80s and 90s (to the extent AIDS patients were) is a relatively niche idea that only gained significant traction in the past few years and certainly wasn't a widespread thought at the time itself outside of maybe the activists. .

Gays were generally mocked and tabloids ran hit pieces on outed celebrities, but they were certainly not reviled.

Wealthy gays were expected to keep quiet about it, instead styling themselves as ”confirmed batchelors”.

Unless they made being gay their primary career, Julian Clairy for instance.

It certainly wasn’t a general revulsion, perhaps a bit of uncomfortable sentiment, but miles away from Jim Crow or Aparthied.

 

[Magic Pickle]

Whenever this thread (or any other decent thread) gets featured, I count the days till the tourists leave.

Well, as long as there are guests, it's impolite not to set out some tea and cakes, so hopefully this Reddit seething will help.

This post on r/transgenderUK sits modestly at just roughly under 200 comments and includes the thread-featured photo of Rowling and the Queen (so I won't repost that to prevent repetition since by now we've all already seen it). There's a lot of insistence on what they believe Diana would do or believe that seems awfully presumptuous to assume of a dead woman who had no access to any sort of oracles despite having the privilege of being royalty!
Link | Archive

So royal family posted this pic and had to limit comments on IG.​

Spoiler: Lots of mold jokes for some reason, too.

[–]AutumnGoGoGoat
Diana would have supported trans people

[–]SeeyouonTotherside​

Absolutely and they killed her off​

[–]StinkyBird64​

100%.​

I think conspiracies are always dumb and stupid but by GOD they absolutely bunked her off, no doubt in my mind.​

[–]ArsErratia
The weird thing is if anything they should know better than anyone that LGBT+ people have existed throughout history. How many Gay Princes have their been in the lineage?
We're sitting here going "maybe some of these people in the historical record might have identified with modern labels, if they were born today, but you have to be careful". Meanwhile they can open Burke's Peerage and go "oh yeah, he was gay, they were non-binary, she was a lesbian, we had to arrange a loveless marriage for that one to avoid a war with Spain, oh his antics caused two completely different succession crises..."
If there was one institution that should be LGBT+ friendly, it should be The Crown. They know full well that at some point in the future they'll have a gay prince, and at some point they'll have a trans prince. And they're the ones who are going to have to deal with it when it comes.

[–]Several-Succotash939
She just looks evil. She doesn’t seem capable of smiling, only smirking. I guess it’s plastic surgery and botox, but the way she looks at the camera feels almost menacing

[–]SeeyouonTotherside​

She actually looks incredibly sad, likes she dying inside​

​

[–]sammi_8601​

Well yes if all you do is hate your gonna be sad, it's not a pleasant existence. I love that for her.​

​

[–]Yeahnahthatscool​

If that's true the outside needs to hurry the fuck up and match it.​

​

[–]selvmutiilation_​

its the mold symbiotes inside her lungs​

​

[–]SortNo4068​

I'm honestly tired of the mo*u*ld jokes. There wasn't mould, it was just a low res view of ugly wallpaper. Blaming mould attributes her behaviour to an external cause rather than to her own choices. She's just evil, no mould needed.​

​

[–]breadcreature​

god, this. black mould doesn't make millionaire bigots living in castles turn evil, it gives people living in slumlord rental properties chronic health problems. even if it really was that, she could choose to not live with the evil mould any time.​

[–]DorisWildthyme
Diana wouldn't have done anything like this.

[–]Niriun​

Diana woulda thrown hands​

​

[–]flyingfoxtrot_​

I just know she's fucking seething up there​

[–]FluffyTomorrow2815
All that Botox and her face still looks like it’s melting off. That grimace she calls a smile is what happens when hate becomes your entire personality.

[–]Purple_monkfish
I mean, are we surprised? This IS the same royal family who supported their nonce family member and only took action to strip him of titles and lands because of pressure from the general public.
Scum tends to cluster together.

​

[–]Far-Statistician625​

in fairness before that i know there were a few statements but no "evidence in the eyes of the law" which honestly is bs because witnesses can be evidence but i know that i wouldn't want to believe my brother or dad or something was a nonce without solid proof so idk​

[–]Anthropic_Principles
She's not aged well.

[–]museical_of_time​

Hate dose that to people​

[–]EldritchMilk_
This doesn’t change anything about my opinion of either of them, i despise even the concept of royalty and I’m confident everyone here shares my hatred for the wicked witch of the west

[–]Motor_Net6337​

Don't drag Elphaba into this, you mean the mouldy maid of the mad.​

[–]SamanthaJaneyCake
The hag can’t even get trousers to suit her lmao.

[–]Super7Position7
RK Jowling looks dead behind the eyes.
Camilla actually looks good by comparison. Weird.

[–]RetsyRetsy
God she’s fucking hideous isn’t she

[–]Jess3200
If any TERF complains about cancel culture again, can we just collectively respond by posting this picture of one of them meeting with literal fucking royalty?

[–]No_Clock8929
I know it's pathetic to make bitchy comments but what is it about these TERFs and massive foreheads? JKK my dear you seriously need a little visit to Facial Team to sort out your hairline. Judge me and I shall judge you back.
Seriously, I also agree that it was incredibly stupid of the queen to publish this photo during pride month and I'm seriously proud of everyone who overloaded the page with comments.

[–]Financial-Radio4089
would now be a bad time to admit that until very recently I had assumed Camilla was a trans woman? no idea why but that was what I thought for most of my life.

But now that we've had a glimpse at what they've had to say on their home turf, let's see how things unfolded on the TERF turf that is r/unitedkingdom! (This post has over a thousand comments, so I'm only highlighting a select few; you'll all have to do your own cherry-picking if you want to read the war-torn battlefield of this comment section in full detail, I'm afraid. Please forgive me.)
Link | Archive

Queen Camilla blasted as ‘deplorable’ for posting photo with J.K. Rowling at palace during Pride Month​

Spoiler: Did you know once in a blue moon, Redditors can be based?

[–]TheEnglishNorwegian
I can't imagine she will give a shit about a minority of people kicking up a fuss online.

[–]Thetonn​

'Charles, I am being horrendously cyberbullied, order another crate of booze to help me cope'​

[–]ChaBeezy
JK Rowling who is literally a UK industry on her own, a working class woman who is a genuine British success story
But the queen should ignore her because people on twitter with profile pictures of anime cat humans.
Okay

[–]LycanIndarys
I really think this sort of outrage does more damage than it is trying to prevent. The Queen met with Rowling to talk about the importance of reading for young people. Something that I'm sure we can all agree is a worthy goal.
Rowling single-handedly managed to get an entire generation reading, and then talking about those books. She is by far and away the most prominent children's author of the past century, with perhaps her only competition being Julia Donaldson. If you look at the list of best-selling books, she's in fourth place with the first Harry Potter book. And if you scroll down to book series, she's in first place by a long way.
Simply from the number of book sales; she's earned a place alongside Shakespeare, Dickens, Christie, and Austen when it comes to discussing English literature.
So of course she's part of the conversation that the Royal Family are trying to cultivate. All the outrage does is put people off from engaging with her critics, because they come across as angry lunatics, shouting at anyone that dares to disagree with them.

[–]speccynerd
"Why choose someone based on achievements? They should be chosen based on identity politics."
Don't you see how asinine that argument is?

[–]Altruistic_Fruit2345​

This isn't identity politics. This is human rights.​

​

[–]DucDeBellune​

Choosing to skip over the UK’s biggest children’s author on a discussion related to reading would 100% be identity politics bullshit, get real.​

​

[–]NoticingThing​

"Why not pick an LGBT author instead?"​

"This isn't identity politics."​

Alright mate, whatever you say.​

[–]fletcheros
Blasted by who? Some dickheads online? Oh no!!! What will she do!!!!

[–]BeeOnYouAt
Damn Redditors really love to hate on a strong uncompromising woman.

[–]Sensitive-Pace9952
I'm loving this this thread. A small minority of terminally online redditors in faux outrage, meets the sane reality of the rest of the world. JK Rowling is, and always has been, right.

[–]Makaveli2020
The trans community has said a lot worse to this woman than J.K. Rowling ever has.

[–]BonzoTheBoss
I doubt that the queen even knows about Rowling's "controversy."
From her perspective, "queen takes picture with world-famous author."
And to be honest, the only people who really care about Rowling's views are the chronically online to begin with.

[–]Opening_Sandwich242
Wow - the first thing Camilla has done that I can admire her for. JK Rowling has done so much to protect women and girls, quite apart from her amazing literary legacy, she is absolutely a national treasure and I would love to be lucky enough to meet her. She is not anti trans, just pro women.

Oh, and just for fun, here is a post from r/EnoughJKRowling which claims - in jest, of course - that this is the "unedited, original" photo of the two women together.

(I don't post much from r/EnoughJKRowling because it's honestly shooting fish in a barrel in terms of Rowling Derangement Syndrome, but as a treat for those of you who haven't seen what the sub has to offer, I'll leave this post comparing her to Rudyard Kipling to whet your whistles.)
Link | Archive

In the competition of which Problematic Children's Author materially contributed the most to concrete, societal-scale harm against marginalized populations (as opposed to Problematic Children's Authors who abused individuals, like Gaiman and possibly also Barrie and/or Carroll)​

J. K. Rowling would have stiff competition in the form of Rudyard Kipling
But on the other hand my impression is that Kipling, even as an active colonizer in a bloodsoaked empire, bore a lot less obsessive personal malice toward Asian and African colonial subjects than Rowling bears toward trans people (and has the added benefit of having been dead for 90 orientalist, orientalist years)
If you asked Kipling his opinions on trans people in particular, I get the feeling he'd find the whole concept delightfully quaint and write some twee poem exoticizing Eastern "ladyboys" and "eunuchs" or hailing the heroic exploits of "women who dressed up as men"

 

[Big White Bwana]

The idea that gays were some significantly reviled minority in the 80s and 90s (to the extent AIDS patients were) is a relatively niche idea.

I beg to differ.
Maybe they were celebrated by some middle-class twats, but the general public had no sympathy for them.
Any headway gays made for acceptance in the 1970s was completely negated by the arrival of AIDS.
While we are on the subject of Lady Diana Spencer, there was a line in the BBC comedy: "Only Fools and Horses", where one character is warned against experimenting with homosexuality, or he would "end up shakin' hands with Lady Di"...

 

[The Starcard]

Uh oh.

Ver archivo adjunto 9212961


Ver archivo adjunto 9212975Ver archivo adjunto 9212976

Ver archivo adjunto 9213370

Muh Diana!

Ver archivo adjunto 9213387

Ver archivo adjunto 9213389

Rule Britannia, truly!

 

[who dare wins?]

But on the other hand my impression is that Kipling, even as an active colonizer in a bloodsoaked empire, bore a lot less obsessive personal malice toward Asian and African colonial subjects than Rowling bears toward trans people (and has the added benefit of having been dead for 90 orientalist, orientalist years)

At this rate they might start to say King Leopold the II was actually a very benevolent violent racist who likely would’ve supported trans people and hated Africans less than JK Rowling.

Meanwhile they can open Burke's Peerage and go "oh yeah, he was gay, they were non-binary, she was a lesbian, we had to arrange a loveless marriage for that one to avoid a war with Spain, oh his antics caused two completely different succession crises..."
If there was one institution that should be LGBT+ friendly, it should be The Crown

I would like to know which exact monarchs this is and how many of these cases were pederasty involved. Completely ridiculous claim to make.

 

[Gaystapo]

People coming to this thread to accuse Rowling of being a man-hater are retarded. Rowling is 60 years old, and what she considers "feminism" is probably far different than what a 20 year old blue-hair person considers "feminism". I'm not a feminist/meninist (gender war spergery is retarded), but I haven't seen any actual "man hate" takes from her. I don't think she'd make her book's protagonist a man if she hated men.

She was/is definitely a standard liberal (aside from the tranny shit), and I think she's only recently realizing migrants are a problem. This gay ass purity spiral shit about how "she's not based enough" is dumb. It's a good thing that a famous multimillionaire is going against troons in a time where most others like her bow down to the girlcock to make more money.

Edit: "Leftism is a slippery slope to how we got here" is a good critique of her (and of all leftists). But there's no point to REE-ing whenever she does anything good against trannies. Nor do I think she's going to call for full male genocide after she's done "genociding" troons. Hardly anyone was sperging out on the Mullvad thread about the Mullvad owner supporting a leftist party that just happens to be anti-migrant (it's not actually an "ALT-RIGHT NAZI PARTY" like troons claimed it to be). I don't understand why there's purity spirals on this thread when there wasn't on the Mullvad thread. Mullvad owner: leftist who is anti-migrant, Rowling: leftist who is anti-tranny. Leftism is cancer, but people can change, and Rowling seems like she is especially open to changing her opinions over time.

 

[VargReallyDidNothingWrong]

Moore clearly preferred the masculine-yet-gentlemanly adventurers of the imperial era like Quatermain and Bulldog Drummond.

Big talk coming from a guy who looks like a homeless man, got cuckolded by a woman and thinks he's a literal wizard who can cast spells.

Muh Diana!

"The Royal Family doesn't give me any money for my titty skittles THIS IS LITERAL GENOCIDE!!"

 

[crowabunga]

This is the funniest purity spiral shit, and the worst part is that even if it's only a subset of trannies it isn't a purely online phenomenon: I've overheard MtFs and FtMs bitch about Rowling IRL.

Keep the seethe coming, queen, if I hear someone hyperventilating over you then I know they're too unstable to merit acquaintance.

 

[teriyakiburns]

I'll leave this post comparing her to Rudyard Kipling to whet your whistles.

These people haven't understood kipling. They probably only know him from gunga din (which they haven't read) and white man's burden (which they only know from all the screeds written against it). In Kipling's time, a man in a dress was a homosexual, or an actor (but I repeat myself), and was an unremarkable degenerate in either case. He certainly wouldn't have considered them "quaint". His only mention of eunuchs is Rimmon, where they are portrayed as part of a barbaric and primitive religious rite.

 

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

God, Rowling is such a MILF.

Degenerate or Gold Digger I dunno which is worse.

 

[lowkeyl0ki]

Uh oh.

Ver archivo adjunto 9212961


Ver archivo adjunto 9212975Ver archivo adjunto 9212976

Ver archivo adjunto 9213370

Muh Diana!

Ver archivo adjunto 9213387

Ver archivo adjunto 9213389

Niggas need to cope harder.

 

[AnthonyLoggerhead]

Interesting that people like this don't commend Charles for divorcing Diana. I thought they had an issue with 'problematic age gaps'? They were 20 and 32 when they got married. Social media discourse would've led me to believe he did the right thing in calling things off and dating a woman his own age?

The average tranny relationship is a 28 year old ‘dating’ a 14 year old, so I don’t think they have a problem with age gaps

 

[PixarsTedKennedy]

Big talk coming from a guy who looks like a homeless man, got cuckolded by a woman and thinks he's a literal wizard who can cast spells.

Didn't he also draw CP?