Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.
Lol USPG2 MAGAloids are seething at the birthright citizenship thing. They still think brown people are why they are unemployed losers that live on welfare and not because they are just horrible people with zero skills
Dude that was years ago. Miggers are like niggers but even worse. Trump could've appointed her the day before she voted on this - and they'd still pretend she just magically appeared in the supreme court and wasn't appointed by Trump.
His whole schtick is to appoint people who will do the opposite of what he says he wants so he can pretend his hands are tied while getting the shit done he actually wants done. He's been using this playbook since the very first year he took office and it continues to work on his completely retarded followers.
The most repeated defense of his first term is that the swamp had his hands tied - completely ignoring the very real fact that he appointed the swamp that "tied his hands."
Jews only own America because you keep slapping the worlds biggest for sale sign on the white house lawn. You have let decades of American politicians turn your once beautiful republic into a African banana state while you instead complain about people who are taking advantage of the environment you yourselves created. At this point America is just a $10 whore with a line of countries waiting their turn to fuck her. Maybe once Israel, China, India and Saudi Arabia are all done, me and all the other African lads will have a crack at what ever is left.
I am for deporting Ben Shapiro back to Israel or to conscript him to fight the IRGC in the pond of Hormoooz. He can join the Battalion Ladybug with Baron and Lindsey Gayham.
After another leftist primary victory, miggers are begging establishment democrats to join King Pedo's harem
It makes sense since a lot of these democrats are AIPAC-owned fossils like Donnie https://x.com/rightwingdude72/status/2072138289449157017
I am for deporting Ben Shapiro back to Israel or to conscript him to fight the IRGC in the pond of Hormoooz. He can join the Battalion Ladybug with Baron and Lindsey Gayham.
Ben Shapiro is who I point to when people complain about antisemitism being on the rise. If he was alive in 1935 Nazi propaganda would just be his videos on repeat.
I read the guy's article but will keep this fairly short. He argues in favor of unimportant and irrelevant points such as weakening Iran's military and nuclear program ((((forever)))), giving the US military practice, getting the energy market to lower its prices, and (most importantly I believe) that the US can simply attack Iran again if the MoU and final deal fall-through and Iran continues its nuclear program. He minimizes Iran's threat to the Strait of Hormuz and downplays the possible value that the $300 billion plan may provide.
None of the researchers or analysts I typically read from have made any claims that the war was already "won" or "lost" since the war hasn't even ended. Most write about how the deals are unfavorable for the US and favorable for Iran. None of the agreements have been fully implemented and his argument relies on the belief that the agreements will fail and nether country will even implement the MoU or final deal. He has a long history of screaming about the Iranian nuclear threat and how amazing the US is, so this isn't surprising. Instead of looking at the current situation and coming to a conclusion, he's trying to change the situation to fit his previous arguments, in complete opposition to most other analysts, researchers, professors, and writers.
How does the CIA always come across as both the most cunning and most utterly incompetent secret organization in existence? Like what the fuck are they even trying to achieve?
I never understand this point. Forgive me if I am wrong, but the main threat of Iran was never that it was going to over-run the Middle East and US allies with their superior armed forces and re-establish the Persian empire. It was more that they were an economic nexus for providing support to America's enemies. They provided drone and weapon manufacturing for China, Russia and North Korea. They funded proxies in the region and terror cells across the world. The only threat that was "dealt" with is that Iran has lost a majority of its ballistic missile launch sites but still has a majority of its missile stockpile.
A cash infusion is the worst possible move if you want to de-fang Iran. Not only is the US giving them 300 billion but also lifting the sanctions and possibly allowing them to charge a toll on the strait, which is another source of cash flow. Iran has a large population, a highly educated population and some of the largest oil reserves in the world. The US has caused friction with its allies, shown it cannot/is not willing to protect the region, lost billions of dollars, and tanked its and the world's economy all for Iran to have very ephemeral setbacks and to be given the keys to mind-blowing wealth. Wealth that can be used to do all the things that made them a threat but on an even grander scale.
*Car rolls up to a sub-urban house
*Two uniformed military officers exit and walk to the door of the house
*They knock
"Im sorry to say ma'am but your son was killed in the line of action. You can be rest assured that he died for a noble cause; the US got a lot of practice, the energy markets went down in price and we stopped a nuclear program for the second time after it was destroyed last year but also was weeks away from completion in the 90's"
Ben Shapiro is who I point to when people complain about antisemitism being on the rise. If he was alive in 1935 Nazi propaganda would just be his videos on repeat.
I point to Ben Shapiro as an example of a talentless loser who only found success because of the culture war grift.
But then, people can't see him, because he's so bloody short.
Edit:
I would like to formally apologise to the sharty threads and all the soyteen niggers that post there. You guys have way funnier features.
How does the CIA always come across as both the most cunning and most utterly incompetent secret organization in existence? Like what the fuck are they even trying to achieve?
Because mixed in with the Hannibal Lecter level sociopaths is a bunch of frat boys who say things like "Wait, wouldn't it be, like, really funny if we rubbed the DOORKNOBS with LSD! That'd, like, be CRAZY!"
Forgive me if I am wrong, but the main threat of Iran was never that it was going to over-run the Middle East and US allies with their superior armed forces and re-establish the Persian empire. It was more that they were an economic nexus for providing support to America's enemies. They provided drone and weapon manufacturing for China, Russia and North Korea. They funded proxies in the region and terror cells across the world. The only threat that was "dealt" with is that Iran has lost a majority of its ballistic missile launch sites but still has a majority of its missile stockpile.
You are not wrong; you are completely correct. That argument is disfavored by researchers and analysts who prioritize strategic goals over operational effects. Focusing on how many soldiers were killed, ships obliterated, and missile launchers destroyed ignores the main points that Iran can recover from those problems and whether those effects achieve strategic goals. Iran didn't surrender, and it's the US that is making concessions, so does it actually matter if the Iranian military was severely damaged when that didn't guarantee a US strategic victory?
A cash infusion is the worst possible move if you want to de-fang Iran. Not only is the US giving them 300 billion but also lifting the sanctions and possibly allowing them to charge a toll on the strait, which is another source of cash flow. Iran has a large population, a highly educated population and some of the largest oil reserves in the world. The US has caused friction with its allies, shown it cannot/is not willing to protect the region, lost billions of dollars, and tanked its and the world's economy all for Iran to have very ephemeral setbacks and to be given the keys to mind-blowing wealth. Wealth that can be used to do all the things that made them a threat but on an even grander scale.
There is also nothing in the MoU that limits the Iranian military or Hezbollah in any capacity (and I highly doubt there would be any in the final deal). Iran needs time and money to rebuild its military capacity, and a peace agreement gives Iran time, and the $300 billion plan and sanctions removal give Iran money. Iran is constantly threatening the other Gulf states to turn against the US and work with Iran, and there's evidence to suggest Iran's efforts are having positive effects in Iran's favor at the moment.
The American people will be more opposed to another war against Iran given all the issues the US suffered as a result of Trump's first war. So, if the MoU or final deal is not implemented, or if negotiations fail, the idea that the US can just attack again falls flat. If we couldn't defeat Iran the first time after completely destroying everything Iran has, why should anyone expect us to succeed the second time? Are we going to assassinate another dozen of Iran's leaders, blow up already destroyed factories, sink already sunken ships, and bury already buried missile launch sites?
This is another one of those places where economic illiteracy leads people to draw bad conclusions. I guarantee you that miggers will defend this on the grounds that the money will (I'm just assuming, I have no confidence in Trump to do anything properly) be earmarked for civilian use, not understanding that if you give people money and tell them to spend it only on X that doesn't mean they won't just spend less of their own money on X and use the savings for more Y.
Unless the US is going to garrison (read: invade and occupy) Iran to enforce demilitarization, some of that money WILL go into rearmament.
I get why Tucker Carlson was so insistent on making Ted Cruz say the population of Iran. I think a huge chunk of Americans have no clue that Iran is loosely comparable to Iraq and Afghanistan combined in size, or put another way, is a third-ish the size of the US, geographically vast and extremely mountainous.
