US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Generation X was gutted by abortion, but it's worse going forward, it sort of stacks on top of each other a little bit. say 1/3 of x is gone, that means that there are less gen y kids to even abort their babies.. and the ones that are alive (2/3) 1/3 of them are aborting their babies.. and on and on..

Is it any wonder the birth rate is crashing out?
It's all because of the Warren court. Had to make sure the boomers could get away with being drug addicted sex maniacs in the 60s to lock in their vote forever. And now we're onboarding all these browns, because spoilers, man was not meant to play God, and we've fucked ourselves.
 
Generation X was gutted by abortion, but it's worse going forward, it sort of stacks on top of each other a little bit. say 1/3 of x is gone, that means that there are less gen y kids to even abort their babies.. and the ones that are alive (2/3) 1/3 of them are aborting their babies.. and on and on..

Is it any wonder the birth rate is crashing out?



Can you not pick up on the idea no one gives a shit about what faggotry your dyke ass is vomiting up, we are talking about the abject horror people like you have wrought on the rest of us.

Just hush lady, adults are talking.
birth rate is crashing among blacks due to abortion, among white people it's mostly economic issues. hispanics have kids because of religion/culture
 
Feminism is a political position, though. Pointing out your political position is not a "personal discussion".
And even if it were, check the URL. The website you're on is entirely centered around personal discussions. Retard.
Outside of purely academic exercise, there isn't really a reason to believe that someone's philosophy is somehow divorced from their personal motivations even if they are apparently at odds. Logic and reason aren't necessarily synonymous.
 
House passes digital ID legislation. (archive doesn't seem to work)
The House passed a sprawling package of kids online safety bills Monday night, marking the first time a version of the landmark Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) made it out of the lower chamber.

The House passed the Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act in a 267-117 vote, with 47 members not voting.

The package, taken from portions of 14 digital safety bills, was brought to the floor Monday under a fast-track process called suspension of the rules, which requires two-thirds majority support for passage.

It now heads to the Senate, where it will face an uphill battle over the House’s changes made to KOSA and other provisions. The bill includes provisions on age verification, AI chatbots, data protections and raising awareness about drug sales on social media.

Its passage comes just one week after House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) announced the KIDS package received new support from ranking member Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), months after negotiations first fell apart between the two parties.

The bipartisan deal notably still eliminated KOSA’s duty of care provision, which would have legally required platforms to “exercise reasonable care” to prevent harms to minors. Harms include eating disorders, suicide, substance use disorders and sexual exploitation.

Tech watchdog and parent advocate groups, along with KOSA Senate co-authors Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) argue the duty of care provision is the most important part of KOSA.

Blumenthal said last week that the House version of KOSA is “dead in the Senate,” though Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chair of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, told reporters last week he is open to negotiations with the lower chamber.

This is not the first time the House and Senate have disagreed on KOSA or the duty of care provision.

Lawmakers introduced KOSA four times in as many years, and while it passed the Senate easily in 2024, House Republicans’ concerns over censorship and freedom of speech prevented it from ever hitting the House floor.

The package also includes provisions seeking to limit the addictive nature of social media, give parents tools to monitor their kids’ online experiences, create new guardrails for AI chatbots, regulate direct messaging on social media and require age verification for adult websites.

It also would implement new requirements for data brokers’ handling of kids’ data, along with updating the existing Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) to expand privacy protections.

Guthrie, speaking on the House floor earlier Monday, said the committee “worked hard to reach a workable compromise.”

“While no single bill will solve every challenge facing families online, this legislation represents a significant and long-overdue step forward in establishing meaningful safeguards,” Guthrie said. “It is an important milestone-not a finish line-in the effort to better protect children online and hold bad actors accountable.”

In the upper chamber, Blackburn is in separate negotiations with the White House over a deal that could include the Senate version of KOSA.

The White House, according to two sources familiar with discussions, told a handful of tech and policy organizations earlier this month that the package could also include the House’s version of the App Store Accountability Act and language on preemption of some state laws.

Blackburn’s No Fakes Act, a bill to protect artists from AI impersonation, is also expected to be included, another source close to negotiations with the White House told The Hill.
The future of the free Internet is non-existent.
 
Generation X was gutted by abortion, but it's worse going forward, it sort of stacks on top of each other a little bit. say 1/3 of x is gone, that means that there are less gen y kids to even abort their babies.. and the ones that are alive (2/3) 1/3 of them are aborting their babies.. and on and on..
Is it any wonder the birth rate is crashing out?
It feels like everyone suddenly cares about birthrate now because we're being told we need more people as an excuse to import more third worlders.
This is after they kept telling us we had too many people on Earth and were overpopulated.

Population growth always followed a logistic growth pattern, with non whites they would reproduce till they hit carrying capacity and people died, for whites they generally "felt" when they were about to hit perceived carrying capacity and then would self regulate their birth rates rather than death rates leveling out. I'm assuming this is probably because if you overproduced kids in environments with harsh winters, you would fuck yourself over and higher IQ allowed for better future planning.
logistic.PNG

The people who get abortions, are generally low IQ and low impulse control, they're not the type of people you want reproducing anyway.
abortionsbyrace.PNG
Who is more likely to get an abortion, a progressive, black, hispanic, or a white conservative? Not saying you should kill babies but doing the moral thing means dealing with a sudden influx of nonwhites and retards or people raised by retards and the system won't sort itself out because they're artificially propped up by infinite welfare. If you cut off welfare those retards will still have 9 kids, but 7 of them will die. I'm not sure this is any better a solution. Honestly, as long as there is Evil in the world there will never be an entirely "moral" solution, either you let the children of retards die when they dont support them, let retards self abort, or you artificially prop up retards till you hit carrying capacity and they die anyway.
Maybe we needed those white retards though, we used to have plenty of manufacturing and farm jobs that could have used them, in which case they could have 9 kids and support them with a factory job and things would be fine because you NEED 9 (non violent white) retards (who are actually relatively smart compared to foreigners and blacks). In which case we need to bring manufacturing back here so we can support the influx of tards. You still have to deal with the retarded non-whites who would usually get abortions not getting them anymore but nobody seems ready to fix that. In the end I don't think the general population is ready for the solutions we need in general and specifically if we wanted to get rid of abortion.

We can't have a system that requires exponential growth, hell we can't have a system that requires LINEAR growth because population will always follow a logistic growth pattern, the only time it doesn't is when you zoom in too close on the logistic graph. If the higher ups want more population growth, they should encourage high IQ and high future planning people into having kids, obviously this won't happen because they want to replace the population, not encourage its growth. Long term you need a system which doesn't depend on infinite growth and can sustain itself, or you need to become infinitely technologically innovative, which again won't happen if your population is full of third worlders and retards.
 
Última edición:
Derp. What does that have to do with how the Supreme Court operates? Which is the information I posted.
Nothing at all, which is why your whining about "personal discussions" was directly in response to him calling you a feminist.
IMG_0906.jpeg
"She is also a feminist" is the entirety of the post you were responding to. So if that's not the personal attack you were referring to, then show me what was.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo