US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
So what? Hitler's all-in Jewsperg autism ended well for him and Germany, right?
Only because le Judeo Christians moved heaven and earth just to make Weimar Worldwide.

“They didn’t bend over and gape for rabbis - not like us Christians!” isn’t the dunk you think it is. Take a look around you, guy who thought the Trojan Horse would really tie his room together.
 
He’s
yes they have but we've seen trump's real thoughts on proles like us. I live in PA and whenever our gov posts about raising the minimum wage, a bunch of Daniel Fluger's chime in about how "businesses can't afford to be paying people too much" I am happy to see them beat and I hope Trump's influence is positive but I question it still

I am not trying to write a freshman polemic here but it is definitely something to consider. there is still a lot of self hating cuckery among average red state voters here. join a union!
The boomer mentality right there. They just want slaves.
 
So what? Hitler's all-in Jewsperg autism ended well for him and Germany, right?
The biggest criticism I can levy against Hitler as a leader is that when it came time to pay the Piper, he sold the youth and thus the future of Germany down the river. Even if WW2 didn't happen, his fiscal policy had Germany set for a collapse by about 1949. If anything the War bailed him out in that respect, even though he didn't live to see it. But, like every leader that suffered the same fate, his biggest crime was losing. That really is the ultimate, and most often sole, method of judging a leader.
I suppose it is easy to get lost in the weeds when discussing this stuff, as I am more focused on what constitutes the West without malign influences, but it is of course the foremost concern to preserve something to save to begin with and that will not happen if decisive action against the floods of various browns aren't taken.
Sitch's law. Most arguments are arguments about definitions, you just don't realize it. It was exemplified during our entire disagreement, and it's another reason we don't have as many enemies as we may think.
 
the top wnba player is a straight white catholic woman so she keeps getting attacked by her black lesbian opponents
She needs to find herself a reliable, discreet group of white men to corner and beat these niggers to within an inch of their lives to send a message. It's the only language they understand, and they won't stop attacking her until someone starts speaking it to them.
 
The D.C. Court of Appeals threw out the firearm conviction of a Black man named Donte Carter, ruling that police unlawfully seized him. The court determined that a reasonable Black man in D.C. would not have felt free to end the encounter, making the officers' actions an illegal seizure because they lacked reasonable suspicion

The court explicitly factored race into its Fourth Amendment analysis, pointing out that an "objective and reasonable Black man" would feel coerced during a police encounter due to the historical context of policing. The U.S. Supreme Court subsequently declined to review this race-based standard, leaving the D.C. Court of Appeals' precedent in place despite dissents from Justices Alito and Thomas.
So the SCotUS has decided that judges need to take into account a persons racial status for determining whether a constitutional impact has occurred. This opens the path for (B)lack people to have a special precedent when interacting with Law Enforcement. IE: Two-Tier policing. One set of rules for niggers and one set for everyone (white) else.

Alito and the HNIC both dissented but the other judges declined to take the case and the nigger gets to walk free.

https://law.justia.com/cases/district-of-columbia/court-of-appeals/2025/23-cf-0388.html
TLDR: Some judge in DC said that the Po-Po can't expect niggers to act like a normal human beings and thus you have to give them special exceptions during interactions. This nigger was walking around with a stolen gun shoved down his pants and when cops saw the gun shaped bulge they asked to search him, he said OK and they found the gun. The judge said "a Black Man wouldn't have the confidence to say no to Law Enforcement due to historcial and cultural racism but a white person would and thus the search is illegal" she then threw out the case as without the search there is no evidence. The DA appealed it beceause...fuck that noise, but the SCOTUS declined to take up the case so this nigger walks to get arrested next week for some other shit.

So yah...Two Tier policing for niggers. They are now offically less human then white people. Thanks Judge Lynn Leibovitz for making it offical.

(Of course it's a Jewish white woman, did you really expect anything else?)
 
The D.C. Court of Appeals threw out the firearm conviction of a Black man named Donte Carter, ruling that police unlawfully seized him. The court determined that a reasonable Black man in D.C. would not have felt free to end the encounter, making the officers' actions an illegal seizure because they lacked reasonable suspicion
I’m a little confused here, he got convicted for giving up the gun peacefully?
 
I’m a little confused here, he got convicted for giving up the gun peacefully?

It was a stolen firearm and he was a felon. So he was taken into custody and charged for illegal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon by the cops.

Basically the judge is saying that a white person would have said no to being searched but a nigger is too dumb and agreed. Without the "illegal" search there is no crime so the judge tossed the case out.
 
It was a stolen firearm and he was as felon. So he was taken into custody and charged for illegal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon by the cops.

Basically the judge is saying that a white person would have said no to being searched but a nigger is too dumb and agreed. Without the "illegal" search there is no crime so the judge tossed the case out.
Ok that makes sense. But, he gave up the gun peacefully? He didn’t go on a shooting spree when the cops approached him? That seems unusual so it makes sense why the judges were confused.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo