US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Not to the scale as general infinitary rushes. You have Napoleon and so forth that used them, but
Your "general infantry rush" is pretty useless if you don't have artillery to break up enemy defensive formations and cover the advance while the enemy is blasting you with canister at 600+ yards, before you're even in musket range.

give me some links to more than a few battles where land based gunpowder based artillery were a primary factor pre 1900s.
Bro, I am not doing homework for a fucking forum post. If you want articles on "more than a few battles," go to Google, faggot.

Much less entire wars.

German breech-loaded steel artillery operated with a range, speed, and accuracy that French muzzle-loaded artillery couldn't touch. It was a decisive factor in the war (it's war, you can't point to one single cause for the outcome, so responding that it's not the only single cause, and there are other causes, makes you a faggot).
 

German breech-loaded steel artillery operated with a range, speed, and accuracy that French muzzle-loaded artillery couldn't touch. It was a decisive factor in the war (it's war, you can't point to one single cause for the outcome, so responding that it's not the only single cause, and there are other causes, makes you a faggot).
Alright, those are good examples. I was mostly thinking of a US Civil war aspect when for the most part it was front loading canons, which was still somewhat before that and it led into the WW1 era of total shelling. I'll go on considering that one more as a forefront instead of WW1.
 
What have the democrats done to improve their numbers? From what I've seen over the past year and a half they've done nothing but double down on what lost them the election in 24
They believe their own bullshit, basically. They are convinced that elections in California and such are not even remotely fraudulent, and they see the massive numbers they get and think that if they emulate California politics they will succeed. They can’t even fathom the fact that those politics are not even remotely feasible without the election fraud, which is slowly getting peeled back.

Maybe one day they will wonder why they keep losing and realize that California et all are actually fraudulent, and that they have destroyed their party pushing hugely unpopular politics, or at least unpopular among anyone who is a taxpayer and are necessary for the continued operations of a state.
 
Not to the scale as general infinitary rushes. You have Napoleon and so forth that used them, but give me some links to more than a few battles where land based gunpowder based artillery were a primary factor pre 1900s. Much less entire wars.
Vlad Dracula and the Ottomans duking it out had effective use of field artillery on both sides.
 
Alright, those are good examples. I was mostly thinking of a US Civil war aspect when for the most part it was front loading canons, which was still somewhat before that and it led into the WW1 era of total shelling. I'll go on considering that one more as a forefront instead of WW1.

In the muzzle-loading era, shell/canister/grape beats massed formations and short & medium distance. Shell & shot wins at long distance. An enfilading barrage can annihilate whole formations both to death and morale. Your infantry is basically paralyzed if you can't deal with the enemy artillery...which requires your own artillery. Your muskets are good to ~100 yards. My cannons are good to ~1500 yards. If you don't have anything to deal with my cannons, I control the battlefield, and I win.

Another one, the Siege of Yorktown was won by artillery. Getting French siege guns into place decided the battle. According to the accounts we had, the French command explained exactly how the battle would go if and when they got their guns into place, and it played out as expected.
 
Honestly I thought it was cute lol, it's not like they wore the verse that called homosexuality a sin. I even thought it was pro-LGBT, not anti?
It's neutral-to-anti-homosexuality. It's a gentle reminder that the Rainbow belongs to humanity as a covenant that God will not bring another world-ending flood (which he did because of homosexuality and debauchery, if people read Genesis) and the homos frequently take that to imply that it's a reclamation of the rainbow as a Christian symbol, not a fag flag.
 
They believe their own bullshit, basically. They are convinced that elections in California and such are not even remotely fraudulent, and they see the massive numbers they get and think that if they emulate California politics they will succeed. They can’t even fathom the fact that those politics are not even remotely feasible without the election fraud, which is slowly getting peeled back.

Maybe one day they will wonder why they keep losing and realize that California et all are actually fraudulent, and that they have destroyed their party pushing hugely unpopular politics, or at least unpopular among anyone who is a taxpayer and are necessary for the continued operations of a state.

Why should they change anything? The fraud machine makes primaries nothing more than selections by party leadership, preventing any rebellion within the party that could threaten the establishment.
 
I don't know what to think. Seemed like an accelerationist based on what he said to the feds. He stated that they hoped that their attack on the crowd would "inspire a revolution" and "more violence" which sounds like commie talk. Add in the American flag gun and it looks even more like:
>How do you do fellow groomchord kittens chuds
>I hate the Epstein class! ERM..I mean...niggers!
>We should commit a class revolution! Terrorism!

Idk, smells like bullshit to me. The interrogator should probably dangle him by his ankles, upside-down, until he clearly can articulate the truth. Because there's no way he spilled the beans that easy, as if getting caught was part of the plan. Also
>HES FAT
>HES BALD
>HE HAS BROWN BEADY EYES
*RETARDED GONG BASHING*
 
Why should they change anything? The fraud machine makes primaries nothing more than selections by party leadership, preventing any rebellion within the party that could threaten the establishment.
The problem is that they genuinely believe their own lies.

In the past they at least paid lip service to the centrists, while secretly doing some silly business to bump up their votes. Then they could point to them winning elections as proof that their politics are popular to justify them to the politics.

Nowadays they run the vote fraud machine full tilt, have the pollsters running their results , and are convinced that they aren’t doing that or it’s not that much. Then they look at the states where the election fraud is the worst and go “hmm, making little white boys into tranny concubines for niggers is very popular “
 
I'm not sure that illustration is historically accurate - from what I have read it's meant to go in the anus and out the mouth.
Ver archivo adjunto 9154016
Yep, up the ass, through the mouth. (while alive if possible, insert and pushed up through the entire system, somewhat worse than crucification. Should've been a real common thing for them) And left out to rot. Which islamics can't stand to leave their dead out cause of arcane burial rituals like Jews had, stole that right out from them. The weakness of islam is they have such snowflakeness on their dead and their 'holy sites'. Take out mecca already, nuke and salt it, then that's fairly much it. Shoulda nuked mecca and medina with multiple ground bursts after 9/11 and watch them really suffer.

But no, can't do that, gotta keep this bullshit islam game going it seems.

That old pic probably wasn't too far off, a lot just were impaled wherever.

The "Forest of the Impaled": As Ottoman Sultan Mehmed II advanced with his army, he encountered a terrifying field populated with 20,000 impaled corpses. This macabre tactic—designed as a psychological weapon to deter the invading Ottoman forces—was so gruesome that it reportedly shocked seasoned soldiers and forced the Sultan to turn his army back. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Vlad the mustached chad had a great time there. Only Charlemagne in Europe post Rome had it as good probably.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo