US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Oh look it’s bad will hunting, here to ask us how we’re enjoying our apples with big words in a terrible accent
Do you like apples? Too fawkin' bad, you cawksuckah!
Western Europe has the last truly marxist goverments left. China basically recreated the dynasty system with a thin veneer of communism.
Not necessarily. Leninist flavors of Marxism like Maosim argue they are "truer" forms of Marxism because they advocate for revolutionary action over all, and have been more successful in maintaining stable governments. Say whatever you want about China, Laos, and Vietnam, but they survived the Cold War.

A common criticism of European Marxism is it's fat and happy, which is pretty true. Lenin famously broke from European Marxists during WWI because they weren't violent enough and, in many cases, preferred peaceful parliamentary reforms over outright conflict. European Marxism is seen as a complete failure, but it's still popular because it lets you have your cake and eat it, too.
 
The big issue that Trump kindof just worked out/executed making the US Local Region (US & Central America) is a positive energy produce so while it might make the US grumble a bit about price it is absolutely devastation for every one else if the Middle East gets shut down. We are setup to survive on our own. Every else? Not so much.
Agreed but its going to have to come with real costs of we want to have something that isn't broken. Like we need to actually get off our asses and invest in rail and mass transit infrastructure too not just in your tier 1 cities like Dallas or Philly but smaller cities like Cincinnati or Birmingham.
 
Like we need to actually get off our asses and invest in rail and mass transit infrastructure too not just in your tier 1 cities like Dallas or Philly but smaller cities like Cincinnati or Birmingham.

As much as I would like to see this, Americans have a huge issue with imminent domain thats needed to create these project. China has the luxury of saying 'fuck you' to anyone who stand in their way, but its not happening anything soon in the US. The NIMBYs would tie it up in court for years.
 
As much as I would like to see this, Americans have a huge issue with imminent domain thats needed to create these project. China has the luxury of saying 'fuck you' to anyone who stand in their way, but its not happening anything soon in the US. The NIMBYs would tie it up in court for years.
It would be so funny if it was really imminent domain instead of eminent. Like “just wait, we’ll take it”
 
I've been a lot of places, seen a lot of breathtaking places, I mean literally so beautiful it takes your breath away. No place I rather be than where I am right now, right in the shadow of the Appalachians, when i visited California I was tested in this. I cannot imagine how angry someone born and raised there would feel about it all. I just wanted to do more than just like your post, I wanted to tell you i'm sorry they took that from you, from others, from all of us really.
"This is beautiful...and that's not fair to the ugly. Why don't we smear it with piss and shit?"

This is the basic mentality of every leftist.

1780685719682.png
 
As much as I would like to see this, Americans have a huge issue with imminent domain thats needed to create these project. China has the luxury of saying 'fuck you' to anyone who stand in their way, but its not happening anything soon in the US. The NIMBYs would tie it up in court for years.
While our local governments have the right of eminent domain, they are also way more likely to buy out land from individuals at a much higher than market value to avoid the hassle. The cost of acquiring land is nothing compared to actually building the thing on that land. It only becomes a problem if there are holdouts who won't sell.
 
Agreed but its going to have to come with real costs of we want to have something that isn't broken. Like we need to actually get off our asses and invest in rail and mass transit infrastructure too not just in your tier 1 cities like Dallas or Philly but smaller cities like Cincinnati or Birmingham.
In terms of using less gas? The US already has the worlds largest rail network but we just use it for freight instead of people. Considering the absolute size of the US that is probably all its going to be used for since at best you have local mass transit, cars to drive medium to long distances, and airplanes to travel extreme (anything more than 7+ hours depending) for people.

As for more local mass transit: That would require arresting black people. Get over that hump and local mass transit will kick off.
 
I'm convinced the ability to see d/dx is rare.
It doesn't particularly help that the pedagogy around math in the US sucks. Kids are made to hate math when they shouldn't, and calculus is sold as some sort of Ultimate Final Boss of Math that breaks the minds of even the biggest math-loving nerds. That any branch of math beyond basic arithmetic could be useful for any situation one might encounter in life is never taught, and even arithmetic is ultimately disparaged as useless busywork because calculators exist. Instead, all one ever gets is spherical imaginary numbers in a vacuum.
 
Última edición:
China isn’t terribly different from the Soviet Union aside from us willingly doing business with them.
I didn't see this until after I did my above post, but it's very different. The Soviets were foundationally and nominally Leninist, but pursued an express policy of peaceful coexistence with the West because both sides had nukes. While the Soviets were pretty fucking wild, they wanted to avoid nuclear war because they understood very well that it could end the entire world. Their leaders actually understood the power of nukes, the dire consequences (even if anyone survived), and how dangerous these weapons are.

This led to severe disagreements: Castro told Krushchev, explicitly, to nuke the US during the Cuban Missile Crisis even if that meant Cuba would be annihilated. Mao also condemned Krushchev and basically called him and the Soviets pussies for not starting a nuclear holocaust. Soviet communism was not great by any means, but it was the most realistic because it was, at the time, the most powerful and a serious rival to the US. Now that the US has no peer and the Soviets called it quits, all that's left are the extremist Leninists and the leftover, reform-oriented champagne socialists in Europe.

China is willing to do business with us, economically, but the Soviets were far more diplomatic. We should be very concerned about China building up its nuclear arsenal, which it has done rapidly over the past 5 years. They do have an explicitly no first strike policy, which is good, but there are radicals in their government who want to destroy the US in a literal sense. The best outcome is the US continues to outpace China economically, militarily, and diplomatically, and China keeps its nukes as a "hey, don't fuck with us" policy instead of doing what Iran wants to do.

Or instead of Israel's dangerous-ass nuclear doctrine.
 
Última edición:
Give her a sliver of credit. Few people would be willing to admit that they were wrong, much less admit that they hate admitting they were wrong.
True. A rare case. If we didn't have so many of these reactionary loons, both left and right, that hate objectively good things just because their team didn't do it we'd be a much better off country.
 
This led to severe disagreements: Castro told Krushchev, explicitly, to nuke the US during the Cuban Missile Crisis even if that meant Cuba would be annihilated.
Oh man, we can’t take Khrushchev as an example for the Soviet Union, he was a simple minded drunk who I believe genuinely wanted to be friends with Eisenhower. He built a whole ass golf course just for Eisenhower, but then when he came to America, we told him he couldn’t go to Disney Land, and Eisenhower canceled on him.

Poor guy.

But to the broader point, yeah the Russians had a prior status quo, like being european, that they were occasionally tempted not to stray too far from whereas Chinese have always been cockroaches
 
I get especially tickled when feminists champion Althusser since the dude murdered his fucking wife and got away with it.
The funny thing is that Althusser is considered discredited by continental Marxists, the only places that take him seriously are US English departments. And they do NOT like it when you bring up his "unfortunate" personal history that they neglected to mention when pushing the idea of "ideological state apparatuses."
 
I didn't see this until after I did my above post, but it's very different. The Soviets were foundationally and nominally Leninist, but pursued an express policy of peaceful coexistence with the West because both sides had nukes. While the Soviets were pretty fucking wild, they wanted to avoid nuclear war because they understood very well that it could end the entire world. Their leaders actually understood the power of nukes, the dire consequences (even if anyone survived), and how dangerous these weapons are.

This led to severe disagreements: Castro told Krushchev, explicitly, to nuke the US during the Cuban Missile Crisis even if that meant Cuba would be annihilated. Mao also condemned Krushchev and basically called him and the Soviets pussies for not starting a nuclear holocaust. Soviet communism was not great by any means, but it was the most realistic because it was, at the time, the most powerful and a serious rival to the US. Now that the US has no peer and the Soviets called it quits, all that's left are the extremist Leninists and the leftover, reform-orienter champagne socialists in Europe.

China is willing to do business with us, economically, but the Soviets were far more diplomatic. We should be very concerned about China building up its nuclear arsenal, which it has done rapidly over the past 5 years. They do have an explicitly no first strike policy, which is good, but there are radicals in their government who want to destroy the US in a literal sense. The best outcome is the US continues to outpace China economically, militarily, and diplomatically, and China keeps its nukes as a "hey, don't fuck with us" policy instead of doing what Iran wants to do.

Or instead of Israel's dangerous-ass nuclear doctrine.
The way things are going, China is more likely to use those nukes on itself. Chinese civil wars are probably the most brutal fighting you can get.
 
The funny thing is that Althusser is considered discredited by continental Marxists, the only places that take him seriously are US English departments. And they do NOT like it when you bring up his "unfortunate" personal history that they neglected to mention when pushing the idea of "ideological state apparatuses."
History departments as well, unfortunately. Althusser also admitted, while under house arrest, he never read Das Kapital or other major works by Marx. He was more into Hegel, but that's another story.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo