True from 2021-2024. Democrat voters wanted immigration to take off like a rocket, and it did. Foreign-born employment slammed into a wall when Trump took office. Party's over for the jeet.
Unlikely, considering that the truck driver involved in the crash sued Biden for defamation because Joe kept claiming that he was driving drunk when he provably wasn't. Most likely scenario is that there was ice on the roads because it was December in Delaware. Alternately, she decided to go family annihilator because she knew what kind of monster Joe is and the idea that he would now be a Senator was too terrifying for her to countenance.
Thanks for the info.
This would probably be a reason for some of it as well.
The population is required to always increase because the cost projections of all the entitlement programs the boomers promised themselves that the rest of us will pay for are based on a much larger population of taxpayers. The last week of a senior's life costs taxpayers more than they have contributed into the system their entire lives (not counting all of the benefits they've already gotten before that final week). In 1945 there were 42 workers paying into the system for every one Social Security beneficiary. Today its 3 workers per beneficiary. This is unsustainable.
I moved to a town with like three people in it and got a job because I’m white and can speak in something recognizable as English sentences.
Why did you feel the need to put created in quotations? The very idea that jobs need creating so that people can participate in the economy is itself inorganic and pursuant to a modernist paradigm, as opposed to people naturally just finding work to do among themselves and paying each other in goods and services.
As much as some may hate boomers, there will be a lot of elder abuse in the years to come. Incompetent, brown "nurses" with sketchy qualifications will probably let them languish away in 4th rate retirement homes.
But partially cutting the brake lines was a major meme back in the day
That's related to the employment-to-population ratio. One of the quirks of our system is that you're only counted as being "in the workforce" if you're employed or actively looking for employment. If you're not looking for work, you're not considered to be technically "in" the workforce. For example, the numbers of Boomer women and ex-housewives that flooded the job market in the 70s and 80s dramatically increased the workforce numbers. After the dotcom bubble popped, you'll notice that the employment-to-population ratio had a permanent falloff from its peak at that time. Some of that is due to a combination of Boomers retiring over the last 25 years, some of it's related to the weird NEET sub-economy we've had the last 5-10 years.
Oh come on, he’s not too gay to be president
Just giving up and living off your parents wasn't an option until recently. Everyone worked because they had to. I worked at a lumber yard because I had to. I had a bachelor's degree. So did two other guys at the yard. The idea that this was monstrously unfair, and that I could just not work instead, never crossed my mind.
The VP is calling for RWDS and you're blackpilling?
Not to undersell the degree to which boomers cause the problem overall, but this in particular is largely due to their kids not being willing to pull the plug. Which I do empathize with, but does cause problems.
I would rather pick cotton than go back to working in the food industry even if the pay was the same and i'm not kidding.
The jobs reports have all sorts of weird nuance that makes them misleading. I've been a freelancer for 8 years paid entirely on 1099 and I usually average around 100k, so while i don't add to the unemployment numbers I also don't add to the "well paid job hiring" numbers. If a company fires their employee and hires me as a freelancer it just looks like a job disappeared at least that's my understanding of it.
You are spiritually brown if you make this grammar mistake.
He is brown though, give him some slack please.
Modern journalism in a nutshell, The first one is an article which references a paywalled op-ed, which in turn references a book that they refuse to actually give a link to, all the while refusing to actually put a link to the BLS stats
I will never forgive them for that. I love California, I still miss the chaparral and the sea.
