💰 Grifter Milo Yiannopoulos / Milo Wagner / Milo Hanrahan / @nero - Gets banned from everywhere, Stole charity money and general supervillan antics, Probably a Fed

[Wesley Willis]

He was defending the "anti-semitic" trolls on Dave Rubin's show a few months back. I guess Simon & Jewster took him to Bohemian Grove for a little meeting.

 

[The Valeyard]

He was defending the "anti-semitic" trolls on Dave Rubin's show a few months back. I guess Simon & Jewster took him to Bohemian Grove for a little meeting.

Simon & Schuster dropped him back in February, so the book is self-published.

 

[Wesley Willis]

Simon & Schuster dropped him back in February, so the book is self-published.

I doubt that affected the book's contents. It's just throwaway material for an easy buck.

 

[Feline Darkmage]

idk why we have this thread when we should be sending Based Pederast all the mulatto boipussy we can find. He may condone sex with preteens but who cares as long as he's *owning libs* and being one of the alt-right's many sassy gay best friends.

another celebrity homo playing fast and loose with age of consent laws, what a shocker

Speak for yourself Osama, you're a dead gay skeleton.

 

[OwO What's This?]

 

[Kiwi Farms dot net]

Omg is that Josh Tejada?? It totally is. Cow crossover?

Psychojosh is the guy that wears "I like my women visible from orbit" shits to evo and shills his giantess porn/fighting idea nonstop.

 

[Pikimon]

Milo looks puffy

 

[lol you sukc]

I guess he doesn't do college speeches anymore? All things considered, that's a real shame. The triggerings going on were always epic.

 

[Vorhtbame]

Milo looks puffy

It's probably just that time of the month.

 

[BurnerRobot]

Milo discussing traps... shouldn't shotacon be more up his alley?

 

[Y2K Baby]

I bet Milo doesn't even have a good ass.

 

[Pikimon]

I bet Milo doesn't even have a good ass.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Of course you would know.

 

[He Sets Me On Fire]

Gamergate the chapter. Goes through the history of gamergate from the start to where it is now. Discusses crazy femenists that take over cultural with their insane ideals summed up in this quote where a feminist professor goes to say that Buffalo Bill in “Silence of the Lambs” is a hero.

“In her influential essay, “When Nothing Is Cool,” she describes how one scholar used critical studies to turn Buffalo Bill, the sadistic antagonist of Silence of the Lambs, into a gender-defying feminist hero. By removing and wearing women’s skin, Bill apparently refutes the idea that maleness and femaleness are carr

Wait, wait, hold on -

(Scrolls up, checks title. "Gamers Don't Hate Me." "Gamers." Video games. The people who play video games. Heroic Buffalo Bill skinning dead women.)

... the hell?

 

[CervixHammer]

the LA Times posted an article about the ACLU and Milo, and holy hell is their website a perfect example of why I use adblock (it refuses to show you the article if you have it on, and autoplays like six videos with full-volume audio at once when you turn it off, so I'm posting the text here).

ACLU sues Washington, D.C., transit system for removing Milo Yiannopoulos ads

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a free speech lawsuit on behalf of one of the nation’s most prominent right-wing provocateurs on Wednesday, arguing that Washington, D.C., transit officials violated Milo Yiannopoulos’ 1st Amendment rights by removing advertisements for his new book.

Yiannopoulos, who is British, is not the group’s only client in its lawsuit filed in federal court against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. The ACLU’s lawsuit also objected to the agency’s decision to block ad placements for the animal rights group People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the abortion provider Carafem and the ACLU itself.

But it’s the left-leaning group’s defense of Yiannopoulos — a former editor of Breitbart News who has criticized the ACLU in the past — that is likely to raise the most eyebrows.

The ACLU has long filed free speech cases on behalf of far-right groups and individuals who are traditionally adversaries of the ACLU’s own base of supporters, who have counted on the civil liberties organization to act as a bulwark against the Trump administration in the courts.

But the case marks one of the first times that the ACLU has stepped in to represent a member of Yiannopoulos’ milieu — the new generation of younger right-wing agitators who have gained national prominence over the last two years through online trolling and public spectacles, claiming the mantle of free speech advocacy while left-wing opponents accuse them of using hate speech against people of color, immigrants and Muslims.

“This case is a beautiful illustration of the indivisibility of the 1st Amendment,” said Lee Rowland, a staff attorney for the ACLU’s national branch and one of the attorneys behind the lawsuit. “When we give government the power to regulate speakers based on their identity or their perceived level of offense, it reduces speech for all of us.”

Rowland added: “It is important to defend speech we hate, because that means the 1st Amendment tide rises for all of us.”

In statement sent to the Los Angeles Times via text message, Yiannopoulos said he was “glad that the ACLU has decided to tackle a real civil rights issue” after backing “plenty of bad causes in the past,” though he added that “they are also often in the right.”

“Free speech isn’t about only support speech you agree with, it is about supporting all speech — especially the words of your enemies,” Yiannopoulos wrote. “Strong opponents keep us honest.”

The ACLU’s lawsuit stems from ad rules instituted by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority in 2015 that include bans on some medical advertisements and advertisements “intended to influence members of the public regarding an issue on which there are varying opinions.”

“One of our core allegations is that WMATA’s rules are so vague that they could basically decide that any advertisement does or does not pass muster on a totally ad hoc basis,” said Rowland.

Requests to place paid ads for PETA, Carafem and ACLU “were flat-out rejected by these very mushy rules,” Rowland said.

In June, WMATA’s outside advertising agency initially agreed to place ads for Yiannopoulos’ new book, “Dangerous,” after reaching a $27,690 deal with Yiannopoulos’ company, MILO Worldwide LLC, the lawsuit said.

But about 10 days into a four-week run, the agency reversed course and took down dozens of advertisements featuring Yiannopoulos’ face and the book title after riders complained, offering to pay back Yiannopoulos’ company, according to the lawsuit. Yiannopoulos refused, stating: “We consider this to be a violation of our 1st Amendment rights.”

The lawsuit seeks to have the ads reinstated for placement on Washington’s transit system and for the agency’s ad rules to be declared unconstitutional.

The agency plans to fight the lawsuit. “WMATA intends to vigorously defend its commercial advertising guidelines, which are reasonable and view-point neutral,” the agency said in a statement.

This is not Yiannopoulos’ only lawsuit involving his book. Yiannopoulos has also sued Simon & Schuster for canceling its book contract with Yiannopoulos in February as Yiannopoulos faced public criticism over his past comments appearing to endorse pedophilia. Not typically one to apologize for something he’s said, the firestorm resulted in Yiannopoulos resigning from Breitbart News and backing away from his remarks.

Yiannopoulos has since attempted to stage a comeback by self-publishing his book and launching an entertainment company based in Florida. Yiannopoulos’ book has spent four weeks on the New York Times’ combined print & e-book nonfiction bestseller list, though the book has been panned by mainstream critics.

and the LA Times' writer posted a few things from his research:

Spoiler: how much does he do it for?

>Speaking Fee: $0
>epic_4chan_janitor_hotpockets_meme.jpg

lol he was the one who asked us to interview him

 

[Feline Darkmage]

“In her influential essay, “When Nothing Is Cool,” she describes how one scholar used critical studies to turn Buffalo Bill, the sadistic antagonist of Silence of the Lambs, into a gender-defying feminist hero. By removing and wearing women’s skin, Bill apparently refutes the idea that maleness and femaleness are carried within us. “Gender,” Judith Halberstam explains, is “always posthuman, always a sewing job which stitches identity into a body bag.” The corpse, once flayed, “has been degendered, it is postgender.”

That's certainly a new take on the story I hadn't seen before. Normally the loony tune SJW types decry Bill as a character "transphobic" despite the fact the dialogue in the book makes it clear he isn't gender non-conforming or trans, just a delusional, bloodthirsty psychopath with a fetish.

 

[NimertiS]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=T90XSICHrGo
Ver archivo adjunto 254600

I like this moar

 

[Chemical snorfare]

just a delusional, bloodthirsty psychopath with a fetish.

so, erm, Trans then.

 

[Pikimon]

the LA Times posted an article about the ACLU and Milo, and holy hell is their website a perfect example of why I use adblock (it refuses to show you the article if you have it on, and autoplays like six videos with full-volume audio at once when you turn it off, so I'm posting the text here).



and the LA Times' writer posted a few things from his research:

Spoiler: how much does he do it for?

Ver archivo adjunto 260828
>Speaking Fee: $0
>epic_4chan_janitor_hotpockets_meme.jpg

Ver archivo adjunto 260829

Ver archivo adjunto 260830

Milo has lied about "turning down" interviews before so I don't see why he isn't lying about this one too.

He claimed that he turned down Samantha Bee for an interview (bc hes so famous lol) and then one of the writers of the show posted that Samantha Bee denied him an interview.

 

[CatParty]

LOL