😵‍💫 Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

Sorry for my absence. The sudden heatwave fried my remaining braincells and I forgot Acerthorn existed, so I forgot to update the gym updates (Thanks to @WarJams for coming in clutch). But I got one from yesterday/two days ago.

Ver archivo adjunto 9070651

It's very interesting that he's stopped giving the commentary with his updates. I reckon it is because he's seeing the criticism on this end and deciding that giving us too much info is giving the gym autist too much ammunition. Thing is, I would say providing more information even if it gets you ridicule is better if you want the input, but clearly he's ignoring the advice being put on here or pretending Google AI is the source...

Which fuck off Stabby, why would you accept AI advice on workouts? What if Google is getting you back for trying to sue them and is using the AI to give you a heart attack or stroke during a workout?

If it turns out this is true I want a fucking medal for calling it.
Just ignore any advice Stebbins. You are definitely smarter than everyone who has ever made gains in the gym
 
I thought about making a wisecrack yesterday about how the judge should take him at his word that he didn't realize what he was even filing, so he filed the wrong motion before the wrong judge because he's just a poor wittle FAT pro se retard, so it would only be right to strike the motions that were stated to be wrong before addressing this new objection... And then I kept reading and he said he was late, and I thought "shoot, there's the easiest off ramp in the world."

But then Old Bag went and did both. The absolute madwoman!

Oh, I'm laughing.
Oh this is really going to endear Stabby to the judge. Judges *love* when people directly accuse them of lying in a filing.
Obviously, the court isn't lying, They never said he withdrew it. She said she deemed it withdrawn. She has condemned it to the bitchheap, and they don't want to hear it. They obviously don't give a fuck about his stupid hollow appeal threats.

Also, about that meet and confer?
 
he's speed running another vex lit label in this case.
Only because everybody is part of the conspiracy against him. The courts hate him for literally no reason, he should file a Writ of Super Mandamus with the SUPREME court to force all lesser courts to be nice to him.
 
I love the way he stamps his feet and demands a "detailed explanation" every time he doesn't get what he wants.
The answer is simple and the response should be nothing more elaborate than:.

"You are representing yourself pro se, and as such, you will be held to the same standards or professionalism as your opponents lawyer.
It was made abundantly clear to you, prior to this case being read, that I am not able to provide legal advice to either party in this matter.
If you require legal advice then you should retain a competent lawyer."
 
This is my favorite thread. Every new post of stabbys latest stupidity, failure, or seething gobbling fills my heart with child like joy. Shout out to all the courts conspiring against him, they must be having a laugh at him too.
 
I asked. Gemini says absolutely not.
Sad day. Maybe Stabby takes this as the challenge it is.

Ver archivo adjunto 9070715
That's actually false, some conservative influencers or something like that sued google because all their models (including their open weight ones) kept "hallucinating" that they were criminals (but too consistently, so likely not actual hallucinations but more likely someone poisoned their training data, probably a bored intern with a liberal streak).
Or look at Grok's repeated run-ins with Will Stancil.
 
I found a lot more information about Stebbins time at college.
We all know he threatened to commit a school shooting at the University of Arkansas but he took an online class from the University of Phoenix and attrnded Northern Arkansas College in 2010, 2011, and 2016.

I found Stebbins' 2011 college transcript on page 93 of this document.
gov.uscourts.arwd.52298.79.0_p92_transcript.jpg
LMAO, a transfer credit from the University of Phoenix
Nine class withdrawals!

Whining about his English class and calling his teacher "crummy".
gov.uscourts.ared.104487.25.0_p9-10.jpg
Acerthorn says his college English teacher was crummy but also admits he got D's and C's in English throughout high school. The only constant factor in his repeated poor performance is himself.

He says his professor didn't even try to help him but he include an email showing he's a lying liar.
email.jpg
"All you body paragraphs need to follow the MEAL (Main Idea, Evidence, Analysis, Lead) plan and right now they do not."
"your paper has many claims that are not supported or not supported well with evidence from scholarly sources."

Stebbins emails college admin at 8:30 AM to complain about his teacher because she didn't immediately email him back.
gov.uscourts.ared.104487.25.0_p13.jpg
I'm currently taking English Comp II I'm supposed to do an explication on a poem and turn it in
on Monday.
But here's the real complaint I sent Mrs. Lanning an email saying that I can't login. but she
hasn't responded.
And I get it; it's early in the morning As of the time of this writing, it's been less than half an hour
since the business day started.

I actually found a copy of Acerthorn's poem analysis he posted on a tech support forum.
Let us A-log Stebbins' homework.
An Explication of Florence Anthony's ''Conversation'', part 2.jpg
You can read the poem he's analyzing here.
Paragraph 1
"and the lack of desire to talk about death"
The word you're looking for is "reluctance."

"Of special note is the speaker's withdrawal of his query and the dying person's describe of what death is like."
Should be "description of what death is like"

Paragraph 2
"while his loved one vomits some sort of acid on the floor."
Please at least try to demonstrate to your professor you understand similies, metaphors and aren't reading everything completely literally.

"This is because death is a horrible thought that no one wants to confront. To emphasize the horribleness of death, the dying person likens it to that of wearing"
He follows "horrible" with "horribleness." His vocabulary seems very limited
These two sentences are so repetitive they should be joined. They could be rewritten as
"She emphasizes the horribleness of death by likening it to wearing..."

Paragraph 3
"The poem is not very subtle at all about the symbolism and imagery, since it literally spells out for us that."
Being non-subtle intentionally is better described as "being direct."
This was the only class he took that semester and we know he wasn't busy with a job or a social life. I guess this really is the best he can do.
The gall of this guy to call his professor crummy and blame her for her performance when the quality of his work is terrible.
He's never to blame. Reading all of Acerthorn's BS across his many lawsuits you'd think his entire miserable life is someone else's fault.
 

Archivos adjuntos

Última edición:
I find the fact that David got an A in Human Realations (whatever class that is) down right hilarious.

God really does have a sense of humor.
The obvious answer is the class was probably a cake course that hands out automatic A's, which of course speaks very highly for the class, program, and school.

However, there's a couple alternative theories for sure:

- Maybe the teacher thought he was intentionally being contrarian for the course, and thought he was doing such an exceptional job they had to give him an A.

- Maybe David was brought in as a model of sorts for the other students to learn about the vast intricacies of human relations? Ya know? Researching the dynamics for how to navigate such an adversarial individual, and how you could apply that in the real world.

TBH, there's legitimate scientific and academic value in that kind of research. Acerthorn is so statically set on the antagonistic spectrum that he's basically the perfect control. The only real issue are the numerous variables in how he chooses to respond, but even that is kinda narrowed down to a specific subset.
 
I find the fact that David got an A in Human Realations (whatever class that is) down right hilarious.
On the second attempt!

He had to withdraw from Human Relations the previous semester, which makes for a fitting summary of David's life hence: "withdrawn from Human Relations."

As for what the hell it is:
MM 1303 - Human Relations
Credits: 3
This course provides a basic understanding of the relationships between people and provides business and social skills necessary for personal attributes, ethical conduct, supervision, and leadership. Lecture 3 hours per week.
 
This course provides a basic understanding of the relationships between people and provides business and social skills necessary for personal attributes, ethical conduct, supervision, and leadership. Lecture 3 hours per week.
How did he get an A when he clearly has neither ethical conduct nor social skills in speaking to people. He's probably never gotten anyone to do anything for him out of respect, understanding, or any form of agreement. 9/10 of his requests are probably fulfilled as a matter of "oh God please make this fat retarded turkey go away."
 
This course provides a basic understanding of the relationships between people and provides business and social skills necessary for personal attributes, ethical conduct, supervision, and leadership. Lecture 3 hours per week.
So it's basically "How to survive ass burgers 101," failing to account for the fact that ass burgers utilitarian approach to basically everything means that all the information from the class will only matter for as long as it takes them to pass the class and then will be immediately discarded.
 
It's for profit diploma mill with a bad reputation due to constant advertising on daytime television. 98% of college staff is part-time with no tenure. Abysmal 17% graduation rate.
If it's a diploma mill shouldn't they have a better graduation rate?

But eh, sorry, I should have specified that I was asking what a "class withdrawal" was.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo