US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
If a skirmish a world way is causing economic hardships at home then America is in no shape to give up the empire. Until our domestic production at a point we don't need to rely on other countries to meet our needs it is in America's best interests to maintain a global presence or else we risk a rival filling that void and screwing us over.
 
If a skirmish a world way is causing economic hardships at home then America is in no shape to give up the empire. Until our domestic production at a point we don't need to rely on other countries to meet our needs it is in America's best interests to maintain a global presence or else we risk a rival filling that void and screwing us over.
Has giving up an 'empire' ever worked out for the ones in power? UK, Russia, Rome, Ottomans? They all end up fucked quickly. So yeah, these idiots going on about it as if we even have one.. Whatever.
 
I found it pretty fucking weird that the 250th Independence Day is roughly only a month away and yet literally all of corporate America seems determined to ignore it. I’ve seen people posting videos of the 1976 stuff, but even the 225th was more hyped.
I hit up the grocery store earlier today, the Coke guy was swapping in a new front door display. “Oh ok, they’re finally putting up some Fourth stuff”. Finish shopping. It’s a goddamn Latinx twink cheering on soccer faggotry in both English and Spanish with a QR code to win tickets.

Absolutely everything is downstream of replacement migration. Everything.
 
Has giving up an 'empire' ever worked out for the ones in power? UK, Russia, Rome, Ottomans? They all end up fucked quickly. So yeah, these idiots going on about it as if we even have one.. Whatever.
"I am an imperialist because I will not be a colonial."

Giving up the empire is downstream of domestic decline in those cases, not the other way around. Britain was reduced to an American vassal state after WW2, and had her empire stripped on the orders of Washington alongside the traitors on Downing Street. The Soviet Union was already a mess in the 1980s, and ran into the problem of being a Revolutionary State after everyone realized the revolution failed and needed to be replaced. No legitimacy and no loyalty.
The Turks lost their empire through force, probably the most understandable and least embarrassing of the bunch.
And the Romans lost half the empire through inviting foreigners to maintain the political power of the entrenched elites against native rivals. No parallels can be drawn from then to modern days.
 
Última edición:
Daily reminder that Charlie Kirk was murdered by a tranny-loving furry who had ties to the Socialist Rifle Club and that thousands literally danced on Charlie's grave.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=YEvfnYPXsJg
30.06 can blown the whole shoulder off an elk

reminder they broght in concrete resurfacers few days after charlies popping, totatly normal behavior
1779594489021.png 1779594527767.png

ALLEGEDLY his mic had pager like explosives in it and the maroons installed it wrong so it sent a shitload of shrapnel DOWN into the concrete
1779594777256.png
 
This may be controversial but I think anybody whose policy is to “just nuke em all” is naive
Yeah nuclear weapons may leave survivors at the edge of the blast radius you have to be prepared to send in infantry to set up death camps afterwards, and the firestorm and radiation would make that significantly more logistically problematic than it needs to be. Plus nukes are inefficient if you want to keep the infrastructure, other ordinance or a biological weapon is probably more effective. Poisoning foodstuff or water supplies, for example, would be a more economical use of resources.

Put. The. Bottle. Down.
Don't listen to them @StudMccool break out the Glenlivet 40 and Everclear I want to see you solve the Riemann Hypothesis you got this I believe in you
 
yeah a country WE starved, socialism had nothing to do with it.
"Socialism can't survive without evil free market Capitalist trade, everyone knows that!!"

It's the least expensive war in US history, and arguably the most one-sided in our favor. Even Grenada was worse.

Anti-war sperging should really be reserved for shit like 20-year wars in Iraq or Afghanistan with a quarter million boots on the ground, not some minor skirmish where we test out China's overhyped radar/missile tech by flattening some idiots with cruise missiles.

Otherwise it becomes like the constant anti-jew sperging of the Groypers; annoying as all fuck.

Nothing has made me care less about Epstein than the people that will not shut up about Epstein. Anyone that unironically uses the phrase "the Epstein class" is so phenomenally brain dead I'm surprised they haven't forgotten how to breathe.
It would help is half the people whining about the "Epstein class" weren't openly taking money from billionaire NYC Jews or pedophile Arabs and Turks.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo