That you'd equate the civil rights era with "1000+ years of western/Christian philosophy" is all that really needs to be pointed out here to demonstrate why I'm not reading the rest of your drivel. If you're going to be a raging demagogue who isn't going to listen, I'm not going to respect you either.
What was the civil rights movement in your mind? You're intentionally playing semantics games where "X does not equal X but actually equals Y". So what was the civil rights movement? Was it a Jewish conspiracy? How did the conspiracy come about? I can point you towards examples of evangelicals leading the charge in the abolitionist movement in the mid-1800s. Those evangelicals would have had an understanding of both the Bible and western humanist philosophies that came from Europe. Obviously history isn't a direct thruline, but people pick up pieces they like different ideas and spread them in their own way. I don't see why this is a difficult concept to understand but I'm open to hearing about how the Elders of Zion approved the civil rights movement with a nice big Star of David rubberstamp.
I'm not reading the rest of your drivel
Waaahh someone was mean to me on a fruit forum mommy!!!
If you're going to be a raging demagogue who isn't going to listen, I'm not going to respect you either.
I'm open to new ideas and new ways of thinking. I have certain foundational principals I believe in but otherwise I'm open to looking at things from a variety of angles. Your angle however, I don't find persuasive so far. I'm sorry that calling you a nigger has stunlocked you into being unable to read. You should get that checked out by a doctor! (Oh but right all doctors are Jews and they'll pull nanomachines in your brain to believe that covid didn't come from a lab or something. Dammit!)
You have no idea why you believe what you do regarding race; it's not a coincidence that shit started in earnest post WW2.
What "shit". I just mentioned the abolitionist movements (a lot of which were led by white evangelicals) in the mid-1800s. Do you think these were niche groups of fringe lunatics before the late 1940s? Why did it start "in earnest" post-WW2?
And my opinions on race are pretty simple. I think in general different races have evolved based on environment, but on an individual level I try not to treat anyone differently than I am. If someone is exiting a store, I hold the door open for them doesn't matter if they're a man, woman, asian, black whatever. I'm still human and I still get pissed off at people of course, but in general that's how I feel.
The rest of your whining will be relegated to the dustbin as my point is proven in real-time to your chagrin
Oh man I can't wait. If I cashed this take in at Vegas I wonder which I would get more money on? This or endtimes preachers saying the world is going to end in 5 years? That's also a convenient way of saying "I
consneed your point because I have no way to refute it because I'm speaking entirely from emotion".
f you're going to insist that racial colorblindness that has only existed in the liberal post-WW2 order is an inherent aspect of Christianity despite the historical evidence otherwise, as things regress to the mean you're eventually going to find yourself in a crisis of faith. A serious one.
I think racial colorblindness is retarded. It's okay to acknowledge differences between races. I think liberal intelligentsia making a big overcorrection in saying that it does make you racist to acknowledge differences is assbackwards if it makes them uncomfortable. Why would that give me a crisis of faith? My faith is in Christ who said that his kingdom is not of this world. So why would worldly things that don't give me a crisis of faith suddenly give me one?
Moreover, if you and others are going to continue to deny this specifically where whites are concerned, you can only expect further dismissal of your unrealistic and ahistorical perspective on Christianity and Western values to result in further alienation of the church from the masses.
I never made a denial of racial differences. Again, my apologies for calling you a nigger and that stunlocking you into being unable to read. But if you quit acting like a nigger maybe this wouldn't be such a problem. I think your idea of racial tribalism and bringing everyone down to a nigger mindset is retarded and unrealistic. First of all, who gets considered as "white"? Is it all ethnic Europeans? Do Italians get included? What about the Irish? Going back to my point being "ahistorical" if you actually knew history, you would know the Irish, and Catholic Europeans were seen as white niggers when immigrating to America.
And as far as alienating masses from The Church (I'll assume you mean Christendom as a whole and not any specific denomination), I personally don't feel like it's my place to evangelize. I think the truth of Jesus's ministry is self-evident and is ready for anyone to accept it whenever they feel like they're ready to answer the call. I know that's not how everyone else feels who are regulars ITT, but that's what's fun about it, it's fun going over theological differences and gaining insight from different perspectives.
I read your post, like I said multiple times in fact. But you conveniently swept my points into the "dustbin" that directly make you look retarded. Which is pretty bishmade and pussy-like for a warrior of da huwyte race.
I'm not the cartoon caricature you wrote your hilariously overwrought faggot response to, in other words.
I'm glad you thought it was funny! I had fun writing it.
But I never said you were a cartoon caricature and wasn't trying to dehumanize you. You are a human being like I am, and you have my respect insofar as that goes. That doesn't mean I'm not going to call your points and your takes retarded if I think they're retarded. Can you not handle that? Are your opinions so tied to your identity that me thinking your opinions are retarded is an insult to your humanity? That's pretty rough buddy.
I explained, to someone who said they didn't understand, why what they said they didn't understand, was happening. Along with an extra helping of explaining that this nu-Christian concept of tabula rasa is ahistorical, and the evidence that we're regressing to the mean is present when you see Whites increasingly becoming racially aware and racially politically active.
I actually didn't know what "tabula rasa" meant, but after doing quick googling, I think that's retarded and that's not my opinion. Obviously we're not "blank slates". We are products of our environment, who raised us, what time and place we're living in. Ignoring that is being insanely obtuse and I don't think anyone is making that point but I guess it's easier for you to shadowbox a strawman than to actually engage with what people are saying. Sad!
Your response was apparently, to write a homosexual wall of text defending the crowning achievement of kikes that hate you (and I am not assuming you're White when I say that, only Christian), in American culture.
Nope, the point of my post was answering the bell to your challenge to reread your post multiple times. I did that, and refuted it line-by-line like you asked. Apparently that means I'm writing "walls of text" that you can ignore and throw into the dustbin because you're unwilling to engage in good faith.
I personally don't understand that.
Reading do be hard like dat sometiems mang when you been stunlocked by being called a nigger.
x 6 
