Stealthzdragons
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 24 de Dic, 2017
I was honestly thinking something similar to these lines. He usually isn't so boisterous about his plans. So 1 of 3 things are going to happen:"attacks that seem to isolate Tehran from the rest of the country"
Ver archivo adjunto 8820826
What if Bridge Day isn't bridge day, but air cover for some kind of planned ground action (around the Homo Straight or inland insurgents)? Trump has told us for decades that he firmly believes in strategic deception and now the Japanese Prime Minister knows too. But Bridge Day is the longest and straightest telegraphed punch in history. Very unlike Trump to let the enemy understand in advance Trump's plans to hit him.
The US Federal Government would have Iran believe two things rn: a) expect infrastructure bombings tonight if you don't come to terms and b) they've actively cooled talk of an imminent uprising with Trump openly bitching about the Kurds in recent days
What if the first is a distraction and the second was kayfabe? The West believes (a) and (b) so Iran believes it. But scheduled bombing strikes are also a good way to get your enemy leaders predictably concentrated in a few key locations (bunkers and command centers) and the electronic signals communication patterns of their activities in the build up to an expected air attack help track down their locations.
Prediction: the Pentagon, Mossad and Trump have something bigger planned for tonight if they don't comply. Watch the skies.
1) Infrastructure Bombing via power plants and bridges
2) He takes Kharg Island (he's said in the past he would take it if he were president)
3) Last minute deal with Iran cucking out (which doesn't seem like it's going to happen).
It might also be delayed, if it is, people will think he backed out. I'm just preparing for the unexpected.
Also I hope they find that leaker. That would've resulted in the guy getting killed, dangerous stuff.