Please. War is the crime. How its fought really only matters in the calculation of who wins or loses. Europeans tried to come up with some rules of mutual honor, and they worked, albeit imperfectly, when two western nations fought each other. Everyone else on the planet though? Not a chance.
Migger trying not to display bloodlusty sociopathy challenge: IMPOSSIBLE
You can stretch this logic to include anything. Poison the water supply to weaken the ability of a military to wage war. Destroy crops for the same reason. Bomb hospital because militaries need hospitals. Apartment blocks because personnel may go home to sleep at night. There's no limiting principle. It's very Talmudic. The end justifies the means because the other side is amalek.
Moot point argument because you're talking with retards that are fine with all of this
You are just realizing this now? Hell, when I was in the service and doing .50 cal training, they told us you are not allowed to use it on people because it would be a war crime to try and shoot someone with an anti aircraft gun. Instead, aim for their rifle and when asked say you were targeting equipment. It was "mostly" a joke, but a pertinent one.
We're not going to use nukes. We aren't even going to blow up the power plants. There are plenty of ways to take down a countries electrical grid without butt fucking them for a decade.
Even short terms electrical outages nation wide harm civilians greatly. Quit playing dumb
Not. Its inevitable. But if the plan is to send the Marines in to open up the straits of hormuz, Iran can't be in a functional position to respond. The lives of the Marines > enemy civilians. We are required to make allowance for civilians lives. Not sacrifice our operational ability and soldiers for them.
You think the Europoors and their American ideological brethren here know what a graphite bomb is?
Durrr you dont know merica bin dun warcrimes all da time.
This is why every country in NATO said "Good luck with that Iran thing, we're busy atm".
The live of a marine in an aggressive operation against civilians has no value at all
Who knows. They seem to think the Israel and the USA are going to take down the power gird by dropping a bunker buster right on the nuclear reactor core at Bushehr because we are just that stupid and evil.
Like a videogame right? Bing bing wahoo
Everybody knows what a graphite bomb is. Making distinction of the means when the short term result is the same is either autistic or plain dishonest
In all fairness, losing less than a dozen assets in a month isn't really something for the enemy to crow about. We've probably decommissioned more war machines in a week than this.
In my opinion anything relying on capitulation from the Iranians is a non-starter at the moment since the leaders keep getting converted into fine black particles, I'm not really sure how you would effectively ensure that all factions within the military would capitulate to US demands, but it's possible I'm missing something though; the only way to effectively suppress Iran is to completely decimate their resources/supply + logistics I think, which appears to be happening, so you would need solid evidence to prove that this is not the case which I understand is difficult as any evidence that can be solidly verified is effectively like showing your hand to the opponent which can only work if you have no chance of losing and doesn't align with Iran's doctrine of pretending that there's monsters in your closet since they're a vastly weaker opponent militarily
Great post bro thanks for telling us what's in the thread, retard