US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I'm assuming you have a source for this, right? First I've ever heard this claim - and I'll bet the same is true for pretty much everyone else ITT - so we'd really appreciate your educating us. We don't want to be left out of what we know.
There's no exact data unless you rely upon arrest data. What I could find was an article form Business Insider which cites a government website but the article on that government website is gone. Odds are that the data is still around somewhere just on a different government website. You could also refer to this paper from 2008 but I don't think it's specific to NYC in the 70s.
 
I know its retarded but theres a reason Laura Loomer is taking money for India now, I heard many zionist influences talk up India recently.

In a world that isnt reproducing, sheer population numbers become a source of power. India has the numbers that Israel can use as their front line fodder.
India likes Israel and tries to be allies with them because they fall under the same geo-umbrella of hating their Muslim neighbors.

India will literally take to anything that provides protection to them. They loved Trump first term because he shittalked their enemy China. When Biden came, they clinger to Russia hoping to make good with what they perceived as the new strong man.

I am sure Israel views India as the new wage slaves. They are highly “loyal” (ass-kissing) to a power that takes them in. They are perfect for Jewish CEO ego.
 
If Alberta gets enough signatures to leave, the referendum is scheduled to be two weeks before the US Midterms. That's bound to be a significant piece of news, and I think it might sway some votes for the midterm. How does the average American think about Canada shattering and which party would they want in charge while that's happenning?

What if that immediately means a pipeline is guaranteed to be built?
if Alberta were to join the US I'm pretty sure Canada would just collapse.
 
He's right. It is callous, but why should you be overly accommodating to countries that aren't looking out for your interests? Britain could have been expanding its North Sea LNG exploration efforts, but instead it doesn't seem to care. And at the same time, they've shut down all coal plants in the last few years. America has no need to protect a country that acts retarded while not even standing behind it.
 
I think there is a real possibility Canada's government won't allow them to leave.
Technically the Canadian federal government doesn't have a choice, all the proper procedures do is ensure a proper handover is done with trade and services negotiated and sorted out. It's perfectly possible for Alberta to crash out in a way that makes Brexit look planned and orderly, but that should be avoided if possible. Ottowa treats Alberta as a colony that they can tax without representation, and put in multiple measures to keep it that way. Alberta would be able to handle a disorderly exit better then Canada would.

if Alberta were to join the US I'm pretty sure Canada would just collapse.
Most likely. Canada is already pretty fragmented, with most interprovincial trade from the east to the west going through the States because Ottowa refuses to build a proper highway from Thunder Bay to Winnipeg. And people from the western provinces are basically locked out from the federal government and big buisness because French language proficiency is mandatory (they recently forced the CEO of a major airline to be fired because he didn't speak French in a condolence speech). After Alberta, BC and Saskatchewan are the biggest net contributors to the equalisation system and would be made to shoulder Alberta's burden, followed by Manitoba and those three are unlikely to stick around. Then Quebec is int he akward position of sticking around after making part of their identity wanting to leave, and the maritime provinces would probably be forced out in the end.
 
Última edición:
He's right. It is callous, but why should you be overly accommodating to countries that aren't looking out for your interests? Britain could have been expanding its North Sea LNG exploration efforts, but instead it doesn't seem to care. And at the same time, they've shut down all coal plants in the last few years. America has no need to protect a country that acts retarded while not even standing behind it.
Europe was a leader in fission for a long time but they gave up. It's sad. I suppose with ITER they're trying fusion but that's not going to be a profitable energy source with tokamaks, maybe ever.
 
>check any other thread outside of USPG2 talking about Trump
>everyone is in near-unanimous agreement that the writing is on the wall for him and that he has completely squandered our last chance to save America
>check USPG
>"everything is fine, don't pay attention to the people abandoning MAGA because of the retarded forever war"

I am once again begging people in this thread to just let it go already. Trump failed us all. It's over. Our future lies in the FEMA camps under God-Emperor Newsom.
I think you need to take a break from politics and log off, buddy.
 
Technically the Canadian federal government doesn't have a choice, all the proper procedures do is ensure a proper handover is done with trade and services negotiated and sorted out. It's perfectly possible for Alberta to crash out in a way that makes Brexit look planned and orderly, but that should be avoided if possible. Ottowa treats Alberta as a colony that they can tax without representation, and put in multiple measures to keep it that way. Alberta would be able to handle a disorderly exit better then Canada would.
Indian (First Nations) groups seem intent on opposing separatism (they say it would violate Indigenous treaties) which could complicate things and it would not be surprising if the Canadian government tried to drag out the process in a way that would ultimately see Alberta stay in Canada.
 
7 shekels have been deposited into your account.
Also, the actions of one group of scumbags does not negate the negative behavior of another. Nice false dichotomy.
My point is nobody seems to bitch as much about the eurofags which are objectively the worst of all. The islamics are slighty less worse, and the Israeliites are saints in comparison to both. Sue me Jew
 
Indian (First Nations) groups seem intent on opposing separatism (they say it would violate Indigenous treaties) which could complicate things and it would not be surprising if the Canadian government tried to drag out the process in a way that would ultimately see Alberta stay in Canada.
All the treaties do is give the natives a seat at the table in negotiations, it doesn't give them a veto.

But still, if Alberta gets to a separation vote then that would likely put strain on America with states like California threatening to leave if the Republicans win again (even though California's finances are so messed up they might implode because they seriously underestimated how fucked up they are). It would certainly fan any fires, especially if people get convinced that Alberta will become a State (it won't*) and add three permanently red votes.

* Alberta might become a territory like Puerto Rico to simplify trade and international politics but that isn't even a discussion yet. From what I'm hearing if Alberta wanted to join as a State the Democrats would make joining contingent on Puerto Rico becoming a State, possibly DC too.
 
Última edición:
Is it normal to fire multiple high ranking positions when you're winning a war overwhelmingly and actively moving more assets to?

Ver archivo adjunto 8798328
They're army and their not field officers, one was the head chaplin. The Army chief of staff was also involved in working to get rid of the Army's prepositioned fleet and replacing it with vaporware, so if we had to move heavy Army units, we'd have nothing immediately ready to go.
 
7 shekels have been deposited into your account.
Also, the actions of one group of scumbags does not negate the negative behavior of another. Nice false dichotomy.
As if jews and Jewish organizations aren't leading the charge in financing and facilitating the ethnic replacement of whites in their countries and aren't the main driving force in 90% of the liberal policies destroying the west spiritually and culturally.

Both muslims and jews want to kill you it's just Muslims want to do it fast and violently and jews want it to be slow and agonizing so you barely notice it happening till it's too late.
 
Both muslims and jews want to kill you it's just Muslims want to do it fast and violently and jews want it to be slow and agonizing so you barely notice it happening till it's too late.
Hindu indians are a much bigger and real threat than Jews are. This Jew hysteria is just a kind of mental illness similar to TDS. It's insane.

Got a negrating jewfag on me lol. Nice.
 
All the treaties do is give the natives a seat at the table in negotiations, it doesn't give them a veto.

But still, if Alberta gets to a seperation vote then that would likely put strain on America with states like California threatening to leave if the Republicans win again (even though California's finances are so messed up they might implode because they seriously underestimated how fucked up they are)
If things were to play out in such a way then California's government is free to try its hand at being more stupid then usual. America is not like Canada, let's just say that states do not effectively have a way to opt-out after they join.
 
Is it normal to fire multiple high ranking positions when you're winning a war overwhelmingly and actively moving more assets to?

Ver archivo adjunto 8798328
For Trump, yes. He was firing these guys every other week during his first term.

The brown people keep wish casting that Trump will fire Pete Hegseth but that's going to be a major no-go when he's already dealt with General Officer treachery constantly during his first term.
Why would he get rid of someone loyal, highly competent, and risk putting another Mark "I'm going to defect to China" Miley into that seat?

Elon and the tech bros are a part of the problem too. They might vote Republican since it's in their best interest now but they brought along all their H1B pajeets to Texas.
They're doing their satanic water poisoning rituals in a fucking desert where fresh water is a precious resource.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo