Culture New Data Shows Vast Majority of Americans Support Trans Rights - The research suggests that right-wing attacks on trans protections are not aligned with the country’s values.


As bills aiming to push transgender people out of public life pass through state legislatures nationwide, a new survey shows that most Americans — regardless of party, race or gender — believe that trans people deserve equal protection.

In a new survey of over 1,000 respondents, 85% of Americans believe that “transgender people should have the same rights and protection as everyone else.” The sentiment was agreed upon by 92% of Democrats, 76% of Republicans and 87% of independents. The survey was conducted by research firm SSRS and funded by the Human Rights Campaign Foundation.

The survey also found that over four in 10 Americans now know a trans person, a rise from just one in three in previous surveys, while 27% of Americans say that they regularly have conversations with trans people. Previous research has shown that knowing a trans person corresponds with increased support for trans issues.

A large majority of Americans agreed that trans people should be able to access the health care they need (89%), be protected from employment discrimination (79%), and protected from discrimination and harassment in schools (83%). Notably, a majority of Republicans believed that trans people should be protected from discrimination in both arenas, as well.

With each question, support for protections for trans people was highest among people who spoke with trans people regularly, higher among those who knew a trans person, and lowest among those who did not know a trans person

HRC underscored that these results point out that not only is support for trans equality broad nationwide, but that personal connection matters when it comes to protecting trans people’s rights.

“Transgender people are not strangers. They are our neighbors, coworkers, family members, and friends. And this new data shows that as people get to know them, they are more likely to stand by them as allies,” Kelley Robinson, President of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a press release accompanying the data.

Human Rights Campaign released the data to coincide with Trans Day of Visibility, the annual celebration of trans people’s existence. By the time that this year’s observance has rolled around, 747 anti-trans bills have been proposed in 42 states, per the Trans Legislation Tracker. Of those, 23 have passed and 47 have failed, with the remaining 677 still under consideration.

“American people are far more united than extremists will admit. We believe in fairness. We believe in dignity. And we believe in treating people equally under the law,” Robinson continued. “When one group is singled out and told they don’t belong, it weakens the foundation of freedom for everyone. That’s why defending trans rights is part of defending democracy itself. The more we show up for each other, the stronger our communities and our democracy become.”

The survey was conducted from February 20 through February 23 with 1,032 respondents over the internet and via telephone, with responses in English and Spanish. You can read the full results of the survey here.

Get the best of what’s queer. Sign up for Them’s weekly newsletter here.
 
What do you think?
If you want me to be completely honest; I think most data that's announced to the public is skewed at the very least if not a complete lie at worse. If there's anything from the media about public support, there's always a slant/skew and my only question is where it is. When it comes to academia/science, there's a massive problem of reproducibility, but get pushed/published by their so-called peers. Feel free to tell me it's a shit way to go through life, I'll agree, but anytime there's some sort of announcement about how people feel or shit like that, no, I don't fucking believe you. Casual reminder that Liberal Hellhole California voted to ban gay marriage in 2008 with Prop 8. The media would tell us how popular and everything the support for gays is/are, but even in California, turns out it wasn't that popular, not that they'll ever admit to that.
 
If you want me to be completely honest; I think most data that's announced to the public is skewed at the very least if not a complete lie at worse. If there's anything from the media about public support, there's always a slant/skew and my only question is where it is. When it comes to academia/science, there's a massive problem of reproducibility, but get pushed/published by their so-called peers. Feel free to tell me it's a shit way to go through life, I'll agree, but anytime there's some sort of announcement about how people feel or shit like that, no, I don't fucking believe you. Casual reminder that Liberal Hellhole California voted to ban gay marriage in 2008 with Prop 8. The media would tell us how popular and everything the support for gays is/are, but even in California, turns out it wasn't that popular, not that they'll ever admit to that.
>2008
>2008

Brother we are in 2026, did you step out of a time machine? And the big reason why prop 8 passed was big black turnout (due to Obama) who voted no.
 
>2008
>2008

Brother we are in 2026, did you step out of a time machine? And the big reason why prop 8 passed was big black turnout (due to Obama) who voted no.
I'm making the point that the lies have been consistent, and continued, even when proven false. They were lying back then, why would they stop now?
 
Maybe I'm in the minority here, but number 1: I don't believe a goddamn word these people are saying about this "survey". Especially from a publication named "them.us". And number 2: I fully support TTD in all shapes and forms. These degenerate loons deserve no rights or privileges whatsoever.


rkl95g6vvtha1.jpg
 
Yeah.
Right.

Q1 : Would you prefer to see your child put into a woodchipper OR support trans rights?

Ooh- look what my survey says you bigots...

Fuck the lot of them.
 
Normal person idea of trans rights: Weird fags that dress up as women shouldn't automatically be put in prison
Troon idea of trans rights: Everyone that thinks I shouldn't be allowed to pull out my dick in front of their daughter should be put in prison
This has been my idea (and probably most reasonable people's idea) since before this became an issue.

Consenting adults should be free to do whatever they want with other consenting adults without worrying about repercussions.

Supposedly, that's all they (first the gays, then the trannies) wanted. That, and to be "treated like everyone else."

Then once they got it, that wasn't enough. They had to have protected status, be allowed to impose their "lifestyle" on everyone else to include children, and now they want to impose it to the point that if you don't agree with it, you're the one who should be treated like you're abnormal.

If they really wanted to not be in prison and just be treated like everyone else, they should have just STFU.
 
The only trans rights I'm interested in is them fucking off and leaving everyone else alone. But since that's never going to happen as they're driven to make everyone approve of them of their lifestyle and choices, this leaves me with encouraging them to undertake Canadian Healthcare.
 
I am dead certain that I can take the same poll into a small, regional martial arts tournament, where there’s easily three thousand people in attendance and competing, and I’d get the response that yeah, they deserve the same rights as everyone else, but fuck ‘em if they think a tranny should compete with a woman…because you know the FTMs for God damn sure aren’t going to square up to men.

there was no call for "trans rights" because they had the same rights everyone else had. It's weird how that changed when turning weirdo freaks into a bludgeon to beat people down and suddenly they are untouchable because "trans rights" became "trans privilege to freely trample other's rights and they just have to take it" and now that that's the case there are suddenly a gajillion trannies?
Yet another front on which the Left pretends not to understand something in order to paint their opponents as using bad faith.

“Why would they lie?” Is the most disingenuous thing anyone says, and should be fucking slapped anytime someone says it, as if lying were punished by death so no one would ever do it.

The fact is, the backlash comes from the fact that transgenderism was not pressure tested before authority figures started demanding acceptance of these fucking weirdos. In @Professor G. Raff’s example, we used to laugh at them in sitcoms. I’m surprised they haven’t started claiming it was blackface.

In a society where people demand DEI policies to get ahead, you’d deny that claiming being trans doesn’t yield some sort of reward? Fuck out of here with that.
 
That is minority of the population, in fact, I think that is a micro minority. You are using a false positive survey to push your narrative HRC.
If, IF, the sample population is randomly sampled, it matters little if the sample is tiny compared to the actual population, what matters most is the absolute size of the sample.
 
Then once they got it, that wasn't enough. They had to have protected status, be allowed to impose their "lifestyle" on everyone else to include children, and now they want to impose it to the point that if you don't agree with it, you're the one who should be treated like you're abnormal.
And on top of that they wanted things that you can't possibly legislate in a normal, non-scifi-dystopia world. Like our very thoughts. I'll say all the pronouns, but you know that I know you know I know and so therefore I should be unpersoned.
 
even my Boomer TDS riddled relatives have not only brought them up unprompted to speak negatively, but they're also weirdly mad over the men in women's sports thing especially.
The rabid libtards I know are mysteriously silent on the trans in womens sports issue, including someone who worked at a high level in the Obama administration and another who was an executive at a top lefty NGO/think tank. They blab endlessly about every other lefty issue, but act like this one doesn't exist. It's telling.
 
Then ask the specifics: Should transvestites have the right to be addressed as women, use women's bathrooms and compete in women's sports?
Those are the only "rights" they lack.
Speak for yourself. Me and the homies want these mentally ill faggots stripped of their rights and put into an asylum. I'm past the point of appeasement.
They shouldn't have employment rights. If an employer is stupid enough to hire one, that's on them, but employers should not be forced to have a mentally ill crossdresser on the payroll.
 
You know you're right, I should've been more specific. Namely, if you want a true metric, it needs to be truly random. The problem being, phone/Internet needs more specifics.
Shits never truly random, not even in statistics classes where they literally make up their own data just to teach you the lesson and they have the power to just declare it all random due to it being made up for learning.

Every single statistics problem. The first thing the teacher demanded was an SRS check.

Every single answer. The first thing we had to write was "SRS: Not given. But we shall assume..." ASS U ME

It actually would have been awesome if it all built up to a question on the final, like they finally give a problem with data that is explicitly not random and the correct full points answer was "SRS: No. The premise is invalid and we do not proceed with analysis". And if you act a fool and math it anyways, BAM instant F!

But nope, statistics is all about huffing farts about how math is totally objective and not just another way to lie, so they never actually acknowledge that there are samples that are not random and should not be analyzed. They'd rather train the sheeple to assume all samples are SRS by default.

Or if we go beyond statistics and analysis: not even RNG is random, once you learn what a "seed" is.

That being said, even if randomness is not random, people who are legitimately trying to understand the world and not manipulate you 🌈 should strive to be as random and unbiased as possible. And as you said, things all too often end up as convenience samples instead. Convenient both in the sense of "whatever is easiest to gather" and "it just so happens to fit a narrative" and if it doesn't, the data never gets published.
 
This has always been the motte and Bailey argument with trans rights

These are the questions:
Screenshot_20260401_095221_Chrome.jpg

Of course the majority of people think things like Trans kids deserve protection from harassment in schools in a generalized sense.

These surveys start falling apart when you start asking specific questions (which this one does not):
-Do you think kids should be able to change their name and gender at school without their parents knowledge?
-Do you think kids can use the bathroom and locker rooms of the opposite sex ?
-Do you think transgender girls should play on female sports teams ?

Those will all be majority NO

I suspect that gays are back in charge at HRC instead of trannies because this framing is more in line with early 2000s gay rights than late 2010s tranny activism. I think its a bit naive because the second they gain a little footing again the trannies will come back screaming.
 
They really buried the actual result paper within the 2ndary link used in the article. Here's the link for it.


One interesting thing is that more people disagreed about trans people if they didn't attend college.

One thing I also don't see mentioned is that people might be agreeing because there's social pressure to agree with the status quo regardless of if they claim to say the study is anonymous or not. It's like your boss asking you to fill out a job survey about the workplace, you're kind of obligated to either ignore it entirely or answer falsely, I understand this study was done online but again that would be worse because the people that already agree with trans rights will be looking for things like this to affirm. I've been sent studies before like this from online companies and they usually tell you what the study is for. Most people that don't agree will just ignore it.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo