🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.

Doe v. Bonnell 1:25-cv-20757 — District Court, S.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    1:25-cv-20757
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. Florida
  • Filed
    17 de Feb, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    440 Civil Rights: Other
  • Cause
    28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Defendant
  • Last Filing
    22 de Jul, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Steven Bonnell, II, Jane Doe

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 369)

# Date Description Filing
284 22 de Jul, 2026 PAPERLESS ORDER RESETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby RESET before the undersigned on Wednesday, August 19, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 7/23/2026. (dgj) (Entered: 07/23/2026)
22 de Jul, 2026  
280 29 de Jun, 2026 PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby SET before the undersigned on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra (drn) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
29 de Jun, 2026  
29 de Jun, 2026 SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 279 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (2213918)
It's also that Israel is a very non-committed ally, where we extend support to Israel where none is returned. Atleast the Gulf states take the effort to justify their relationship with investments in the U.S. economy, which Israel doesn't do. I would support Israel if they started justifying their alliance with mutual support of the United States.
I mean Israel does do something. As far as I know the cooperation is mostly on intelligence, military training and technology. Its companies also invest in the US

They don't have an investment fund like the Gulf countries so they cannot dump 1.3 Trillion to the US since Israeli companies are private. As for military cooperation, my guess is that Israel is so unpopular including them in most coalitions is unfeasible. Imagine if they joined the coalition against ISIS and 2 weeks later university campuses in the west are waiving the ISIS flag.

Of course, the elephant in the room; money sent to Israel. Total bullshit, even Netanyahu is against it.
 
Destiny seething about how he's burning through his money due to being demonetized on YouTube, Kick not paying him like they used to
The funny thing about this is Destiny doxxing JSTLK and harassing Chaeiry in his chat was probably the biggest chance of him getting banned from Kick, but because JSTLK is a humongous cuckold he didn't even try and report him for anything.
The PV account is mocking Destiny. DGJeets seething in the comments.
Destiny has been attacking PV for a while now and tried to character assassinate Wicked Supreme (current? PV employee) and Pxie (former? PV employee)
1774819943855.png
(he said more shit but I'm not going back to find all of that shit)
footsoldier gets the answers he sought, only to wish he hadn’t asked. Must be very exciting when dear leader comes to your rescue
It's very funny watching retarded footsoldiers try and argue about the case, but the people arguing with them are normally really bad at it. There are multiple other women accusing him of doing the same thing (it's not really an accusation when their fucking faces are in videos), recordings from his pocket, etc. etc. His actual legal defense is not that he didn't do it, but that he did it when it technically wasn't illegal yet. Reputation RESTORED!

r/Destiny is upset that they're not harassing progressive victory enough:

"DGG Needs to Stop Getting Taken Advantage Of "
1774820624102.png
"We're fine that Dylan Burns and Soypill are cooperating with them???"

Just incredible stuff here folks:
"the accusation of just sharing a sex tape"
1774821030260.png
https://www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1s5vwvm/dgg_needs_to_stop_getting_taken_advantage_of/ / https://archive.ph/5gvr2

Give it to me straight guys, is the sex offender getting off the hook?
He will probably "win" the civil case, yeah. There's an active (as far as we know) police investigation into him secretly recording Chaeiry, but that's been going on for over a year now so is likely dead. Realistically the only thing that was ever going to happen to him was reputational damage and the little fallout from that was mostly self imposed.
 
Última edición:
Just incredible stuff here folks:
"the accusation of just sharing a sex tape"
1774821030260.png
“Meanwhile, Hasan has openly talked about sharing nudes with friends… But for Destiny, it almost destroyed his career and so many people left the community.”

Even if you grant that it was gross of Hasan to open random Snapchat messages from fans while he was sitting with friends, it would obviously be a HUGE (potentially career destroying) issue if he had sent a video of Valkyrie sucking his cock to a random underaged girl he was sexting, without Valkyries knowledge.

How do these tards even begin to think the two situations are in the same ballpark at all?
 
Última edición:
He will probably "win" the civil case, yeah. There's an active (as far as we know) police investigation into him secretly recording Chaeiry, but that's been going on for over a year now so is likely dead. Realistically the only thing that was ever going to happen to him was reputational damage and the little fallout from that was mostly self imposed.
I mean if this goes to trial it will depend on the jury demographic. Most would absolutely want him assraped and could do so (tho tbf the rape amount would prob be from no further costs to maybe the 150k - for me the real win would be being able to legaly call him liable for revenge porn etc.). However, this will be me if the jury has as much as a single jeet (in that case the judge will absolve him, grant immunity for life, jail the whole thread and declare war on pakistan).
1000032217.jpg
 
someone needs to take over the tiny vs tiny twitter account, since it seems like they might have just stopped posting, or make a new one that's better at farming engagement. this one btw: https://x.com/tiny_vs_tiny

i would imagine there's so many good videos that could be made from him talking about his legal case, or showing him doxxing people then whining about people doing shit that's objectively way less severe to him.


also looking at the replies to some of these, i just dont get why these people even like destiny, while also attempting to go after like hasan for shit that's completely made up. like people just lying about the brothel he went to and claiming they were sex trafficking minors, which they all know isn't true, yet destiny was literally asking a minor who he himself claims was being sex trafficked, for explicit videos of her being sex trafficked, and also sending videos of him jacking off to her (btw it's so funny that he thinks any woman or young girl would ever want to see a video of him high out of his mind off of vyvanse, furiously tugging on his fucked up weird ass penis, let alone get off to it, what a complete fucking retard). and he also admitted on some podcast that he paid for sex from a prostitute who couldnt speak english, and then immediately after that he says that she was probably being sex trafficked.

there's so many other examples of this too that i see constantly, of destiny fans feigning outrage about hasan or whoever for something that isn't even true a lot of the time, and that destiny is almost always actually guilty of every single time. have they just been fans for too long and at this point they feel like there's a sunk cost thing going on, or stockholm syndrome or what the fuck. surely they dont actually find him entertaining or funny because he isn't and i dont think he even attempts being funny anymore, and he's just such a vile, evil motherfucker that doesnt give a fuck about anyone else and doesnt value human life:
 
Notice how quickly he shifted from "He didn't do it" to "Well she did it as well!"?
If only he was intelligent enough to understand that he is basically admitting that Tiny is guilty.
That's the DGG-jutsu, when in unfavourable position always pivot or call the other person retarded. Preferably both at the same time.

Destiny is actually a really bad debater because he starts out with evil principles. If he actually digs in and defends his positions, its alwasy a disaster (advocating for carpet bombing Mexico, defending CP, defending Israel). All he and his audience can do is constantly pivot until the opponent gets tired and slips up, then they focus on that.

I'm so happy that Tiny never made it to mainstream.
To this day I remember the cringe I felt when I heard his voice on public transport, when some retard was listening to his 'debate' with Shapiro on train. You can guess the ethnicity of said viewer. Or when I heard him name dropped on campus. Or when I saw his blue hair on big screen as relatives were watching Peterson stuff.

I wonder if it keeps him up at night. How close he was to success (outpacing Hasan). At some point he was almost as relevant as Hasan, talking with big names. He probably thought, "if I carry on like this for one more year, I will be bigger than Hasan. Surely I will shake Biden's hand soon. And after that - media company with Lauren, my beloved. And once I have my media empire, I can become the biggest sex pest in the world history!" .

Instead, all this to end up with the same viewership as Vaush, and Vaush, once again, outpacing him, this time financially - he actually makes money from youtube. On top of it, Vaush does not deposit thousands of dollars into Mr Brettler's bank account every month, instead purchases goblin drawings. It probably works out cheaper.
 
I mean if this goes to trial it will depend on the jury demographic. Most would absolutely want him assraped and could do so (tho tbf the rape amount would prob be from no further costs to maybe the 150k - for me the real win would be being able to legaly call him liable for revenge porn etc.). However, this will be me if the jury has as much as a single jeet (in that case the judge will absolve him, grant immunity for life, jail the whole thread and declare war on pakistan).
Ver archivo adjunto 8777406
spoiler this shit
 
As far as I know the cooperation is mostly on intelligence, military training and technology.
It's more like the United States cooperates with Israel against the enemies of Israel. Israel does not cooperate with us because they don't have our bests interests in mind and never had.
Its companies also invest in the US
Meaningless. Israel is unable to justify our assistance unlike the Gulf states. Sure, Israel can't finance the U.S. like Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E., but then that begs the question for what reason are we so adament about protecting them?
As for military cooperation, my guess is that Israel is so unpopular including them in most coalitions is unfeasible.
Only thing I agree with. Iran did a good job in getting the world to hate Israel and drawing out the Zionist puppet strings for all to see. I'm for certain that they astroturf people like Destiny.
 
Pxie getting under her sexpest nemesis’ skin again in the early AM:

Ver archivo adjunto 8774647

Good to see Destiny eager for trial now, for so long he was delusionally praying the case would be dismissed in 1-2 weeks. But that celebrity lawyer for sex offenders isn’t getting any cheaper, so can’t blame D for being in a rush now that his MTD and SJ are filed.

Ver archivo adjunto 8774676
Ver archivo adjunto 8774680

footsoldier gets the answers he sought, only to wish he hadn’t asked. Must be very exciting when dear leader comes to your rescue
Is Destiny really trying to say that Pxie's complaints are unprecedented?
 
mean if this goes to trial it will depend on the jury demographic.
Also depends on what they are allowed to show the jury.

This is where deleting all the logs can be bad for Destiny. I think unless Pxie's team is that outmatched, the judge will allow them to play things like the Foodshops-Destiny convo on recreating the logs for example. Destiny sounded scared and spastic during the conversation. Normal people are going to assume he is hiding his guilt and the judge can tell the jury they are allowed to assume he removed things. Even if the judge doesn't, that's the default thought to normal people when they see him freaking out in a convo with a weird trans.
 
Is Destiny really trying to say that Pxie's complaints are unprecedented?
He is saying that there is no precedent for the continuous disclosure argument which is frankly fucking retarded.
If you upload something somewhere like a google drive then you are distributing it as long as it's up.
What he is saying right now is essentially that he didn't actually have to go DFE on his discord chats because even if the video of pixie sucking on his worm was still up there in Rose's(and probably someone else's too) chats it would be perfectly fine since he sent it before the law came into the effect.
 
He is saying that there is no precedent for the continuous disclosure argument which is frankly fucking retarded.
If you upload something somewhere like a google drive then you are distributing it as long as it's up.
What he is saying right now is essentially that he didn't actually have to go DFE on his discord chats because even if the video of pixie sucking on his worm was still up there in Rose's(and probably someone else's too) chats it would be perfectly fine since he sent it before the law came into the effect.
*You see your honor, the publish date on that pornhub video(that is still accessible) was before the cutoff date for the law therefore I am not guilty*
 
Apologies if I'm late and/or gay, but a video game came out about a week and a half ago mocking streamer culture. It actually has some pretty deep cut references, but I couldn't not laugh at our blue-haired Steven ("legally distinct Destiny") who sits on a corner bed and whose mission revolves around you helping him un-cuck himself
(I timestamped the link but if it fails out as it sometimes does, starts at around 1:13:50)

DesTINY.png

Somehow even more off-putting than in real life (maybe?)
 
Última edición:
I have watched a bit of Destiny lately and his streams have mostly been about Hasan and reading and watching things on Hasan. /r/Destiny has also been fixated on Hasan and there are about 7 threads on Hasan alone on the front page. Destiny and his community is a Hasan snarker subreddit now.
 
Eddy woke up (apparently just in time to not get "flagged" as a lazy fuck):

223 - ORDER denying [84] Motion for Protective Order Governing Public Commentary by Trial Participants
This was Plaintiff's motion. Not a great look for Pxie's lawyers, as they seem to not understand the legal implications (it's a First Amendment issue) and on top of that they reference a lot of inapposite case law the judge then has to correct them on.

  • The court denied Plaintiff Jane Doe’s motion for a protective order that would have restricted public commentary by trial participants, including the defendant.
  • Plaintiff wanted a broad order barring participants from making public statements that were allegedly harassing, derogatory, threatening, or that disclosed sensitive allegations, confidential settlement discussions, or the identities of sealed witnesses.
  • The court viewed that request as a gag order and prior restraint on speech, which triggers First Amendment concerns.
  • The judge held that Rule 26 protective orders apply to discovery matters, not to broad restrictions on speech outside discovery.
  • The court noted that a separate discovery protective order had already been entered, so concerns about confidential discovery material were already addressed elsewhere.
  • Plaintiff relied heavily on criminal-case precedent involving the Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury, but the court said those authorities do not fit this civil case, which is governed by the Seventh Amendment.
  • The court emphasized that in criminal cases, speech restrictions may sometimes be justified to protect a defendant’s fair-trial rights, but that same constitutional basis is not present here.
  • Even assuming a gag-order analysis could apply, the proposed order was not narrowly tailored and was not the least restrictive means available.
  • The judge found several proposed restrictions too vague and open to interpretation, such as bans on “derogatory” statements or “mischaracterizing” filings.
  • The order concludes that granting Plaintiff’s request would create an unconstitutional precedent for regulating speech in civil litigation whenever a party has a public platform.

225 - ORDER denying [113] Motion for Order to Show Cause ; denying [127] Sealed Motion for Order to Show Cause.
Plaintiff's motion. It was apparently a-ok for Destiny to go on Foodstamp's stream and read from the then-sealed transcript.

  • The court denied Plaintiff’s motion to hold Defendant in contempt and to impose sanctions or injunctive relief.
  • Plaintiff argued Defendant violated the court’s earlier order by publicly discussing a temporarily sealed hearing transcript.
  • The court clarified that its earlier order only directed the clerk to keep the transcript sealed temporarily pending further order; it did not make the broader findings Plaintiff attributed to it.
  • The court later denied Plaintiff’s motion to seal the transcript, finding the hearing was public, the transcript did not reveal identifying information warranting sealing, and much of the allegedly private information was already on the public docket.
  • Because Plaintiff filed the contempt motion before the court issued its later sealing ruling, the motion was premature.
  • Once the court later refused to keep the transcript sealed, Plaintiff’s contempt request—based on the temporary seal—became moot.

We also get a Motion in limine from each side, where they basically ask for things the other side should not be allowed to use during trial:

222 - Defendant's MOTION in Limine to Preclude Argument and Evidence and Prevent Plaintiff's Use of a Pseudonym at Trial
Destiny doesn't want the AbbyMC or "Rose was 17" evidence to be admissible in court. He also wants Jane Doe status to be revoked for trial (so he can inflict maximum damage unto his victim).
1774970360933.png

  • Defendant filed an omnibus motion in limine asking the court to exclude three categories of evidence/argument before trial.
  • First, Defendant seeks to bar any claim, testimony, or argument that he sent the video to a minor, arguing the allegation is false, not in the amended complaint, irrelevant to Plaintiff’s claims, and highly prejudicial.
  • Second, Defendant asks the court to exclude Abbymc’s declaration, attached exhibit, and any future testimony or evidence from Abbymc, arguing Plaintiff’s side obstructed access to her during discovery and prevented meaningful testing of her claims.
  • He contends Abbymc ignored a subpoena, that Plaintiff’s counsel refused to facilitate service and allegedly provided a fake address, and that allowing her evidence now would be unfair.
  • Defendant also argues the Abbymc exhibit is inadmissible hearsay, unauthenticated, ambiguous, and of little probative value.
  • Third, Defendant asks the court to stop Plaintiff from using a pseudonym at trial, arguing anonymity before a jury would unfairly prejudice him by implying Plaintiff deserves special protection or victim status.
  • He argues Plaintiff has already placed herself and the case into the public sphere through online posts, fundraising, and public commentary, which undermines the basis for continued anonymity.
  • In the alternative, Defendant asks the court to require Plaintiff to make a renewed, evidence-based showing that pseudonymity remains justified at the trial stage.

224 - Plaintiff's MOTION in Limine by Jane Doe
1774970148454.png

  • Plaintiff filed an omnibus motion in limine seeking to exclude several categories of evidence and argument before trial.
  • Plaintiff argues the central trial issue is whether Defendant disclosed the video without her explicit consent, and says Defendant is trying to distract from that question with irrelevant and prejudicial theories.
  • First, Plaintiff asks the court to bar any argument that she impliedly consented to disclosure, arguing the governing statute requires explicit consent and that implied consent is not a valid defense.
  • Second, Plaintiff seeks to exclude evidence or argument about her alleged sexual history or sexual predisposition, contending it is barred by Rule 412 and would unfairly prejudice and embarrass her.
  • Third, Plaintiff asks the court to bar Defendant from relying on self-generated spreadsheets, logs, and reconstructed records as supposedly conclusive proof that no disclosure occurred, arguing those materials are unreliable, unauthenticated, and potentially misleading.
  • Plaintiff also argues Defendant should not be allowed to characterize those records as complete or definitive proof of non-disclosure.
  • Fourth, Plaintiff seeks to exclude Defendant’s “catfishing” defense, arguing that even if someone other than the intended recipient accessed the account, that does not negate disclosure under the statute.
  • Plaintiff says all of these categories should be excluded because they are irrelevant, misleading, confusing, and unfairly prejudicial under the Federal Rules of Evidence.

We can probably expect a flurry of rulings now that Eddy is finally throwing some attention this way.
 

Archivos adjuntos

Última edición:
Pxie has always been a dumb unreliable bitch, and the fact that this lawsuit is falling apart at the seams is just further evidence that leveraging her to stick it to Destiny was stupid. All the orbiters are slowly but surely crawling back, the attack dogs have been dissipated, Hasan is focused on Asmongold more that Destiny, and Destiny is basically in the clear to gaslight his way back into the mainstream. Fuck this bitch and fuck Destiny.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo