US ‘He’s lied about everything’: Iran war puts Trump on shaky ground with young MAGA men - Their frustrations and anger with the conflict were on full display at CPAC this week, although Sharty refugees would probably tell them to post hands

webp.webp '
Attendees chant in support of the Iranian opposition and thank President Donald Trump during the Conservative Political Action Conference in Grapevine, Texas, on March 26, 2026.

GRAPEVINE, TEXAS — Joseph Bolick feels betrayed by President Donald Trump. And it’s because of the war in Iran.

The 30-year-old Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran voted for Trump in 2024. But at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference gathering this week he sported a hat emblazoned with “America First” — a slogan Trump championed during his campaign, along with the promise not to start new wars in foreign countries.

“He’s lied about everything,” said Bolick. “If you go into a war where there’s no end game, how is it going to end? There’s no clear objective.”

Bolick is part of a cohort of young MAGA loyalists who are increasingly frustrated with Trump over the war in Iran. While Trump’s decision to join Israel in attacking Iran has rallied war hawks and his older supporters, it has alienated many of the young men who swung toward the GOP in 2024. That split is resonating among not only the rank-and-file, but also conservative media influencers and some corners of the White House.

The generational divide was on stark display at CPAC, the annual conservative base-rallying gathering, where some young MAGA loyalists expressed deep frustration and even anger at the Trump administration’s choice to reignite conflict in the Middle East. One month into the war, Trump’s shaky ground with young men threatens to fracture an already-fragile GOP coalition ahead of a hostile midterm in November.

At the conference in north Texas, some attendees carried around Iranian flags, pledging loyalty to the U.S. mission overseas, while others donned America First hats and preached about the need for anti-interventionism.

“Trump and Republicans in general are going to have major issues in the midterms, in 2028, if we can’t wrap this up in a relatively quick amount of time,” said 21-year-old Andrew Belcher, president of the Ohio College Republicans. He added that Trump is doing “relatively poorly” with hyper online young men who are influenced heavily by media figures like Tucker Carlson and other isolationists in the GOP.

A POLITICO poll this month found that Trump voters largely continue to back him. But men who self-identified as “MAGA Republicans” and voted for Trump in 2024 are deeply split by generation over their trust in the president and their view of the war, especially if the number of U.S. casualties rises.

The contrast was striking, even with the larger margins of error that come from the smaller sample sizes: More than 70 percent of those over 35 believe Trump has a plan, compared with 49 percent of those under 35. A 66 percent majority of older MAGA men are willing to sacrifice American lives in order for the U.S. to achieve its goals in Iran, compared with less than half of younger MAGA men who say the same. And the younger men are significantly less likely to say the war is aligned with MAGA principles and in the interests of American people.

Some of the most prominent MAGA voices are opposed to the Iran war, like Carlson and Megyn Kelly, along with influential figures like Joe Rogan, who holds tremendous sway with young men. There’s even growing consternation among younger, more-right wing White House staffers, said one person familiar with the dynamics who was granted anonymity to discuss them.

“They’re very frustrated. They didn’t love the war to start with, and since it began, the constantly contradictory messaging from the president himself, is just brutal, brutal for staff to deal with and making their life really hard,” the person said. “He puts his people in a really tough position, especially people who are public-facing.”

“What matters most to the American people – including young men – is having a Commander-in-Chief who takes decisive action to eliminate threats and keep them safe, which is exactly what President Trump is doing with the ongoing successful Operation Epic Fury,” said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle.

Part of CPAC’s intent, a hallmark grassroots gathering that has been held for more than 50 years, is to hype up conservatives, a particularly important mission for party leaders in critical election years. If Republicans want to prevent Democrats from flipping the House this midterm cycle, they need to ensure they don’t lose any gains they made with key parts of their coalition in 2024, namely young men.

“We need you,” said former RNC chair Michael Whatley, who is running for Senate in North Carolina. “We need every conservative, every Republican, every patriot across this country to focus on two things: get out the vote and protect the ballot.”

Mercedes Schlapp, senior fellow for the CPAC Foundation, opened Thursday’s session by pleading with conservatives to remain united. “We cannot divide from within,” she cautioned attendees.

But interviews with a dozen young men at CPAC revealed broad concern that Trump is imperiling the U.S. economy, which has seen spiking gas and fuel prices caused by the war.

“A lot of the young generation feels that there’s just not a lot of hope for the economy,” said a 30-year old attendee who was granted anonymity to speak freely about party dynamics.

Onstage and in hallway conversations, older attendees celebrated Trump for ending what they called a 47-year conflict in Iran, marked by the death of Iran’s supreme leader.

A panel featuring Iranian women speaking about human rights abuses was met with loud cheers from the audience. Scores of mostly older conservatives milled about wearing shirts with the image of exiled Iran Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, who is set to speak at the conference on Saturday.

“I believe President Trump’s shock and awe is what they needed,” said Lawrence Ligas, a 63-year-old conservative Chicago activist who was pardoned by Trump for charges related to the Jan. 6 insurrection. “Young MAGA is causing this divide because they’re concerned about being drafted.”

Multiple speakers on stage both directly and indirectly roasted online influencers for their opposition to the war. Conservative political commentator Josh Hammer blasted Carlson and Kelly in particular as “doomsayers.”

In his speech, former Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz told the audience that “dissent and disagreement has to be allowed. Tucker Carlson isn’t going anywhere.” Gaetz, who resigned in 2024 after being briefly nominated by Trump for attorney general, then warned about the risks of military occupation in Iran.

“A ground invasion of Iran will make our country poorer and less safe,” the 43-year-old said. “It will mean higher gas prices, higher food prices. And I’m not sure if we would end up killing more terrorists than we would create.”

[L/A]
 
We'd need to start seeing this take from actual MAGA sources (not RINOs or standard right-leaning media) before I'd really believe it based on what I've seen online.

I see some republicans condemning this war, true, but it's not really the MAGA Trump supporters. I see the MAGA wing of the party saying this is fine as long as it doesn't turn into an Iraq War style nation building occupation. They're supporting air bombing, naval war and securing Khard island.

This war is definitely making some of the MAGA types nervous, but I don't really see a lot of them changing their minds or condemning this way...yet...
But finding actual MAGA sources might be more hard than finding an needle in a haystack.
 
Come on, we all now what a MAGA source is: a liberal shithead claiming that MAGA is losing its mind over whatever it is they declare MAGA is losing its mind over today.
I don’t know what a MAGA source would be. OANN? Karoline Leavitt directly? Just Trump tweets? It isn’t the twitter guys half of them had tweets saying the opposite shit six months before doing a 180 when the narrative changed like Catturd or Gunther Eagleman.
 
They're already talking about landing troops on that one island. It was over the moment Bibi gave Trump that golden pager after pager bombing Hezbollah, to remind him who really rules. The first reminder probably came after Butler, PA. I'd bet some Mossad people gave him a little chat. "Yeah goy, we'll let you do some things you want. But you're our monkey and you will advance Greater Israel for us"
 
Gas prices are up 35% the stock market is down nearly 10% and mortgage rates are nearing 7% on fears of a global recession caused directly by the guy who ran on no new wars, cost of living and the economy. I was thrilled trump won but if you aren't at least questioning why we are starting a global conflagration for a subversive ally who never even fought beside us in the war on terror or in Iraq then you are most certainly a terminally online retard with no skin in the game. It's very easy to cheer on WW3 when you live with your parents and spend 14 hours a day bitching about 2015 era culture war crap.
 
The thing is that US politics are a big contest between Democrats and Republicans for who can take the most Ls and self destroy the hardest. Democrats will take this W and quickly turn it into a L by failing to capitalize into it properly and instead push more trannies and illegals which lost them 2024.
 
Gas prices are up 35% the stock market is down nearly 10% and mortgage rates are nearing 7% on fears of a global recession caused directly by the guy who ran on no new wars, cost of living and the economy. I was thrilled trump won but if you aren't at least questioning why we are starting a global conflagration for a subversive ally who never even fought beside us in the war on terror or in Iraq then you are most certainly a terminally online retard with no skin in the game. It's very easy to cheer on WW3 when you live with your parents and spend 14 hours a day bitching about 2015 era culture war crap.
Silence Canadian
 
I'm starting to think the only difference between groypers and euroscum is a censensual level on the aggressive homosexual brown sex.
 
Story's off Politico. Take with a large grain of salt.
We'd need to start seeing this take from actual MAGA sources (not RINOs or standard right-leaning media) before I'd really believe it based on what I've seen online.
:story:
I am done here.
Could you let me know what news sources you trust for unbiased reporting? It seems like anything that's critical of/negative about Trump gets dismissed as if it's an opinion piece from the Huffington Post, regardless of source.
 
It's a Politico article, and its goal is to drive the wedge deeper. But just because this is the case doesn't mean the wedge isn't there. The administration is burning large amounts of credibility with its young voters, while it is carrying water for the same neocons who were never there for Trump, don't align with his agenda, and don't have his best interests in mind. Attacks on the "podcast bros" are indirect attacts on young MAGA voters. Purging conservative institutions of young staffers is a direct attack on a future generation of potential Republican politicians. Indirect attacks on Vance and people who might be key players in a Vance administration are deliberate attacks on MAGA's future. Above all, any time not focused on deportations and dismantling the left's political machinery with tools like DOGE is time wasted, and a loss that will come back with interest in the midterms and 2028. There is very little time in four years, and Iran is sucking up a lot of that time on bullshit.

Sure, Politico is exploiting an opportunity because it is a leftist rag. But that opportunity isn't of their making.
 
Could you let me know what news sources
I'm definitely not saying they're unbiased, but you can find the MAGA news sources at Breitbart, Hot Air, and blogs they quote. Also look for youtube channels that broadcast Trump rallies during the election and have continued MAGA-oriented news sources. Then you can look at whatever they're quoting for poll sources and interviews, etc, and evaluate whether those seem like reliable sources.

To get a feel for what MAGA is actually saying, look at the pro-MAGA sources instead of Huff Po or the old neocon blogs/organizations.
 
Could you let me know what news sources you trust for unbiased reporting? It seems like anything that's critical of/negative about Trump gets dismissed as if it's an opinion piece from the Huffington Post, regardless of source.
The war is obviously controversial among Americans, this is a fact, the economic situation is also problematic, but many of the sources are full on TDS stupidity, some actually doing apologia for the Islamic Republic, saying an hypothetical overthrow of it only benefits Israel (As if Iran was not a source of problems in the Middle East), or the laughable "sources familiar with the matter"
 
We'd need to start seeing this take from actual MAGA sources (not RINOs or standard right-leaning media) before I'd really believe it based on what I've seen online.

I see some republicans condemning this war, true, but it's not really the MAGA Trump supporters. I see the MAGA wing of the party saying this is fine as long as it doesn't turn into an Iraq War style nation building occupation. They're supporting air bombing, naval war and securing Khard island.

This war is definitely making some of the MAGA types nervous, but I don't really see a lot of them changing their minds or condemning this way...yet...
Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin are the "MAGA sources" now.
 
Could you let me know what news sources you trust for unbiased reporting?
Every news outlet is biased.
It seems like anything that's critical of/negative about Trump gets dismissed as if it's an opinion piece from the Huffington Post, regardless of source.
I am not doing any such thing.

I stated that I was not going to go further than a POLITICO poll. Now that I have had to revisit and actually looked into the poll they would have been better served attributing it or at least giving credit to the company they used to run it because it is not as big of a scam as most polls in articles tend to be. It should be mentioned that the company that conducted the poll is British.

If you would like my opinion on why sources are generally dismissed on this part of the site I could hazard a guess. Many people have limited experience with those sources and what they do see here is almost uniformly negative and often just a hint shady. Politico is kind of more balanced in that they will actually publish positive stories about Trump and Republicans but in general they do their best to trash him at every turn.

As for why I would not exactly trust this article and its findings completely:
There’s even growing consternation among younger, more-right wing White House staffers, said one person familiar with the dynamics who was granted anonymity to discuss them.
Politico has been caught multiple times over decades putting out hot goss from sources familiar only for that information turned out to be less goss and more steaming piles of shit.

An additional reason to not trust Politico is that they pushed the 51 intel officials bullshit and to my knowlege have never corrected or retracted their reporting.
But interviews with a dozen young men at CPAC revealed broad concern that Trump is imperiling the U.S. economy, which has seen spiking gas and fuel prices caused by the war.

“A lot of the young generation feels that there’s just not a lot of hope for the economy,” said a 30-year old attendee who was granted anonymity to speak freely about party dynamics.
Not one quote that confirms that concern though? Even the quote from a mystery person is not specific to Iran or even Trump or even a party.

A dozen interviews and one quote. Gosh I wonder why they only went with the general no hope one.

Now just moving on to somethings that struck me as odd:
“He’s lied about everything,” said Bolick. “If you go into a war where there’s no end game, how is it going to end? There’s no clear objective.”
For a MAGA Trump voter this guy sure sounds like MS NOW. I guess a month of war and very few US casualities were enough to turn this America First patriot into a CNN viewer.

Look I am not saying the guy is ficitious or a plant but his name sounds a lot like bollocks.
He added that Trump is doing “relatively poorly” with hyper online young men who are influenced heavily by media figures like Tucker Carlson and other isolationists in the GOP.
This just made me laugh a little.
Relatively poorly with incels. Would that not be a badge of honor to Politico and their core audience? Also what the fuck does relatively poorly mean? Mr. Belcher sure has political speak down at a young age.

Anyway, yes I am sure that Iran is a devisive issue. I am sure there are Trump voters who do not like it just like there are Democrats who do. I am sure if it continues on it will be very bad for Trump and the right in general.
 
Could you let me know what news sources you trust for unbiased reporting? It seems like anything that's critical of/negative about Trump gets dismissed as if it's an opinion piece from the Huffington Post, regardless of source.
The least you could do is not pull from fucking Politico

But what am I saying? This is the same person who voted for Sadiq Khan, ladies and gentlemen
 
Atrás
Top Abajo