- Registrado
- 1 de Abr, 2024
I can't back this up with anything because I heard it by word of mouth. But the source was someone that actually has information on the topic. One of the major vaccine distributors was at the time it was first released on the public essentially conducting a double blind study on the population itself. Where a certain number of vaccines that were handed out were saline (or something inert, not the vaccine itself). Which turns out to not be such a bad thing, but it's still completely unethical either way.Maybe 'the authorities said so' isn't a substitute for actual testing & data. Don't worry, you can dismiss the Oxford study because I posted a Blaze article that linked to it.
I definitely would understand people not just taking my word on this. All I can say is the information came from someone that would have direct knowledge about this. So do with that what you will.