I doubt it, most 2A retards love when the fat child rapist treads on them
I've a different opinion. Most draftees are trained quickly, a percentage don't want to be there, and whilst they bulk up the numbers they hamper soldiers who are good at what they do as they have to carry the slack.
I was going to explain this in the Randbot thread. Randbot claimed he got domed with an ammo box by a female diversity hire, stating that her incompetence was what did it. I call bullshit (my theory is he got domed deliberately by another soldier because no-one liked him and that type of thing happens). Diversity hires in the ADF at the time were spared a lot of physical jobs as they weren't trusted (like unloading ammo boxes). The problem with a lot of the diversity hires in the Australian military was essentially they were often being pushed into positions they didn't want to be in and weren't fit for purpose (often these women were being used by commanders and politicians to make the commander and politician look good, they didn't give a shit as to the well-being or wants of the diversity hire). Our operational efficiency dropped when this happened during exercises, and this can't be blamed on the "muh female thing" as my unit had female non-commissions and officers before this trend took off. The issue was the diveristy hires were unfit and unmotivated, which meant that others had to pick up the slack (carry their gear, do their jobs, fix their mistakes). This type of thing would double or triple the workload, and has a major effect on morale. Women who wanted to be there and met requirements didn't impact operational performance, those who were pushed there due to political agenda did negatively affect it. The key take away from this is that people who aren't the right fit for the job and aren't sufficiently motivated massively hamper the fighting effectiveness of a military unit.
You're right about the cult worship stuff. But that isn't going to matter when they're having to haul their own gear, have to follow orders (these people are emotional toddlers who like to argue), they're below average with cognitive function which leads to mistakes and fuck ups. By drafting, you've flooded the ranks with people who won't be able to sustain motivation, aren't going to be properly trained, aren't going to act in a competent manner, but are going to be a burden on other military personel (leading to further moral issues and drops in combat efficiency).
A draft works in a WW2 scenario where people are motivated to fight, it doesn't work in a Vietnam/Afghanistan/Iran issue where there is no direct threat to the United States, and drafting miggers and people who don't want to be there is only going to make the job harder.
The last thing you should ever want is to go to war having to fight alongside miggers. What you want to do is survive, get paid, and go home. You get really intolerant of anything that is an obstacle to you achieving those three things. War is a hard enough job without having to babysit emotionally fragile fuckups.
