Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

Trump has officially gone insane, can't believe I once liked this guy back in 2015/2016
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • Screenshot_2026-03-08-19-16-23-385_com.twitter.android.jpg
    Screenshot_2026-03-08-19-16-23-385_com.twitter.android.jpg
    626.7 KB · Vistas: 244
lol of course the fat retard believes what Lindsey Graham told him about Iran
He's surrounded by people with their own agendas who know he's senile and unable to tell fact from fiction.

I am sure he 100% believed we would be greeted as liberators and the Iranian people would immediately rise up and take control of the government, then he just watches FOX News and posts on Truth Social where everyone fellates him. If he runs into a news source that's critical of him he calls it fake news because that's just literally what he thinks it is.

This should be completely obvious, but cattle aren't known to be the smartest mammals
 
I hate to beat the literal dead horse that is Charlie Kirk at this point but something I find ridiculously stupid is people claiming that Kirk, near the end of his life, had sincerely become opposed to intervention in the middle east and zionist influence in the American government and was going to lead a revolutionary within the American conservative movement that would have permanently destroyed neoconservatism and was taken out by mossad for that reason.

Being charitable and assuming that he actually did become anti interventionist and anti Zionist and was still alive today, he'd most likely still be sweeping for the Trump admin because of the sheer amount of money he was making for promoting MAGA and the fact that he'd still see Trump as the lesser of two evils. If he would have ended up turning on Trump because of the war with Iran and maybe further revelations for the Epstein files, he would have been excommunicated from MAGA inc in the same way Tucker Carlson, Thomas Massie, and MTG were for daring to criticize king pedo, and miggers would have, of course, would have turned on him as well for refusing to suck orange nigger chode
Generally I'd agree, but he absolutely was doing a 180. Refusing money from jewish donors and actively being against the Iran war he saw coming. And normally I'd agree that he would've flip flopped again. But even Matt Walsh, Trump dick sucker supreme, isn't supporting the Iran war. Or at least he wasn't last time I checked. I think there's a real chance Kirk would've been openly against it.
20251128_094610.jpg 20251128_094612.jpg 20250912_141008.jpg 20250912_141017.jpg 20250912_141013.jpg 20250912_141011.jpg 1757719657052121m.jpg
 
Generally I'd agree, but he absolutely was doing a 180. Refusing money from jewish donors and actively being against the Iran war he saw coming. And normally I'd agree that he would've flip flopped again. But even Matt Walsh, Trump dick sucker supreme, isn't supporting the Iran war. Or at least he wasn't last time I checked. I think there's a real chance Kirk would've been openly against it.
Ver archivo adjunto 8672714Ver archivo adjunto 8672715Ver archivo adjunto 8672716Ver archivo adjunto 8672717Ver archivo adjunto 8672718Ver archivo adjunto 8672719Ver archivo adjunto 8672720
The way Charlie Kirk was speaking there, you can clearly see that he would protest the modern Iran War.

And they keep saying the liberals killed him. For what purpose? If the liberals were that violent, they'd have killed all the major MAGA talking heads and even the Groypers for all their race talk. Charlie Kirk is hardly the worst person in their eyes.
 
Última edición:
The way Charlie Kirk was speaking there, you can clearly see that he would protest the modern Iran War.
The way Trump was speaking in the run-up to the election you can clearly see he would protest the modern Iran War.
Everyone engaged in politics with a large enough following is some sort of ghoul that will flip-flop on *any* position when they feel like they have to. The people that are sticking to a strict ethical/moral compass never get far. Even Null is randomly simping for feds when it benefits him, and you expect Charlie Kirk to not? He would just say it's all about defeating the enemies of Christianity or whatever bullshit.
 
Charlie Kirk is hardly the worst person in their eyes.
No he absolutely was. Liberals despised him. But mostly for his anti gay anti tranny rhetoric, not because he didn't support the coming war.

I think it's much more likely that Mossad killed him for refusing jew bribes than some gay tranny dating lefty sniped him though.
 
And they keep saying the liberals killed him. For what purpose? If the liberals were that violent, they'd have killed all the major MAGA talking heads and even the Groypers for all their race talk. Charlie Kirk is hardly the worst person in their eyes.
Because the evil libruals who are fucking your dog and molesting your children wanted a good christian man dead ok? Stop asking questions and go die for israel
 
No he absolutely was. Liberals despised him. But mostly for his anti gay anti tranny rhetoric, not because he didn't support the coming war.

I think it's much more likely that Mossad killed him for refusing jew bribes than some gay tranny dating lefty sniped him though.
The liberals despise A LOT of people for the anti-gay and anti-tranny rhetoric; if they were as violent as the Right says, there would be a lot of dead right-wing commentators.

Most liberals I knew didn't even know Kirk until he died.

Because the evil libruals who are fucking your dog and molesting your children wanted a good christian man dead ok? Stop asking questions and go die for israel
LOL good luck finding people who will die for that. Gen Z and the millennial generation are sick to death of war.
 
LOL good luck finding people who will die for that. Gen Z and the millennial generation are sick to death of war.
Actually something very interesting: This administration is the first time in the last 8? 12? years we've explicitly been at war abroad. So for those in the (current) 18-30 demographic, the republicans are the party of war. Actually the war with Iran is only majority supported by end-of-life boomers, if I had to guess.
Edit: yeah
war.png
 
Actually something very interesting: This administration is the first time in the last 8? 12? years we've explicitly been at war abroad. So for those in the (current) 18-30 demographic, the republicans are the party of war. Actually the war with Iran is only majority supported by end-of-life boomers, if I had to guess.
Edit: yeah
Ver archivo adjunto 8672975
Much hay was made of the Gen Z shift towards Trump in 2024, but he's managed to lose all that support and more in a third of a term.
 
Generally I'd agree, but he absolutely was doing a 180. Refusing money from jewish donors and actively being against the Iran war he saw coming. And normally I'd agree that he would've flip flopped again. But even Matt Walsh, Trump dick sucker supreme, isn't supporting the Iran war. Or at least he wasn't last time I checked. I think there's a real chance Kirk would've been openly against it.
I mean I definitely don't deny that this is a possibility and I do think it's possible that mossad whacked him for turning on Israel but I doubt his ability to have lead a successful anti Zionist coup against the GOP establishment. He probably just would have pulled a Matt Walsh, still subservient to Trump but also virtue signaling to the America First crowd who have since began to turn on Trump (not just referring to Fuentes or the groypers here, but also people like Tucker and MTG). The whole " Trump is the lesser of two evils" doesn't even make any sense when Trump is literally sweeping for the pedophile elites these fags claim are agents of Satan. Wouldn't Massie be the guy to back then because he is against going to war with Iran on Israel's behalf and for exposing the Epstein class?
 
Most liberals I knew didn't even know Kirk until he died.
I think most people just know him as the change my mind meme guy. The debatebro thing lasted from like 2014-2017 or so, then most everyone just lost interest.

He was also grifting pretty hard based on TPUSA audits. A little AIPAC money would change his mind about Israel real quick. Never believe these fuckers have principles.
 
That said, I thought mutualism was the centrists of com/cap type anarchist spergs.
I haven't kept up.
used to be a Mutualist until I read "Society of the Spectacle" by Guy Debord and realized my understand of Commodification was wrong.
The way Charlie Kirk was speaking there, you can clearly see that he would protest the modern Iran War.

And they keep saying the liberals killed him. For what purpose? If the liberals were that violent, they'd have killed all the major MAGA talking heads and even the Groypers for all their race talk. Charlie Kirk is hardly the worst person in their eyes.
yeah I think the FBI jerked the Kirk, Liberals wouldve gone after someone like Fuentes or something if they were violent. Theres no indication Robinson was an Anti-Zionist nor actual evidence he even did it.
Wouldn't Massie be the guy to back then because he is against going to war with Iran on Israel's behalf and for exposing the Epstein class?
I think they are, the GOP primary will be Massie vs MAGA and it will fold into the election itself if Massie can maintain his seat in May (which I think he will)
 
Atrás
Top Abajo