Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.

[Sensitive Young Man]

Has my credit score gone up yet?

I think Maori Kiwifruit Growers works in that department, ask him.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

So no valid reason to bomb Iran over nukes either in that case. Got it.

Iran signed the NPT and is run by jihadist death cultists who try to export the Islamic revolution.

read the terms of the agreements you sign and plan ahead

 

[Unredacted TND]

So no valid reason to bomb Iran over nukes either in that case. Got it.

Yeah man just let the country who spent the last decade chanting death to America have nukes, how hard it is, you guys are so mean.

 

[last whitey in Toronto]

Kikes made Iran hold the embassy staff hostage. Kikes made Iran do the Beirut bombing. Kikes made Iran torture the Beirut CIA section chief until he went insane. Kikes made Iran give IEDs to Iraqi insurgents. Kikes made Iran give arms to the Houthis so they could strangle global shipping. Do you see how fucking retarded you sound?

Who did 9/11?

You're the retard. I could go in detail into list of 10x more things that Israel has done and we have confirmed (just incase if you are smooth brain and don't believe September 11 wasn't an inside job).

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

This has been the bread and butter of the media during Trump. Trump and those around him will generally always not give specific answers in order to tip their hand or take options off the table with the mindset of "you don't tell your opponent that you're limiting your options"

The Media uses this to fill in that gap where they won't answer, with whatever convenient option to say "look see he won't say they won't do this, that means that's what's happening"

Breaking!
Trump refuses to rule out raping Jess Phillips!!!

 

[Sensitive Young Man]

Iran signed the NPT and is run by jihadist death cultists who try to export the Islamic revolution.

read the terms of the agreements you sign and plan ahead

I agree, but let’s not pretend that Israel isn’t also run by insane death cultists.

Who did 9/11?

You're the retard. I could go in detail into list of 10x more things that Israel has done and we have confirmed (just incase if you are smooth brain and don't believe September 11 wasn't an inside job).

You’re not going to believe this since you’re obviously a jeet, but both countries are bad for America.

 

[Farm Hand]

Well, so our first strike was really pre-emptive.

Going along with what I already said in a highlight post about the irrelevancy of "imminent threat" to justify action against Iran, if Witkoff's wording is exactly as claimed, he could be using weasel words to actually mean that Iran could have been ten days from enrichment if they had the centrifuges and other necessary lab tools to do so. The other part of Witkoff's statement, on the other hand, is much less ambiguous when it comes to Iran's unrelenting nuclear ambition.

 

[bangdingow]

Iran signed the NPT and is run by jihadist death cultists who try to export the Islamic revolution.

read the terms of the agreements you sign and plan ahead

That's strange. Kikes seem to welcome these refugee jihadist men with open arms in Christian countries.

 

[last whitey in Toronto]

You’re not going to believe this since you’re obviously a jeet, but both countries are bad for America.

Did I say Iran was good? Do not put words in my mouth. Like many times I have said on this thread, I don't give a fuck about sandnigger problems and we should just never look at the middle east again.

 

[pooterino]

So no valid reason to bomb Iran over nukes either in that case. Got it.

Nukes? No, not really. For funding Hamas, Hezbolla, Houthis... probably. For funding "revolutions" (aka turrism) around the world, second only to Ghaddafi back in his peak days... also yes.

To test out our jets/awacs/missiles/drones/satellites/intel/etc against a target? Probably just a bonus.

Getting to see Chinese/Russian-magitek get blown the fuck out (in both Venezuela and now Iran)? Priceless kino.

 

[Sensitive Young Man]

Do not put words in my mouth

“Saar, please do not put words in my bloody mouth saar!”

 

[bangdingow]

Nukes? No, not really. For funding Hamas, Hezbolla, Houthis... probably. For funding "revolutions" (aka turrism) around the world, second only to Ghaddafi back in his peak days... also yes.

To test out our jets/awacs/missiles/drones/satellites/intel/etc against a target? Probably just a bonus.

Getting to see Chinese/Russian-magitek get blown the fuck out (in both Venezuela and now Iran)? Priceless kino.

Nukes seems to be prevailing justification though.

 

[Unredacted TND]

I generally like Matt Walsh's domestic takes and deadpan sense of humor, but as far as his rare foreign policy takes go, he's always been an ignorant isolationist nitwit who can't think two steps ahead on how eliminating one of the biggest belligerent actors in the world can be beneficial to the biggest hegemony in the world. He is able to recognize and brag about America making a puppet out of belligerent Venezuela, but Iran is apparently beyond his comprehension.

Some have honestly tried to convince him otherwise, but he still goes on and on.

https://x.com/HAHazony/status/2027905511081791687

Ver archivo adjunto 8645684Ver archivo adjunto 8645689

I hope the last guy convinced him, but his reasoning is too funny. He acts like Vance would sweep with 400 electoral votes and 70% of popular vote if it weren't for Iran

 

[StudMccool]

countries ranked by gdp


you guys think it would be worth going to war for Singapore or Austria?

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

insane death cultists.

nah they just want to infight over the draft issue

That's strange. Kikes seem to welcome these refugee jihadist men with open arms in Christian countries.

don't call the vatician kikes, very rude.

 

[Big Nasty]

Trump Was Always an Iran Hawk
https://archive.is/ysnYT

For more than four decades, Donald Trump has called for invading Iran, seizing its oil, and preventing it from gaining a nuclear weapon. You wouldn’t know this if you listened to some of Trump’s erstwhile supporters. In the wake of his latest attack on Iran, they accuse him of betraying the America First movement. “This isn’t stabbing Trump’s original followers in the back. It’s stabbing them in the front,” says American Conservative editor Curt Mills.

Trump has always taken a less idealistic approach to foreign policy than do neoconservative interventionists or liberal internationalists. He has frequently and opportunistically attacked his opponents as warmongers. But his problem with “forever wars” was not that they involved bloodshed; it was that they didn’t end in victory.

Trump’s Iran-hawk bona fides go back to 1980, when he gave what the historians Charlie Laderman and Brendan Simms describe as his “earliest recorded statement on foreign policy to a national audience.”

In an interview with NBC, Trump complained that the Iran hostage crisis was a sign that America no longer commanded international respect. His interviewer replied, “Obviously you’re advocating that we should have gone in there with troops, et cetera, and brought our boys out like Vietnam.” Trump replied: “I absolutely feel that, yes.”

Trump then worried aloud that the Iran-Iraq war could develop into a larger conflict because the United States “is not more involved in terms of setting policy in that area.” This interview set the pattern for the coming decades.

In a 1987 speech in New Hampshire, Trump suggested, in the words of The New York Times, that the United States should “attack Iran and seize some of its oil fields in retaliation for … Iran’s bullying of America.”

In 1988, Trump told The Guardian, “I’d be harsh on Iran. They’ve been beating us psychologically, making us look a bunch of fools. One bullet shot at one of our men or ships and I’d do a number on Kharg Island,” an Iranian oil hub.

In 2000, Trump complained again about how Jimmy Carter had handled Iran and said that as president he would “believe very strongly in extreme military strength.”

In 2007, Trump said, after being asked what he’d do if he were president, “First, I’d try and solve the problems in the Middle East.”

In 2011, Trump told Bill O’Reilly, “I wouldn’t let them have a nuke”—referring to Iran. He then dismissed Barack Obama as a “weak president that kisses everybody’s ass.”

In 2020, after killing General Qasem Soleimani, Trump warned that any retaliation from Iran would result in his hitting Iranian cultural sites “very fast and very hard.”

In 2024, after intelligence officials told Trump that Iran was attempting to assassinate him, Trump declared, “An attack on a former President is a Death Wish for the attacker!”

Given this record, it isn’t exactly surprising that Trump ordered strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites in 2025, or that he has now launched a more ambitious attack on Iran.

It is true that Trump often presented himself as the anti-war candidate. But just as frequently, he indicated his readiness to use military force. He was more restrained in his first term than he has been in his second, making it easier to see him as a non-interventionist. And he brought into his second administration several people identified with foreign-policy restraint. But his overall record indicated a readiness to vindicate American honor and advance American interests, rather than a rejection of foreign conflicts. Even as Trump claimed to be the “president of peace,” he spoke of achieving “peace through strength.”

It is understandable that non-interventionists are disappointed in Trump. But many have gone further, accusing him of a radical about-face brought about by undue influence from Israel. Both Dean Baker, the establishment liberal economist, and Candace Owens, the anti-establishment right-wing podcaster, have begun referring to “Operation Epstein Fury.” Curt Mills says that Trump has been “conned and bullied by Israeli hawks and Capitol Hill neocons.”

“Trump’s actions should be blamed on—or credited to—himself.”

But there was no need to con or bully Trump into a course of action he was always ready to pursue. Trump’s actions should be blamed on—or credited to—himself and his supporters, rather than any foreign country. Here as elsewhere, talk of Israeli conspiracy has become a way for MAGA influencers to explain away the gap between their claims about Trump during the campaign, and his record since entering office.

Precisely because this war reflects Trump’s priorities, it will be an important test for his vision of foreign policy. There are reasons to doubt the prudence of Trump’s latest move. But as Stephen Wertheim has noted, the fact that Trump does not care about democracy promotion gives him greater freedom of movement than George W. Bush enjoyed. Just as Trump’s actual foreign policy views never constrained him from launching this attack, they may leave him freer to bring it to an end.

 

[Burnt Fish]

Nukes seems to be prevailing justification though.

and the threat posed if they had them is a valid justification, and their signing of the NPT reinforces that validity.

 

[Cron]

So no valid reason to bomb Iran over nukes either in that case. Got it.

can we bomb you next? you need to go!

 

[As Planned]

24 hours ... 3-4 days ... 4-5 weeks ... now forever

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116163464520215003

 

[Ghostse]

What do you think the US and NATO have been doing in Ukraine the past four years? You better hope Russia doesn't decide to perpetually supply Iran the way we have Ukraine. They could very easily.

Supply them with what equipment? Tanks designed while Stalin still ruled the USSR? Or did you forget Russia is importing Shaheeds from Iran to blow up kindergartens?

Then again, you think the strait o Hormuz has literal fucking gate on it that Iran can shut. Lol. No wonder you are a BROOOOOOCS tard

KGB isn't recruiting the best anymore.

In response to the Islamic terrorist attack in Austin, 70 Texas state legislators are calling for a total ban on H-1Bs:
Ver archivo adjunto 8644713Ver archivo adjunto 8644714Ver archivo adjunto 8644715Ver archivo adjunto 8644716Ver archivo adjunto 8644717Ver archivo adjunto 8644718
Source (Archive)

It'll never happen but my god imagine if it DID.

I can't tell if you're being ironic or not

bruh. I know austism makes it hard to pick up sarcasm but I am literally describing Irans actions in the previous 48, you don't need to go back to the 90s lol.

"why yes we are a bunch of disingenuous cocksuckers who didn't care when iran 30k people, some of them even including FUCKING children."

again, i hope he gets assassinated because fuck garbage like him.

That video makes me very interested in liberating Iran. I can see the work of the plastic surgeon and know that without lots of razor work she'd look like the wolf man, but the version being presented there makes me really want to see the Shah's flag more places.

So the embassy in KSA was empty at the time of the attack.... GG Iran you hit an empty building lol

That was likely intentional. They usually use proxies to attack embassies and diplomats, killing anther country's diplomats in another country's embassy is the sort of shit that causes everyone to abandon you.