Iran Crisis & the 2026 War between Iran and the United States, Gulf States, and Israel - Please focus on news and coverage, not argumentation.

It's too bad they are gone. they were built for escorting convoys. :(
Ver archivo adjunto 8645601
Perrys are still around. Just not in US service.

It’s not satire faggot. Khamenei was 100% right about women and people of queerness. I am a big supporter of Islamic feminism and Islamic gender studies.
The problem with being such a committed shitposter, George, is that people eventually get wise to it. :)
 
UAE is pretty much the only arab country whose military isn't a fucking meme
UAE got BTFO out of Yemen by Saudi Arabia in a single airstrike.

Given that Qatar is now against Iran, what are the chances he'll just stay silent?
Low.
He maintains his base more by feigning opposition. And just because Qatar is anti-Iran doesn't mean they're pro-Israel, so expect more "ISRAEL'S WAR!" type shit.

I hope this shit escalates, I wanna die in a war for Israel so bad.
How would this realistically escalate?
 
So now South Korea is joining Spain to reveal their true colors.

TLDR: United States commited a heckin terrorism by killing a foreign leader.

Source: https://www.newsis.com/view/NISX20260301_0003530825
(not done archiving yet)

The Fatherland Innovation Party claimed that the announcement of the death of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a U.S. and Israeli airstrike on the 1st was "clear state terrorism".

Spokesperson Han Ga-seon said in a comment that day, "The leader of a sovereign country was killed by a foreign army in his own country", and "We strongly condemn the US invasion, which directly violates the UN Charter".

He continued, "The moment the logic that a powerful country can eliminate the regimes and leaders of other countries if it wants to do so is accepted, the world will return to a jungle ruled by force, not law", adding, "Attempts to subdue the system through military force while ignoring diplomatic procedures will lead the world into a deeper vicious cycle of chaos and retaliation in the future".

"Peace cannot be achieved through violence", a spokesperson said, emphasizing that "'peace through force' is only rhetoric that justifies violence by the strong".

He added, "The United States must immediately stop military action and return to the principles of compliance with international law and diplomatic solutions", adding, "Order by force is not peace, but only the beginning of another war".
You mean these people? They barely hold a presence in the SK government.
1772513108260.png
 
Conscription is both unnecessary and unpopular, but it is also not necessarily a good thing and there is a serious argument to be made that conscript soldiers perform worse than volunteer soldiers.

US military doctrine following the lessons of Vietnam have emphasized a smaller force of voluntary, trained "professionals" rather than aimless conscript soldiers thrown into the meat grinder.
Even during Vietnam the vast majority of draftees were used to make up gaps in force numbers in "safe" places like Europe and Japan as volunteers got redeployed to Vietnam, and most draftees who were sent to Vietnam were rear-area support troops. Very few draftees wound up fighting on the front lines for the reasons you yourself just mentioned.
We're sam hyde their idubbz
"Ayatollah Khamenei, I AM COMING TO BOOOMB YOOUU!"
"You mean, in the ring?"
"No, in Tehran, at his palace!"
Bruh doesn't know that all branches of the military exceeded recruiting targets last year and are well beyond pace to do so again this year, and that retention rates also exceeded targets last year and are well beyond pace to do so again this year. Bruh is living in that pol fantasy sneedworld
Turns out when you don't shit on your own country constantly and have a proven track record of WINNING its easy to get volunteers. Maybe Europe could try it.
Got a news source saying we are up to 6 dead US service members
https://youtube.com/watch?v=kr-03s2K130
The only thing worse than baseless doomposting is late baseless doomposting.
Without a military what stops India and the other Muslim from stealing all their copper to sell for scrap metal?
1772509255914.png
(Yes, Mesopotamia was located where Iraq is now, but potato potato.)
Is America going to invade? No? Then nothing is going to happen. Morale bombing doesn't work, we learned this in WWII.
Man, if only we were trying to demoralize them instead of wipe out their missile launchers and leadership, then you might have a good point.
With what? The T-34s they're busying modernizing?

Well, yeah, theoretically, but would Iran even want missiles that can't properly fit inside their launch systems?
Japan, unlike Germany, never actually ceased existing as a state.
Yeah, but they finally cucked the Finns into ditching the swastika, so that sucks total balls.
 
Última edición:
still needed to enrich the uranium to 90 percent

what you're talking about is called the nuclear threshold and a lot of countries are capable of it

Ver archivo adjunto 8645699
Idk man the only non nuke states (besides iran) that could build one are canada, germany, Japan, Taiwan, south Korea, and Taiwan, and they all are basically under our protection. (South Africa doesn't count because it actually had nukes). But 6 nations isn't a lot.
 
Did he miss the part where intelligence caught Khamenei in the open with a bunch of other cunts and decided to seize once in a lifetime opportunity to vaporize his ass?
World couldn't stay willingly blind to thousands of protesters already executed and god knows how many more being next on the chopping block (indefinite amounts until unrest is quelled which they would be absolutely willing to kill), and US was poised to do something about it. Which is just one of many good reasons to regime change Iran.

Matt Walsh always has some of the most retarded takes.
I generally like Matt Walsh's domestic takes and deadpan sense of humor, but as far as his rare foreign policy takes go, he's always been an ignorant isolationist nitwit who can't think two steps ahead on how eliminating one of the biggest belligerent actors in the world can be beneficial to the biggest hegemony in the world. He is able to recognize and brag about America making a puppet out of belligerent Venezuela, but Iran is apparently beyond his comprehension.

Some have honestly tried to convince him otherwise, but he still goes on and on.
1772512422689.png 1772512483597.png

Oh, here's a good bit I just found. I remember Matt Walsh making this rant.
1772513390755.png
 
IMG_6461.jpeg
Nothing about this is contradictory, our assets are at risk when they’re just stationed there.

You could argue we were a belligerent by massing forces, but that doesn’t mean we can’t make “preemptive” strikes.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo