US US military preparing for potentially weeks-long Iran operations - The disclosure by the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the planning, raises the stakes for the diplomacy underway between the United States and Iran.

1.png

The U.S. military is preparing for the possibility of sustained, weeks-long operations against Iran if President Donald Trump orders an attack, two U.S. officials told Reuters, in what could become a far more serious conflict than previously seen between the countries.

The disclosure by the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the planning, raises the stakes for the diplomacy underway between the United States and Iran.

U.S. and Iranian diplomats held talks in Oman last week in an effort to revive diplomacy over Tehran's nuclear program, after Trump amassed military forces in the region, raising fears of new military action.

U.S. officials said on Friday the Pentagon was sending an additional aircraft carrier to the Middle East, adding thousands more troops along with fighter aircraft, guided-missile destroyers and other firepower capable of waging attacks and defending against them.

Trump, speaking to U.S. troops on Friday at a base in North Carolina, said it had "been difficult to make a deal" with Iran.

"Sometimes you have to have fear. That's the only thing that really will get the situation taken care of," Trump said.

Asked for comment on the preparations for a potentially sustained U.S. military operation, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said: "President Trump has all options on the table with regard to Iran."

"He listens to a variety of perspectives on any given issue, but makes the final decision based on what is best for our country and national security," Kelly said.

The Pentagon declined to comment.

The United States sent two aircraft carriers to the region last year, when it carried out strikes against Iranian nuclear sites.

However, June's "Midnight Hammer" operation was essentially a one-off U.S. attack, with stealth bombers flying from the United States to strike Iranian nuclear facilities. Iran staged a very limited retaliatory strike on a U.S. base in Qatar.

RISKS INCREASING​

The planning underway this time is more complex, the officials said.

In a sustained campaign, the U.S. military could hit Iranian state and security facilities, not just nuclear infrastructure, one of the officials said. The official declined to provide specific detail.

Experts say the risks to U.S. forces would be far greater in such an operation against Iran, which boasts a formidable arsenal of missiles. Retaliatory Iranian strikes also increase the risk of a regional conflict.

The same official said the United States fully expected Iran to retaliate, leading to back-and-forth strikes and reprisals over a period of time.

The White House and Pentagon did not respond to questions about the risks of retaliation or regional conflict.

Trump has repeatedly threatened to bomb Iran over its nuclear and ballistic missile programs and crushing of internal dissent. On Thursday, he warned the alternative to a diplomatic solution would "be very traumatic, very traumatic."

Iran's Revolutionary Guards have warned that in case of strikes on Iranian territory, they could retaliate against any U.S. military base.

The U.S. maintains bases throughout the Middle East, including in Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Turkey.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met Trump for talks in Washington on Wednesday, saying that if an agreement with Iran were reached, "it must include the elements that are vital to Israel."

Iran has said it is prepared to discuss curbs on its nuclear program in exchange for lifting sanctions, but has ruled out linking the issue to missiles.

Article Link

Archive
 
Última edición:
Bing Bang Wahoo has been visiting the White House an awful lot.
I don't think things are happening as people think they are. If you really do control someone, you don't need to drop by their place all the time to get them to do what you want. The Board of Peace has an entire board for Gaza alone and it's majority Muslim.

The Board of Peace itself is Trump shaking down other countries for a "permanent" position, which is just fucking hilarious because you know we're going to pull out if it suits our needs. Hell, I bet it goes out the window if another party takes over the White House.
 
Of course nobody cares about "muh freedom for Iranians" in the first place, it is just to give the US and Israel full regional Hegemony after Russia has been kicked out of Syria.

Freedom has always been a canard. Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy/Islamic theocracy hybrid and we’ll never say a word so long as they keep the oil flowing and leave Israel alone.
 
Freedom has always been a canard. Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy/Islamic theocracy hybrid and we’ll never say a word so long as they keep the oil flowing and leave Israel alone.
Long tradition actually.

Look at what countries stayed monarchies after WW1, and which ones were allowed to stay monarchies. To this very day.
Bound to the alliance with the yanks.
 
Just leave them alone.

Not a friend of the Mullah bullshit by any means, but US and Russian involvement made the Middle East into the unstable shithole it is today.
Not a good track-record.

Of course nobody cares about "muh freedom for Iranians" in the first place, it is just to give the US and Israel full regional Hegemony after Russia has been kicked out of Syria.
Literally the whole Middle East, sans the commie Palestinians (read their propaganda, it's filled with commie shit), hate Iran because they've become the new Iraq by funding, arming, and supporting terrorist groups. There are so many bodies that Iran is responsible for and a lot of them are Muslims. There are countless terrorist attacks in the Middle East that the media won't talk about because they're Palestinian-aligned. The media gobbles on Palestinian cock. Israel and the Saudis are improving their relationship by a shared hatred of Iran. The only exceptions are ISIS-affiliated groups, but literally everyone (including Iran) hates them and no one will cry over them except lazy Westerners who get assmad when the US does anything.

I get the disgust for another potential Middle East boondoggle, and the concept of another regime change war in that region is unpalatable, but I think this military action has the potential of being productive since the US has more regional support for this action. Imagine if the US went to Iraq with Saudi support (which it did not, Saudi Arabia strongly opposed it). It won't be as much of a shitshow as last time, maybe.
 
Don't get me wrong I think the US should basically stay the fuck out of the middle east, but this whole thing seems fucky from a media coverage standpoint. Like the Iranian government guns down 30,000 protesters and the US media is like, no biggie, now get enraged over these two faggots that got shot in Minnesota over some bulbhead scammers.
 
Literally the whole Middle East, sans the commie Palestinians (read their propaganda, it's filled with commie shit), hate Iran because they've become the new Iraq by funding, arming, and supporting terrorist groups. There are so many bodies that Iran is responsible for and a lot of them are Muslims. There are countless terrorist attacks in the Middle East that the media won't talk about because they're Palestinian-aligned. The media gobbles on Palestinian cock. Israel and the Saudis are improving their relationship by a shared hatred of Iran. The only exceptions are ISIS-affiliated groups, but literally everyone (including Iran) hates them and no one will cry over them except lazy Westerners who get assmad when the US does anything.

I get the disgust for another potential Middle East boondoggle, and the concept of another regime change war in that region is unpalatable, but I think this military action has the potential of being productive since the US has more regional support for this action. Imagine if the US went to Iraq with Saudi support (which it did not, Saudi Arabia strongly opposed it). It won't be as much of a shitshow as last time, maybe.
As a person of sand myself, I'll tell you this: I may hate the Ayatollah, but I hate (((them))) even more. Unless you're talking about governments and not the populace, the general opinion of Iran v. Israel is at worst apathy or indifference, and at best tacit support. But the U.S intervening? That's a sure fire way of making even the most nostalgic-for-Saddam Shia-hating Salafist a full throated supporter of Iran.
 
Última edición:
The people kvetching about "potentially weeks long operations" have already forgotten that we spent 20 years in the middle east to literally zero gain.

I know, as I wasted 2 years of my life in Iraq and Afghanistan wasting taxpayer dollars to "liberate" backwards savages who want nothing more than slavery for non muslims and child brides.
 
The people kvetching about "potentially weeks long operations" have already forgotten that we spent 20 years in the middle east to literally zero gain.

I know, as I wasted 2 years of my life in Iraq and Afghanistan wasting taxpayer dollars to "liberate" backwards savages who want nothing more than slavery for non muslims and child brides.
At best, Trump would take out the current ruling body.
There is no fucking way we're going to stay there after Afghanistan, especially when he's the one who made plans to pull out in the first place.
 
At best, Trump would take out the current ruling body.
And then what? The problem we ran into in the middle east is that the muslim people will not accept civilized rulers. They want their theocracy and child brides. They are not capable of basic decency nor will they ever become peaceful.

They worship a literal demon who tells them to murder all non muslims and he will reward them with sex slaves in the afterlife.

Only when we understand the people we're trying to "save" will we realize that they don't actually want to be saved. They want the rule of the demon they worship named allah. There is literally nothing you can do to protect them or make their lives better for they will attack you for even attempting to do so.

Best to let them slaughter themselves while enriching yourself off of their leaders own corruptions. Certainly there is no goodness among a single muslim just as there were no good residents of Sodom and Gamorah. Let god bring them to ruin until they fully abandon false worship.
 
As a person of sand myself, I'll tell you this: I may hate the Ayatollah, but I hate (((them))) even more. Unless you're talking about governments and not the populace, the general opinion of Iran v. Israel is at worst apathy or indifference, and at best tacit support. But the U.S intervening? That's a sure fire way of making even the most nostalgic-for-Saddam Shia-hating Salafist a full throated supporter of Iran.
I respectfully disagree. Both Saudi Arabia and Egypt have taken steps to crack down on Salafists in the 2020's. You are not wrong here and I don't discount your opinion - you obviously have a better pulse on the Middle East as a sand person than I do as an American - but I question whether US intervention in Iran would spark such a response right now. Even if it did, I imagine the Egyptian and Saudi governments would try to put a stop to that. I also wonder if the US intervening with Iran is part of the peace process: Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Yemen, Jordan, and Israel (their governments, at least) all dislike Iran. There are rumors that Iran is trying to assassinate Ahmed al-Sharaa, which possibly puts Syria at odds with Iran for the time being.

To me, it looks like Iran has made too many enemies and the US wants to strike while the iron is hot.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo