US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I swear I’m gonna build a giant banana to slam into that gigantic monkey man’s statue ass. I hate India so much.
There's currently a new poop born disease that supposedly has like a 70% mortality rate spreading through India right now.

I think it's pretty obvious God hates jeets because there's a new plague there every week.
 
The thing that always bothers me in terms of these political anecdotes is that the left wing narrative becomes fact while the right wing narrative is seen as propaganda. When someone makes the majority of their reporting on how leftists/anti-I.C.E. agitators are being violent, they'll get accused of cherry picking. When it's a leftist, a lot of the time it's the mainstream narrative. So it leads to these scenarios where I'll see a leftist post a clip, take it out of any context and use the strongest language possible (e.g. there was this one tweet that went around two weeks ago that claimed I.C.E. threw a guy to the ground, only found out after he was legal and then dumped him bloodied somewhere else later) and the entire time I am desperate for any sort of context because I know for a fact that isn't the whole story. It tends to drive you crazy, when you start trying to find context for everything, but in a situation like this the mainstream perception is black-and-white, you need some kind of context and outside of dissident right-wing accounts you'll not get it.
 
BREAKING: DOOMSDAY CLOCK NOW SET TO 85 SECONDS TO MIDNIGHT. CLOSEST EVER.
Ver archivo adjunto 8482416
(Xeet)
Please be scared, the Expert™️ fearmongers just raised the scary level!
Dont let them scare you, it either isent going to happen or it wont be our problem anymore
It's fascinating that without the central information gateways of the old monoculture the response to potential world war (real or not) is "lol you won't do shit faggots." Oddly invigorating in a way.
Lmao, and calling it brigading. Like you can't just post anywhere on the site and call someone a retard with retarded beliefs.
These are the same brand of insular semi-sentient forum clique tumor people that pull mini color revolutions in every other forum that houses their sort. Something Awful, NeoGAF, Knockout, RPGnet, the list goes on. They literally cannot maintain cohesion anywhere that people are openly allowed to backtalk them. Are you in the least bit surprised they're spilling their spaghett right now?
 
The thing that always bothers me in terms of these political anecdotes is that the left wing narrative becomes fact while the right wing narrative is seen as propaganda. When someone makes the majority of their reporting on how leftists/anti-I.C.E. agitators are being violent, they'll get accused of cherry picking. When it's a leftist, a lot of the time it's the mainstream narrative. So it leads to these scenarios where I'll see a leftist post a clip, take it out of any context and use the strongest language possible (e.g. there was this one tweet that went around two weeks ago that claimed I.C.E. threw a guy to the ground, only found out after he was legal and then dumped him bloodied somewhere else later) and the entire time I am desperate for any sort of context because I know for a fact that isn't the whole story. It tends to drive you crazy, when you start trying to find context for everything, but in a situation like this the mainstream perception is black-and-white, you need some kind of context and outside of dissident right-wing accounts you'll not get it.
I posted something about this in the riots thread. Basically... its harder for them to control the narrative than before, cause yeah they can influence, and propagandize but people can actually go find full context pretty easy but also, they get desensitized to all these things.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 8485678
I'd explain to this fat burger suit wearing faggot that my family fought in the Civil War and the Indian War and killed Indians to move West and conquer that territory, but he wouldn't argue in good faith and instead would immediately just cut & paste the same fucking line over and over like a Bulbhead with a head wound.
I blame the retarded notion that natives had anything to do with the creation of the country and are a part of their culture.
No, indians are not Americans, Mexicans, or Brazilians, the state was directly born out of colonial administration, the mother country's laws and customs and religion, the customs of Europe at the time, natives weren't even a homogeneous group, it was just a collection of tribes who got conquered and amalgamated into a single ethnic group because it was more convenient.

There's no recognizable native American custom or religious text's influence in the constitution and the laws of the USA or any other country founded by settlers, just like there is no trace of Slavs, celts or Germanic tribes in the area we know as Hungary since the migration, conquest and founding of that region, or anything other than a small % of DNA and a substrate of the Greek language to indicate the previous occupants of that region before indo Europeans took over 6-7 thousand years ago.

I understand we needed to appropriate some sort of icon to culturally cleave ourselves out of the UK, Spanish, Portuguese yoke, but this has backfired spectacularly because it created a false sense of belonging and a a amorphous non racial component to those countries.

With the notion that somehow natives are the forerunners to America, you will always be considered meddlers, outsiders, not real enough Americans, I'd argue even using native names for places, like Idaho, Utah, Detroit, etc was a mistake.

It's like the slavery aspect, a short term economic clutch that has had catastrophic consequences in demographics, culture and society.
 
There’s nothing quite like seeing someone that you followed for retarded cat videos start sperging about ICE on main. Put the shorts in the bag you neurotic bitch.
 
A nation is a group of people. No one who established America was an immigrant, as America was not the nation of any indigenous people.
The indigenous have their own tribal sovereigns. And they failed to establish modern nation-states.

That doesn't make us immigrants. An Anglo Saxon cannot be an immigrant to an Anglo Saxon nation without leaving somewhere first.
A nation are a people, an extension of the family, and they have been since ancient Rome. It's only in the postwar era people confuse nation, state and country.
But I assure you they are 3 entirely separate things.

We stole the countryside, if anything. If Indians wanna say "muh land", sure that's accurate to some of them, but "muh nation"? Absolutely fucking not.
This is a White Anglo Saxon nation that freed a population of chattel of slaves. And indigenous people had very little to do with that nation building a republic, which is a state, or in our case, technically a union of states.

Fuck you, we stole nothing. It is not our fault they picked a fight they couldn't win. It's not our fault they didn't understand the basics of land ownership even as it was explained to them while making the deal. "We are trading you these gems for this land here." Okay. Hey wait, why are you kicking us off this land? "BECAUSE WE JUST FUCKING BOUGHT IT FROM YOU BISON FUCKER.".
 
There's no recognizable native American custom or religious text's influence in the constitution and the laws of the USA or any other country founded by settlers, just like there is no trace of Slavs, celts or Germanic tribes in the area we know as Hungary since the migration, conquest and founding of that region, or anything other than a small % of DNA and a substrate of the Greek language to indicate the previous occupants of that region before indo Europeans took over 6-7 thousand years ago.
Obviously you’ve never seen Ernest Goes to Camp
 
Fuck you, we stole nothing. It is not our fault they picked a fight they couldn't win. It's not our fault they didn't understand the basics of land ownership even as it was explained to them while making the deal. "We are trading you these gems for this land here." Okay. Hey wait, why are you kicking us off this land? "BECAUSE WE JUST FUCKING BOUGHT IT FROM YOU BISON FUCKER.".
Weren't the natives they bought the land from nomads who also thought they were ripping off the settlers because they didn't actually own the land and just happened to be there when the settlers arrived?
 
Why pajeets? They literally worship demon gods.
They're all aspects of one God named Brahman. There's a famous story in the Upanishads stating this:



Then Vidagdha Sâkalya asked him 2: 'How many gods are there, O Yâgñavalkya?' He replied with this very Nivid 3: 'As many as are mentioned in the Nivid of the hymn of praise addressed to the Visvedevas, viz. three and three hundred, three and three thousand 4.'

'Yes,' he said, and asked again: 'How many gods are there really, O Yâgñavalkya?'

'Thirty-three,' he said.


'Yes,' he said, and asked again: 'How many gods are there really, O Yâgñavalkya?'

'Six,' he said.

'Yes,' he said, and asked again: 'How many gods are there really, O Yâgñavalkya?'

'Three,' he said.

'Yes,' he said, and asked again: 'How many gods are there really, O Yâgñavalkya?'

'Two,' he said.

'Yes,' he said, and asked again: 'How many gods are there really, O Yâgñavalkya?'

'One and a half (adhyardha),' he said.

'Yes,' he said, and asked again: 'How many gods are there really, O Yâgñavalkya?'

'One,' he said.

Fits the criteria. There is a lot of nuance about how Brahman = existence in some hindu traditions and if worshipping the concept of existence counts but the simple answer is that I don't have to kill Mr. Patel who sits at the next cube over.

Broke: ICE is Jewish
Woke: Pretti is Jewish
Galaxy brain:

1769614182727.png
There's no recognizable native American custom or religious text's influence in the constitution and the laws of the USA or any other country founded by settlers,
Ben Franklin could be argued to be influenced by an Iroquois diplomat since he printed and distributed the English-Iroquios negotiations during the Treaty of Lancaster in 1744, during which the Onondaga diplomat Canasatego famously recommended that the colonies unite as body:

We have one Thing further to say, and that is, We heartily recommend Union and a good Agreement between our Brethren. Never disagree, but preserve a strict Friendship for one another, and thereby you, as well as we, will become stronger.

Our wise Forefathers established Union and Amity between the Five Nations; this has made us formidable; this has given us great Weight and Authority with our neighbouring Nations.

We are a powerful Confederacy; and, by your observing the same Methods our wise Forefathers have taken, you will acquire fresh Strength and Power; therefore whatever befalls you, never fall out one with another.

There's no direct influence but there may be some.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo