You are being dishonest.
1. There was an attempt at apprehension
2. He actively resisted
3. One officer spotted the gun and yelled about its presence.
4. There was a struggle to hold him down (he was still actively resisting)
5. A retard took the firearm away and there was a "possible" ND (Sigger bros are done!)
6. Because the retard that disarmed him NEVER told anyone, the other officers who were working on the assumption he was STILL armed heard said gun shot and believed he was trying to shoot them(Also did not help he grabbed a magazine during this)
7. Glowie(s) fired on him till he stopped moving.
Finally, when he was downed they started the search for his firearm, and ONLY then that the other mouth-breathing retard tell em, he had the gun the entire time.
Obviously we need to take into account that the timeline was very short, but I think it is fair to say
1. He was unarmed at the time of the shooting
2. The glowie did not necessarily know that
3. He should NOT have actively been resisting WHEN HE KNEW HE WAS ARMED
4. This shooting was a major fuckup, and very likely not justified.
This is my take on the shooting, it is true and just!