You know protests usually have multiple opposing groups, right? So as long as one group wants to "start shit" you'll stay away. It's fine if your policy is to only show up places you know are absolutely safe and there will be no conflict. It becomes insufferable when you start lecturing other people on your lifestyle. For a lot of these people, the "violent protests "are showing up at their home or place of work without invitation.
one group is the fucking federal government in this case you retard. there's nothing to protest. they're arresting fucking illegals, and you know that. you know that these protests are by people who simply do not want the rule of law enforced in this country, and you know that saying this out loud or openly would get you mocked like the retard you are.
apparently they're talking about rittenhouse, so i have nothing to say on that, because i'm not going back in the thread rn to read the entire chain. suffice to say, if you bring a gun, know that they didn't stop making them when you got yours, and it might not end well for you at any protest.
The first shot happens about 1/4 of a second after gray jacket fed takes the gun, there is no way the firing officer could have known that from his viewpoint and has no way to know that that was the only weapon on the retard
nor do the videos even show that this was the firearm in question. it shows something that appears to be a firearm, but if you actually look, the coloration doesn't seem to match the p320, it is probably an ICE glock 19 that he's pulling out since this guy is literally involved in a fistfight with ICE, and if he grabs one of their guns it becomes a lethal force situation. this is not even slightly outside of SOP for an arrest of an extremely hostile suspect, and in fact might have saved an officer's life. i have seen many videos of people grabbing for cop guns, and several where the cop is killed before any of his other officers can draw to stop the gunshots. in a situation that has already progressed to physical violence against police, firearms are plenty appropriate, especially since we know that this faggot HAD a gun.
"should bring", no, "can bring", yes. Also wasn't waving it around.
to anyone who doesn't know, simply having a firearm on your person is considered reasonable suspicion of intent to use deadly force, and is also enough to get you removed from federal housing. having a firearm on your person is not acceptable when you are making the trip to a protest to punch a cop in the face and you know it. where, exactly, did i say HAVING a firearm is bad? just like putting it in the mouth of a child and pulling the trigger, bringing it to a fake protest where your goal is to disrupt law enforcement operations and physically visit violence on them is illegal and adds extra charges to what you did. dumbfuck.
Buddy, the US politics thread is too busy deepthroating anyone that is currently doing "based thing" with no ability to look 3 years ahead, probably because most people like you have nothing to look forward to other than a bridge or the other end of a noose. That doesn't make us the same.
you're a nigger, and you got chased out of the thread for acting like a faggot. you can lie to everyone about it, but i was there, and i was one of the people who chased you out for acting like a faggot. kill yourself.
You can crush immigration by closing the border and not accepting more immigrants,
as you can see, they just lie outright. they just pretend that things that break their argument up aren't happening, and they pretend that things that actual right-wing people want, such as the ability to walk down the street normally with a firearm are the same as taking a loaded gun to a 'protest' where your goal is to free illegal aliens from ICE custody and get into fights with ICE.
for anyone who doesn't know, border crossings are at an all-time low.
they will just lie to you. they have no morals, they have no concern for the truth, and they have no regard for logic or rational thinking. they will simply move to the next argument the second you defeat their current one. watch as this individual shifts the goalposts from "they aren't catching them at the border or stopping immigration" to "well they might be catching them all but that doesn't actually give them the right to start roving through the streets killing people" or "they haven't gotten it to 0% so it's not done yet."
the demoralization agents are quite common here, and they want you to think that the police shooting someone in their own defense when he tries to fistfight them and then is being detained and his own gun goes off is not acceptable. they want you to live in anarcho-tyranny, which is why they flock to any time the police are ever enforcing the law, and spend their entire life convincing you that it's actually wrong for the police to have the ability to stop a shooting before it happens, and at least one person should have to die before police can draw a firearm.
shooting an illegal-lover in self-defense, in the pursuit of protecting your fellow officers after a gunshot has already gone off, on someone who has a gun on their person, is not wrong, and anyone who tries to convince you it is wants you dead, and your children trafficked by illegals. they can claim all they want that they don't want that, but you should judge a man by his actions, not by his words.