US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
They end up as "white" because the only racial categories in federal databases are

1. White
2. Black
3. Asian
4. Native American

The 4th only applies to people affiliated with recognized tribes, so the many millions of brown-skinned, black-haired people south of our border aren't Native American. They aren't Asian or Black, either. That makes them White.
Really? That's a little fucked up. I have seen some pics of criminals labeled as Hispanic. Not very diverse imo :( America is so bigoted.
 
The President has no pardon power over state crimes, which is what murdering a private citizen is.
Not if he uses the power I am about to demonstrate. "The judiciary are gay faggots and can't enforce shit and if they try Delta Force will kill them". It's that simple.
 
This new ICE debate just really fucking pisses me off and puts me in doomer mode because both sides are wrong to varying levels, when even moderate liberals unironically think all illegals should stay here, we should have open borders, and how they keeping omitting the word "illegal" every fucking time they talk about it, as if ICE is also purposefully going after the legal immigrants on a mass scale, while MAGA, even if their core motive for the deportations IS reasonable, comes off as total authority-loving bootlickers for openly celebrating how brazen ICE has been allowed to become with how many times they have disrupted civilian life with the nationwide raids, because that amount of state-sanctioned aggression naturally gets even law-abiding people uncomfortable, especially in a culture that has always celebrated some aspects of libertarianism.

There seems to be no middle ground in mainstream discourse surrounding immigration anymore, you either go full libtard, or full authoritarian.
The middle ground is they go home. Interfering with this in any way should be punished by any means necessary.
 
If Faggy Massie is saying there was $5 billion for rapefugees, why did no other republican vote against it? Why was Chip Roy, currently running for AG in TX or Byron Donalds or Luna not saying anything about it?

That's how you know he's a lying faggot. And he probably hates that the money, if true, was going to white people instead of his precious MIT brownies.
 
Trump should pull a Trudeau and freeze all their bank accounts. Would be funny. They supported it when it happened to Canadians.
 
If Faggy Massie is saying there was $5 billion for rapefugees, why did no other republican vote against it? Why was Chip Roy, currently running for AG in TX or Byron Donalds or Luna not saying anything about it?

That's how you know he's a lying faggot. And he probably hates that the money, if true, was going to white people instead of his precious MIT brownies.
it wasnt even Massie who said anything about it first, it was Rand Paul and Mike Lee... Also Byrone, Chip and Luna are Ziocucks LMAO, they dont and wont offend the power center, simple. The omnibus also contained a good amount of extra millions for border security for Egypt, Oman, etc.
 
Unfortuntatly, William Kelly, dawokefarmer, has received over $20,000 in his gofundme this week
Doesn't GoFundMe prohibit fundraising for criminal defense cases?

Double jeopardy is unconstitutional, and not guilty verdicts don't get appealed.
Interestingly (and I didn't know this either until a recent video by the "Don't Talk to the Police" law professor James Duane mentioned it), jury verdicts can be rejected by the presiding judge under certain circumstances. It came up while Prof. Duane was talking about jury nullification, in fact. Judges cannot overturn acquittals (because of double jeopardy protections, allowing for one exception when jeopardy never attaches in the first place because a trial is found to be a total "sham" -- like bribery of the judge or other officials being discovered), but they can reject guilty verdicts.

Any good writeups on this?
Good ones? No. Whites tend to be better at hiding this shit than most others. Biased leftist screeching from the likes of NPR, PBS, ProPublica and BBC about it though? Certainly.

Yes, there is reliable information from journalistic investigations, federal indictments, and media reports about extrajudicial killings following Hurricane Katrina in 2005, particularly involving perceived looters in areas like Algiers Point (an outskirts neighborhood across the Mississippi River from central New Orleans). These incidents often involved white vigilante groups and police officers targeting African Americans, amid widespread chaos, looting rumors, and a breakdown in law enforcement. While initial media coverage exaggerated citywide violence and portrayed "looters" as rampant threats, subsequent probes revealed targeted shootings that went unpunished for years, with some classified as self-defense or covered up.

One prominent case involved vigilantes in Algiers Point who armed themselves to "stop looters" but ended up shooting unarmed black men. For instance, Roland J. Bourgeois Jr., a white resident, was federally indicted in 2010 for civil rights violations after shooting three black evacuees trying to cross the area; he allegedly warned neighbors that "anything coming up this street darker than a brown paper bag is getting shot." Bourgeois pleaded guilty to hate crimes in 2018 and was sentenced to 10 years, but he died shortly after. Investigative reporting by The Nation and NPR uncovered that this group blockaded streets and used violence against African Americans with no evidence of criminal activity, describing it as a "hidden race war" where black individuals were targeted under the guise of anti-looting patrols.

Police were also implicated in extrajudicial actions. A ProPublica, PBS Frontline, and Times-Picayune investigation documented orders allowing officers to shoot suspected looters. In one case, Henry Glover, a black man scavenging near a strip mall (perceived as looting), was shot in the back by officer David Warren. Witnesses reported Glover was unarmed; police then beat helpers, handcuffed him as he bled out, and later incinerated his body in a car to destroy evidence. Officers involved pleaded not guilty, but the incident highlighted a pattern where 11 civilians were shot by New Orleans police in Katrina's aftermath, with some cases leading to charges.

Another major incident was the Danziger Bridge shooting in eastern New Orleans (an outlying area), where police fired on unarmed civilians crossing the bridge six days after the storm, killing two (including a mentally disabled man) and wounding four others. The victims were not looting but seeking help; officers claimed they were fired upon first, but this was later debunked as a cover-up. Six officers were charged in 2010, with some convictions overturned on technicalities, but the case underscored extrajudicial violence amid anti-looting directives.

These events were fueled by a moral panic, with officials like Mayor Ray Nagin and Police Superintendent Edwin Compass amplifying unverified rumors of rampant looting and violence, shifting resources from rescue to property protection. While not all "looters" were killed extrajudicially—many were simply desperate survivors taking essentials—substantiated cases show racial bias and impunity in the outskirts, with investigations revealing far more vigilante and police aggression than the initial "looter terror" narrative suggested.

The reality is rather different of course, but for verifiable accounts of it, you'd need to talk to the locals (who, in turn, need to know you to be trustworthy).
 
It's an open secret in hospital "finance" that the amount they bill insurance companies is hyper-inflated (often an order of magnitude -- i.e. 1,000%) and if you walk into a billing administrator's office at a hospital that just billed you $80k for an ER visit, tell them "I have no insurance, but I'll pay you $8k cash right now to settle this bill," they'll take it in a heartbeat and gladly write off the rest.

The insurance companies do the same fucking thing -- that hyper-inflated bill for $80k will get laughed off UnitedHealthcare's accounts payable desk and they'll cut the hospital a check for something closer to $10k (i.e. negotiated rates for everything) -- just with more steps.

The hospital admin would rather have "some money" for services rendered than "no money" for services rendered. Never just ignore a hospital bill, no matter how ridiculous it is. Even if you go in and negotiate in bad faith (i.e. "I can afford to pay you X per month for Y months to settle this debt", just to get them to commit to reducing the amount owed), at least argue with them for a reduced total amount so when it goes to collections it doesn't hurt as much. Never let the full inflated bill go to collections -- you'll never get it reduced then and you're destined for bankruptcy.

I fucking hate it. And it's one of the reasons there's pressure now to force hospitals and clinics to publicly post real-world cash-on-the-barrel-head prices for their services and products.
I don't know if anyone has said it already and I'm not reading every post to check but if you are ever going to the ER and don't want to be ripped off. Do not give them your insurance, only sign consent for care, do not sign anything related to billing or payment. They will be much more willing to work with you on the bill in this situation since as moocow's post said, they prefer to get something over nothing. Obviously this is a shitty way to act but you only have to pay this much since they're trying to make up for all of the people not paying anything. We shouldn't have to bear the burden of picking up that cost.
 
They end up as "white" because the only racial categories in federal databases are

1. White
2. Black
3. Asian
4. Native American

The 4th only applies to people affiliated with recognized tribes, so the many millions of brown-skinned, black-haired people south of our border aren't Native American. They aren't Asian or Black, either. That makes them White.
You left out "Non-Hispanic", bud.
 
This new ICE debate just really fucking pisses me off and puts me in doomer mode because both sides are wrong to varying levels, when even moderate liberals unironically think all illegals should stay here, we should have open borders, and how they keeping omitting the word "illegal" every fucking time they talk about it, as if ICE is also purposefully going after the legal immigrants on a mass scale, while MAGA, even if their core motive for the deportations IS reasonable, comes off as total authority-loving bootlickers for openly celebrating how brazen ICE has been allowed to become with how many times they have disrupted civilian life with the nationwide raids, because that amount of state-sanctioned aggression naturally gets even law-abiding people uncomfortable, especially in a culture that has always celebrated some aspects of libertarianism.

There seems to be no middle ground in mainstream discourse surrounding immigration anymore, you either go full libtard, or full authoritarian.
Why the fuck do all your arguments always just boil down to just let the left win? Let the parasites stay is what you're saying. Fuck you and kill yourself.
 
If Faggy Massie is saying there was $5 billion for rapefugees, why did no other republican vote against it? Why was Chip Roy, currently running for AG in TX or Byron Donalds or Luna not saying anything about it?

That's how you know he's a lying faggot. And he probably hates that the money, if true, was going to white people instead of his precious MIT brownies.
He steps outside of his libertarian leanings too much anyways. It's easy to forget that all lolberts don't hate all the government all the time. When the government is doing something that is undoubtedly its constitutional duty (mass deportation and remigration), no expense should be spared and no stone left unturned. He's just being a contrarian faggot at this point. I don't even know why. I thought Trump was popular in Kentucky, or maybe they're the left wing lolberts that don't believe in borders and/or shampoo.
 
Id like to formally admit I was wrong

The dyke hit a fed with her car and I was, AT BEST, splitting hairs at worse just downright wrong.

I know alot of you think I "dident see the right angle" or "was ignoring shit to be obtuse" it was none of that, I truly thought she was "scared" or whatever idk or care. Point is ive POURED over every bit of the evidence and just want to issue an

I was wrong

feel bad for alot of these feds for the most part, must be hell tryna help your nation just to be yelled at all day by the worst of em.

Anyway, Did I miss anything yuge today?
I personally forgive you if you are being true and honest.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo