Somalian daycare fraud - Or, why Minnesota needs to be put under military rule

You are correct. No amount of gotchas will clear things up.
The edited video will be parroted and used as a weapon by the left.
You just don't talk to them. you don't engage with them.
Every word they can get out of you will be twisted into a weapon.
Take some time out of your day to learn a little about leftist strategies, why don't you?

Did you know that propaganda comes in more than one form. In particular, there are at least two broad types of propaganda, what the Soviet dictator Lenin termed "agitation" and "propaganda." They're not quite the same thing. Agitation is supposed to influence your emotions; propaganda is meant to make you misunderstand. In this important episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay discusses the concept of agitprop to open your eyes to it. Join him to learn how to spot influence campaigns you might encounter online or in the news.


Woke Marxists overwhelmingly take advantage of malicious language games. That means you cannot be linguistically lazy when trying to deal with their incursions. We have to start cultivating a habit of linguistic discipline to take apart Woke word magic. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay explains the need for linguistic discipline with several important examples. Join him to start training.


Over the last few years, much has been said about the "motte and bailey" rhetorical strategy, which is a dishonest way in which postmodernist, Woke, and other manipulative people argue. First described by Nicholas Shackel in a 2005 paper, "On the Vacuity of Postmodern Methodology," it has become a standard explanation for the Woke era in the last few years. In Counter Wokecraft (https://www.amazon.com/Counter-Wokecr..., James Lindsay and Charles Pincourt outline both offensive and defensive uses of this crooked strategy, which is a kind of "strategic equivocation" used to steal power. In this episode of New Discourses Bullets, host James Lindsay explains how the "motte and bailey" strategy can be iterated through a series of players to give legitimacy to truly radical ideas and programs while the actors involved keep their own hands mostly clean. Join him to understand an important dynamic.

 
What kind of abject retard watches All Gas No Breaks and goes "Yeah, these guys are stand-up fellas. They clearly don't edit this using Daily Show/John Oliver/Borat/Jay-Walking/Nathan For You tactics to present a false narrative under the flag of comedy journalism."?

I hope you aren't one of those abject retards, dear kiwireader.
 
Channel 5 responded to Nick Shirley's video

Archive



TLDW:
- Those cuts were made for brevity's sake
- Said cuts made Shirley look better because he talks like a retard
- Nick was fine with the video until he got backlash
- Andrew says he's correct about Denver prospering so he trimmed out the brief self doubt
- Andrew hates Trump/Republicans but dislikes the Democrat party too
-- He made it clear with Nick in the first place
 
Última edición:
i love how people reveal themselves calling out how retarded Nick sounds, like as if he wouldn't be mocked if he had the "you betcha" accent instead of the autism accent. the fact people think people from MN should sound normal proves how new they are.
Not surprised. Channel 5 has always had a very clear agenda and angle of presenting information.
They're no better than mainstream.
are people really not understanding this? Like it was always some Tim&Eric/Daily Show style 'let's laugh at retards' style video, of course he edits and makes them seem worse, and yes the best way to do that is to act like their friend and make them open up and force them to say shit to agree with your stated stances that you conveniently edit out. its like being shocked a rapper might be a criminal. What did you think was going on here?
Im on the fence about it, there has to be some Hebrew blood in him. I watched his videos since all gas no brakes inception and I remember him taking all the weirdos, racists, etc in stride. Like you could tell he didnt take personal offense to the crazies he was interviewing. Until the flat earth video, he interviewed a flat earther who implied the jews were behind globe theory or some shit. He immediately tensed up and you could tell he was holding his tongue.
there's no way in hell Andrew never managed to go 'i'm a jew' at any point in any of the thousands of interviews he's done. look how easily they reveal themselves here. not many heebs where he grew up either, he's just a classic Irish american.
 
Callaghan is a faggot. All Gas, No Breaks fell apart because the buyer realized that Callaghan was a retard who’d open him up to lawsuits when he saw unedited footage. Callaghan’s speciality is looking for retards at events or protests. The porn one is something a comedian did before him and he targeted two people from that video.

Also, he almost got cancelled for trying to cry into girls pants.
The best video on Channel 5 is also coincidentally the video that he had no part in making.
 
Nick Shirley works best when he asks dumb questions to random protesters. The vacuousness of the protesters makes nick look erudite in comparison. Same when compared to angry bulbhead somalis.
He needs a vocal coach to help him speak clearer.
 
This actually makes me angry because how stupid Nick is. He has taken the obvious red herring of calling out Andrew for deceptive editing. There is no world where Nick comes out on top here. He's giving the pro-Somali loons exactly the ammunition that they crave, hard proof that Nick Shirley blows things out of proportion, while simultaneously discrediting any future argument against Andrew as being "reactionary" and "based on misinformation".
You are correct. No amount of gotchas will clear things up.
The edited video will be parroted and used as a weapon by the left.
You just don't talk to them. you don't engage with them.
Every word they can get out of you will be twisted into a weapon.

listen, I get your sentiment here. but you really have to stop thinking of this culture war shit in terms of scoring points. because here's the thing: no matter what evidence you have, no matter how many data points you have to contradict them, no matter how strong your arguments are, the opposing team will simply decide that they are right and that they have won. there is no competition. nobody is meeting you on the field. even if this guy came out looking spotless and every single claim he's made about the Somali fraud was vindicated, libs would still just call him an evil racist based on fucking nothing. just look at the Renee Good thing. or the Kyle Rittenhouse thing. or the George Floyd thing. or the January 6 thing. or literally any culture war flashpoint in the past 10-15 years. at some point during the Obama administration, libs just collectively decided that conservatives are fundamentally evil and can never be trusted, respected, or listened to. they do not care about your rhetorical flailings, they know that they're right and you're wrong, and nothing you can possibly say will ever stop them from believing that. if they have nothing to base that belief on, they will simply invent it. if all available evidence flies in the face of that belief, they will simply ignore it. they will lie, misrepresent, mislead, gaslight, selectively feign ignorance, whatever they need to do. they are right, and you are wrong. not even reality can sway them from this.

this is why the culture war is gay. there's no war. just retards huffing their own farts while patting themselves on the back for being smarter than everyone else.
 
Channel 5 responded to Nick Shirley's video

TLDW:
- Those cuts were made for brevity's sake
- Said cuts made Shirley look better because he talks like a retard
- Nick was fine with the video until he got backlash
- Andrew says he's correct about Denver prospering so he trimmed out the brief self doubt
- Andrew hates Trump/Republicans but dislikes the Democrat party too
-- He made it clear with Nick in the first place
Notice at the end he gets big mad about being recorded and caught and says from now on he's going to either do it live or paywall the full interviews?
 
Andrew says he's correct about Denver prospering so he trimmed out the brief self doubt
Ive been to Denver, I lived about an hour from Denver for 12 years, only moving about 2 years ago. It is not prospering, no graph will change my mind about what my own eyes can see. The nearby cities are alright but that is because of the expense to live in them and the demographics. But Denver is brutal.
 
Ive been to Denver, I lived about an hour from Denver for 12 years, only moving about 2 years ago. It is not prospering, no graph will change my mind about what my own eyes can see. The nearby cities are alright but that is because of the expense to live in them and the demographics. But Denver is brutal.

Denver in the 90’s and 00’s was pretty fucking awesome. I support legalizing weed but Colorado made the grave mistake of being the first in the nation to completely legalize it. It attracted way too many degenerates from the rest of the country who decided to apply their retarded Goon and Reddit worldviews onto local politics. I still visit CO periodically and the state will always hold a special place in my heart but Denver’s been allowed to rot. It’s still as a state doing far better than California and Washington.
 
Screenshot_20260421-152458_Brave.jpg
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo