US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
So is this good or bad?
It means the states can't have silly little requirements for federal litigation that are not in federal rules. For example, in that case, a man in Delaware sued for medical malpractice. Delaware law required him to submit an affidavit to proceed, something he failed to do.
 
Only three opinions released. No Callais or tariffs. They're really blueballing the people.
 
Good lord what a cope. Bondi hand-picked the girlboss who fumbled that one.
I agree with him, but not for the same reason. Rushing an indictment, especially with a hostile judiciary, won’t lead to any positive results. That is exactly what happened with the Comey case.


New decision:

FRCP Rule 60(b)(4) is bound by timeframes of FRCP Rule 60(c)(1)
Blueballed on tariffs and the VRA I see
 
It means the states can't have silly little requirements for federal litigation that are not in federal rules. For example, in that case, a man in Delaware sued for medical malpractice. Delaware law required him to submit an affidavit to proceed, something he failed to do.
And let’s not forget how utterly desperate it is of states to try to do that shit. The first Supreme Court precedent against it is from 1819
 
I'm surprised anyone would be unaware of this as it is a very controversial practice and widely criticized.
I'm not knowledgable about law in the slightest lol. I do recall some post sometime in the past talking about something to do with sentencing guidelines. Maybe I'm just conflating it with what you described the federal ones as though.
 
Makes me think we’ll get a positive ruling, if they wanted to push through an opinion that says “get fucked Trump you don’t have any authority over tariffs” they would have done so already.
I seem to remember a precedent that SCOTUS rulings that were controversial usually drop on Friday afternoons.
 
It is impossible that NY, CA, NJ, etc are not cooking the books similarly and engaged in similar financial and voting schemes.
I know this is extremely :optimistic: but my hope is Minnesota will be the test case for a major dismantling of the left’s power structure. Trumps initial moves with USAID and DEI are temporary since they can be erased immediately whenever a Dem gets in power.

The real problem we have is the enormous network of foreign and domestic agents both funding and funneling tax money into efforts to dismantle election security, law enforcement on every level, and installing an untouchable judiciary that can cause endless gridlock and chaos with no means to stop them.

I am praying that there is a lot of work being done to ensure that when arrests do come, they are ironclad and far reaching. That doesn’t happen by having meaningless arrests for social media that result in people getting released immediately. And if there is any way for a judge to allow that, they will. Trump and his entire team is aware of how fucked the judiciary is right now.

If they can prove that Minnesota has had intentional, systematic fraud with taxpayer money being used to subvert elections, directly involving congressman, the governor, the Minneapolis mayor, and any number of faceless bureaucrats, that will change the country. This is happening in every state with Dems in power (and likely many with R’s.) If MN can be cleansed, there will be ties to the whole network. Any investigation needs to be handled carefully because people know they will be crushed if they are willing to cooperate, only for some Dem judge to let everyone off with a slap on the wrist. It’s already happened with the few whistleblowers in MN Walz went after.

I’m also aware if this isn’t happening now, it never will.
so I can only guess this shit is being pushed by Reddit.
Reddit has been run by retarded foreigners and Democrats for fucking years. It’s not a secret. It’s literally a testing ground for messaging.
 
I would like to wish the Virginia GOP and all the glowie transplants from Arlington stubbed toes and car problems this frigid Appalachian morning.

Let's hope we see some good rulings from the SCOTUS today while I'm busy working.
 
I’m also aware if this isn’t happening now, it never will.
Another thing is that the Floyd riots unfortunately happened at the very end of Trump's first term, so technically they still have plenty of time to do what they need to do. Even with the midterms.

But yeah, they can just instantly revert everything. It's a nice warning of what may happen if they drop the ball a second time.

Hard to believe we are just at the beggining of the second year, it doesn't feel like it.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 8449639 Imagine if these targets were trans and gay people instead of Nazi and KKK. and here's the link of the website. https://www.punkwithacamera.com/
It’s kinda too cringe to care about, honestly

Like yeah, stupid idea as far as that some trannies might use these to increase their mouth frothing by 2%, but that’s a drop in the bucket, and this kind of gay cringe most likely does more to turn off whatever remaining moderates exist
 
Atrás
Top Abajo