leaders aren't all just a bunch of traitorous, self-seeking opportunists with no real convictions eager to sell out their own people for their own gain.
Even if they are copmletely self seeking, they need their citizen's respect to realize their own gain. If their own citizens hold them to a new kind of accountablitiy they'll be forced to play to it.
If people want to argue that America has no right to own Greenland, then why should Denmark have any ownership claims to Greenland? If the world recognizes Denmark's legal claims to Greenland because their ancestors conquered it once upon a time, then why shouldn't America have the right to obtain claims to Greenland today?
This is exactly the kind of logical fallacy that I'm talking about being exposed. People are asking these questions right now all over the place when before they had never even thought about them.
>Left spends years claiming europe has no right to own any of these places
>Trump says "yeah, I agree, so we're going to do stuff there"
>Left chimps out on TDS hormones and defends Denmark's right to own a piece of land
>Average citizen nootices
The point is, we are now in a time when leftists are viciously defending a European colony. And if we REALLY want to start nooticing, they're defending it from a country that's far less white than them. Denmark is 90% native danish while the USA is only 65% white.
This kind of demonstrative rhetoric is how the right has had most of its wins the past decades. "islam is right about women", "it's okay to be white", "yes let's give cops bodycams", "what is a woman". Very simple things that force them between two bad options, that's how you destroy a narrative structure and the narrative structure of the last 20 years been lefty favored.
T-Bone at the National Championship game with his family, many such cheers!
Sounds like the Cheerers cheered sooner but the booers bood longer. Who wins? News organizations and social media companies.
