I'll take your word for it here. My familiarity with the NWS is limited, and my industry has been little impacted since most large airports have their own weather radar. I would generally define overreach as the federal government commanding a state or otherwise non federal entity to commit an action, or to not commit an action, the impact of which would not have a disastrous impact on the entire rest of the union, and is not clearly outlined in the constitution. This times 1000 if the overreach in question extends from a beaurocracy. I don't buy the line that big tech is importing jeets due to a lack of skilled labor. If microsoft was hurting for skilled labor, they wouldn't have laid off 9,000 or so people this past year. As for ICE, I am not personally familiar with the cases you describe and thus cannot pass judgement, though I will note that arrested is not deported. As for the claim of racism against Trump there, I'm going to call hogwash without a direct reference since thats a pretty wild thing if actually true. NATO did come to our defense after 9/11. That was also over 20 years ago, and far far lower stakes. There is a stark difference between a few hundered angry rebels in the middle east, and the entire military and manufacturing might and reach of China. As for Greenland, believe it or not, I think its unfathomably stupid and insane to try and invade and take it by military force, and Trump would be a total lunatic to do it. Denmark's unwillingness to sell it means we need to renegotiate, not just take it. To be frank, even suggesting it like he has is really stupid.
As for premises: your premise was that MAGA originally supported releasing the Epstein files, then Trump decided not to, and then everyone flipped to not wanting them released. Your question to me is if I thought that was weird. I disagree with the premise, because you are asking me if I find a certain phenomena in the aggregate weird, when I do not recall ever seeing that phenomena occur. Again, I remember in this thread, people actually bashing Trump for gunt guarding the pedos therein. I do not at any point remember any substantive number of people agreeing and saying to not release the files. Basically, to answer your question, I would have to agree that a set of events occurred, that I do not believe occured to the extent you suggested. Yes as well, I conceded about interventionism, but not your question directly, because your question was about "Foreign wars" not "interventionism." The word choices matter here. Had you said interventionism instead of foreign wars I'd have agreed with you. I would agree that MAGA has become more accepting of the occasional drone strike and special operation, however I do not think MAGA would be accepting at all of Iraq 2: Electric Boogaloo. You make the assumption that the premises of your questions are so self evidently true, that no one could disagree with them, and that ergo us MAGAloids are simply dodging the questions. You provide no room for anyone to actually disagree with said premise in the first place. Do you see how insulting it is to be called a mongoloid specifically because the person making the insult thinks himself incapable of having an incorrect view?
