NWS was not cut, merely reduced in size, which I suspect is less of an issue that it might have been 10 years ago due to advances in technology. Things that needed to be totally axed, like USAID and CRS have thankfully received the neccesary total cut.
Not true at all. Weather forecasts have been fucked since NWS spending happened. Don't you remember the Texas floods? That happened because Trump cut NWS spending.
Should we not cut any government beaurocracies?
We should if there's a reason to, but wanting to only so that billionaires can get tax cuts is pretty stupid
That is a very vague and inflammatory accusation. I can't really respond to that without more specifics.
Also vague and inflammatory. What I do know in specifics here is a desire to cut the DOE and transfer its duties else, both as a cost reduction measure, and to return more power over education concerns to the state level rather than federal level.
Do you prefer that power to remain centralized with the federal government?
Yes, otherwise we have retarded educational policies like Florida teaching black kids that slavery was to their benefit. MAGA wants education cut because, in Trump's own words, the poorly educated love him.
Should people who aren't white not be punished? Should Decarlos Brown Jr. not be punished? Should Sebastian Zapeta-Calil not be punished? Should Harjinder Singh not be punished? Are the FBI crime stats all incorrect and racist?
People who commit crimes should be punished, whether they're white, brown or anything. However, arrested random brown people, even ones here legally, and sending them to prison camps in El Salvador is indeed racism.
If you're meaning Europe, I would remind you that of our 32 NATO allies, only 1/3 of them meet their gdp spending requirements, and all of them heavily tariff American products that threaten their domestic industries. If you're meaning Canada, that was driven heavily by Canada refusing to police their border more to help stop Fent trafficking. If you're meaning Mexico, they are giving the same problem, just magnified substantially. I would agree that alienating Japan is rude and unnecessary, though I don't think they've been all that alienated.
Should any of those allies not aquies to the requests/demands made of them?
Except our spending to NATO is a literal drop in the bucket. You don't mind more than that being spent to prop up billionaire profits. Besides, if you are so worried about Greenland being invaded by China or Russia, that's the whole purpose of NATO.
Alright.
I don't particularly remeber that being the way things went. In fact in this thread I remember A LOT of people bashing Trump hard for not releasing them, and getting pretty mad about it in general. People were upset with Bondi too for her part in the matter iirc.
I will say I do think MAGA has become less anti-interventionist than it was originally, though in both cases that I can think of, the operations were short, and in the case of Solemani, just a drone strike. I'd hesitate to call either case a "Foreign War" though they are certainly interventionist, and in the case of Solemani I'm still unsure if that was truly neccesary for us to be involved with.
Yes, plenty of MAGAloids in this thread are now saying that Trump being a pedo protector or even a pedo himself is no big deal.
So no, you didn't really answer my question. Don't you think it's weird how quickly you and your fellow Trump lovers will change your opinion on a subject if he does the opposite? Stop dodging the question.
I have zero doubt that Trump could send US troops to Greenland or Iran or Venezuela and you and your fellow MAGA in this thread would cheer it on. Same thing happened with tariffs, when "GREAT RESET BAD!" suddenly turned to "HIGH PRICES GUD! YOULL HAVE NOTHING AND YOULL LIKE IT!" and then when tariffs were paused, suddenly stopping tariffs was good again.
Also, for the love of god, if you want me to reply to you again, don't do the stupid line-by-line quote thing. Replying to that is tedious and awful.