US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Thats all well and good, but do you think he will TARIFF them into giving up a country? Really? This is not tactically sound in any way, and reminds me of his Canada 51st state ramblings.
no, obviously the tariffs are one of a multitude of different things. not to mention the difference between the canada shit and this is that several involved parties have had already preliminary meetings to discuss this, and there will be future meetings to continue discussing it. greenland has even been made to question exactly why they aren't allowed to negotiate for themselves after denmark swore up and down it was totally fine bro, no one cared if greenland got bought they should just do it right.

now, suddenly, everyone cares, and the demoralization agents have shifted to greenland never happening, yourself included. i don't believe in coincidence, so to me it's a suspect happening that i believe indicates that europe believes trump is serious, the demoralizers believe he is serious, and i believe he is serious. the only people saying he's not are retarded morons not paying attention to how greenland is basically GOLDLAND when you look at how valuable it is, and monroe doctrine being part of trump's new plan going forward it would seem.
 
Harmeet Dhillon should be getting the lawsuit ready to sue MN on behalf of MN citizens who have been disenfranchised by the gay governor and mayor's refusal to offer basic services to its people. Use the power the way the fag liberals do.

If anyone is going to go down to fuck with the antifa fags, you gotta make sure you have backup or wolverine claws or something, two people vs. 20 isn't going to work. Look how they swarm like literal bugmen looking to pull you into a rape pile, you need to make sure space is clear.
 
Leftist violence doesn't have this filter. They'll attack that police officer arresting their comrade, they'll trade decades of jail time for absolutely retarded shit. It's unfortunately really effective in a certain sense, so long as they have the numbers to absorb the arrests. But it's also a system that threatens to backfire badly one day.
Because they mostly don't suffer consequences in any meaningful way from it, the system coddles them almost every step of the way to ensure they almost never even see the jailhouse, let alone the courthouse. The only time a leftist might suffer consequences is if they provoke it in the heat of the moment like Good did or the pooner that lost an eye to a less-lethal round.
 
>Gets corner clipped by the car for a moment
>Steps out of the way
>Raises the gun with solid posture (still out of the way)
>Empties the clip into the woman going like 5mph (STILL clear out of the way)
>Skidaddle skidoodles (you know like a criminal)

But he did bump his gunt though so totally worth executing asap
this post is fucking hilarious to me because it poses the hypothetical idea of a tolerable threshold of how much you're allowed to physically assault law enforcement before it's allowed to respond

i'm imagining now an alternate universe where protestors carry pneumatic "punching" devices that are carefully calibrated to hit a target with exactly 1 PSI less than the "unacceptable force" threshold and the police carrying little devices that are like spedometers for force and everyone on all sides are running around shoving their incredibly meticulous "is it assault or not?" doodads at each other

this is the face of protest that liberals want
 
The riots aren't really big enough to fill the news cycle constantly like the Floyd Riots. They aren't doing much to impede ICE operations.
Something might happen with Iran once that aircraft carrier finally makes it within launching range. Probably some more whining about Greenland from Europeans.
Unless Trump officially pulls the IA, I don't see much happening at this point in time.
Basically my take. Keep containing the protesters and they’ll eventually die out.

Feds arrest multiple rioters at the Whipple building, Attempts to “de-arrest” result in total feltings.
 
This reminds me of a joke my granddad told me once.

A cowboy, a black guy, and an Indian (feather) are sitting around a campfire out on the range. The Indian sighs, looks up and says "once, my people were many...but now, we are few."
The black guy says "well, once my people were few, but now we're many!"
And the cowboy grins, spits out his tobacco, and says...
"Well...that's because we haven't played cowboys and niggers yet."
 
this post is fucking hilarious to me because it poses the hypothetical idea of a tolerable threshold of how much you're allowed to physically assault law enforcement before it's allowed to respond
*with irreversible and instant deadly force
Yes

Clean the boot out of your mouth please
 
Harmeet Dhillon should be getting the lawsuit ready to sue MN on behalf of MN citizens who have been disenfranchised by the gay governor and mayor's refusal to offer basic services to its people. Use the power the way the fag liberals do.

If anyone is going to go down to fuck with the antifa fags, you gotta make sure you have backup or wolverine claws or something, two people vs. 20 isn't going to work. Look how they swarm like literal bugmen looking to pull you into a rape pile, you need to make sure space is clear.
boy have you put your eggs in the wrong fucking basket, saar.
1768692960938.png


this post is fucking hilarious to me because it poses the hypothetical idea of a tolerable threshold of how much you're allowed to physically assault law enforcement before it's allowed to respond

i'm imagining now an alternate universe where protestors carry pneumatic "punching" devices that are carefully calibrated to hit a target with exactly 1 PSI less than the "unacceptable force" threshold and the police carrying little devices that are like spedometers for force and everyone on all sides are running around shoving their incredibly meticulous "is it assault or not?" doodads at each other

this is the face of protest that liberals want
i like my breakdown from last page, because it goes into the exact specifics of the local laws on this (so people who live there should be familiar with them, and all these retards claim to live there despite having out of state plates) being a straight line of this stupid bint's own decisions coming back with consequences. instead of caring for her kids, she's out ICE-chasing. instead of simply 'legally observing' from a safe distance like a lot of these retards, she decides to physically block them, as if she has any legal authority or right to do so. then she refuses multiple lawful orders (which is almost anything a cop tells you to do at that point), AND her wife is on video telling her to drive baby drive, AND THEN she is seen staring at the cop while she floors the car, you can hear the engine fucking rev. then she HITS THE COP, instead of reversing at the VERY LEAST. there are 5 separate points during this interaction alone that could have completely saved her life, and they are all on her. the officer's actions don't even enter the picture until she is actively driving THROUGH him.
 
this post is fucking hilarious to me because it poses the hypothetical idea of a tolerable threshold of how much you're allowed to physically assault law enforcement before it's allowed to respond

i'm imagining now an alternate universe where protestors carry pneumatic "punching" devices that are carefully calibrated to hit a target with exactly 1 PSI less than the "unacceptable force" threshold and the police carrying little devices that are like spedometers for force and everyone on all sides are running around shoving their incredibly meticulous "is it assault or not?" doodads at each other

this is the face of protest that liberals want
A violence breathalyzer LMAO

Cops showing up to a call for a domestic incident "Sir, have you been beating your wife tonight?"
 
With all due respect there are 3,000 agents in Minneapolis right now. I wouldn’t characterize that as doing nothing.

Ver archivo adjunto 8437500
Not sure how true this is but I wouldn’t be surprised.
I'm not dooming. I'm saying the libs have decided the feds won't really do anything - despite arrests and the one shooting, the libs have mobbed the feds at least once, and the feds ran rather than killing them all. This, and both Jacob Frey and Tim Waltz saying "tee hee, I'm not telling you to fight ICE, but golly gosh, I'm just saying somebody sure is likely to fight ICE!!" has emboldened them to believe that they simply haven't been organized and violent enough to eject the feds from Minnesota. The only way it ends is if a flash mob around a police car is put down with live ammo. Not tear gas. Not arrests. It ends the day everybody gets shot.

That fraud helped in that case.
I'm talking about the riots, not the election. The left won and was able to riot as much as they wanted until they got what they wanted, which was defunding municipal PDs.
 
*with irreversible and instant deadly force
Yes

Clean the boot out of your mouth please
"you should only be able to shoot back at someone if they've already killed you first."

you are monumentally retarded.

I'm not dooming. I'm saying the libs have decided the feds won't really do anything - despite arrests and the one shooting, the libs have mobbed the feds at least once, and the feds ran rather than killing them all. This, and both Jacob Frey and Tim Waltz saying "tee hee, I'm not telling you to fight ICE, but golly gosh, I'm just saying somebody sure is likely to fight ICE!!" has emboldened them to believe that they simply haven't been organized and violent enough to eject the feds from Minnesota.
i repeat my earlier assertion. they know that what it takes to really crack skulls is to have an ICE officer killed. so far it hasn't happened, though not for lack of trying. until that happens, it won't pop off for real.
 
More than that, in her case, is that she's from showbiz, the bottom-up rural-religious cheerleader/pageant kind, and they all look and act off-putting in a specific way. It reads as loser pretender to "elites," as old boy network gold-digger whore to regular shitheads, and very weird and vulgar to anyone not accustomed to the wrestling/megachurch/Liberace aesthetic—the one that Trump, back when he was just a "lifestyles of the rich and famous" type guy, made universal, from Atlantic City to Dubai to Keeping up with the Kardashians.

counterpoint: this kind of oil/rancher money showbiz-beauty pageant- dance competition world is the only vector for training young women to be personable and feminine we have in the US anymore. Everything else is aggressively ungendered. so if you're a man who wants a political career, and you're on the right, it makes perfect sense to pick a ballerina-farm-world wife. Erika Kirk was never supposed to be leading anything, she was supposed to be a political wife. She was waaaaay over on the mar-a-lago/WWF/Trump aesthetic side of that world, the ballerina farm lady is way on the other side where Mormons pretend to be WASPs, but it's the same world. (And ballerina farm lady's husband isn't involved in national politics.)

What you're describing as hopelessly vulgar is what the president of the United States likes and so that is the political wife aesthetic right now. When JD Vance is president, the political wife aesthetic will be a bunch of women with standing weekly waxing appointments and law degrees pretending they don't wear tight sweaters on purpose. And it will honestly suck worse for those women, because it's just as difficult to maintain the appearance and manage the wife jobs, but unlike the bimbo version you're supposed to also be a lawyer.
 
They hate America but what they expect to get if they "win" doesn't exist. The reality is they will live in a world that hates them whether they win or lose.
Wrong. When, not if, they win, anyone with even slightly right-wing beliefs will either be locked up or killed, just like Charlie Kirk. They will import infinity third worlders into America to the point where the white race no longer exists. They will have ultimate control over all art and culture, not just in America, but the world. The world from 2029 until the end of human history will be the most nightmarish amalgamation of 1984, Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451, and gay race communism. The suicide rate of conservative white males will far surpass that of trannies while gay race communists live their best lives. The future under the next Democrat president will be everything the left has ever wanted and more.

People like Milo Yiannopoulos, Curtis Yarvin, and Auron MacIntyre have been warning you that this would happen for years. I imagine they'll have a brief moment of vindication after November 2028, before finally blowing their brains out, confident in the fact that they have no place in the future.
 
*with irreversible and instant deadly force
Yes

Clean the boot out of your mouth please
What do you mean I cant hit the officer with my car?!? It won't even be THAT hard!(If they do die, they are a freaking gestapo that deserve it and more rammings should happen btw)

You must be a freaking BOOT LICKER!!!!


Please grow up chuddy
no, obviously the tariffs are one of a multitude of different things. not to mention the difference between the canada shit and this is that several involved parties have had already preliminary meetings to discuss this, and there will be future meetings to continue discussing it. greenland has even been made to question exactly why they aren't allowed to negotiate for themselves after denmark swore up and down it was totally fine bro, no one cared if greenland got bought they should just do it right.
It's exactly the same, he has presented each countries' leadership with potentially annexation, a move that is soundly rejected by leadership AND the population. Essentially he starts talks with non-starters.

Yes I am aware that tends to be the 'Trump' negotiating tactic (You guys see we made a deal with Taiwan finally?) but it needs to be pointed out he gets senile and badgers endlessly on propositions that are non-starters.
now, suddenly, everyone cares, and the demoralization agents have shifted to greenland never happening, yourself included. i don't believe in coincidence, so to me it's a suspect happening that i believe indicates that europe believes trump is serious, the demoralizers believe he is serious, and i believe he is serious. the only people saying he's not are retarded morons not paying attention to how greenland is basically GOLDLAND when you look at how valuable it is, and monroe doctrine being part of trump's new plan going forward it would seem.
I absolutely believe he is serious about wanting it, but is he serious enough that he will not TACO with consistent BTFOing?

Nooooo
 
while gay race communists live their best lives.
They hate America but what they expect to get if they "win" doesn't exist. The reality is they will live in a world that hates them whether they win or lose.
Actual gay race communists are almost invariably depressed, neurotic wrecks and this isn't going to change even if they 'win'. Leftoids love to claim that rightoids are fine being oppressed and generally shat on in life as long as the 'other' is getting it worse but this is pretty much just pure projection.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo