What do you mean by "educated?" Like going to one of the Marxist indoctrination centers that churns out retarded trannies? No thanks.
In no way is giving birth the equivalent to going to war. If given the choice between staying home and birthing a child vs. getting their guts blown out while freezing to death fighting Germans in Bastogne, women could consider it a coin flip? Get real, please.
Women fumble through life believing their rights simply exist in a vacuum. It's as if nature itself has oriented to provide them this stable space to make demands to the ones enforcing literally all of their rights. You can have R2D2 project an interactive 4D pie chart showing their votes will result in more women raped, less freedoms for everyone, and total economic collapse. Their response would be, "OMG, YOU WANT TO TAKE AWAY MY RIGHTS?!"
A single vote when you're in your 20s and moved out, 2-4 votes when you get a wife, kids, pay taxes instead of receiving hand outs. I am trying to tie it to the achievable goals of a normal productive member of society without creating a nobility class. And I think the way you do that is by not having it inherited but having it be meaningful things. Like white productive household represent around 40% of the vote, in my case it would be 60-70%.
By giving the makers more of a say. I think it's obvious. Ideally I would have it that people dependent on government handouts should not have a vote, but that breaks my idea of not removing universal suffrage, even though I think it's possibly the most appealing form of reducing it.
I don't think human nature is as inflexible as some people think and it has changed over time as such you can surmise you can change it at will with sufficient effort.
A family member's girlfriend once complained that he "always argued like he knew his information authoritatively." To my knowledge she only ever won a single argument with the guy. There's something to be said for occasionally having humility, but they never seem to grasp that sore losers are rarely subtle about it.
In a civic sense, it's not so much equivalent as complementary. Men protect the frontline, women make sure there's a next generation. Both are necessary if you want a nation to continue. If one were absolutely dead set on female suffrage, they might stipulate that only married women with no divorces or abortions under their belt could vote. It still doesn't undo the fundamental issue that they could undo the restriction without significant cultural pressure, but it's at least better reasoned than "they admit to being easily manipulated profligates but should be allowed to vote anyway."
If the account has never had a pfp, it's upwards of $20k; otherwise maybe $4.
By tying the baseline to zero, nobody gets a chance or reason to build for anything but themselves. There is no incentive to build for the future in your model. That is why I said I don't see it working for more than a few generations before it breaks down. Again, may as well have the commies. You aren't going to magically legislate human nature away any more successfully than the Russians had in making The New Soviet Man.
This is the height of arrogance, and its so common today that it is legitimately frightening to people who don't share your naivete. Human behavior is as complex and diverse as our biology. Your grandmother will burn down a nursery school if the right pressure is applied. And some powerful people have spent decades and untold billions of dollars learning how to use those pressures to manipulate societies.
I agree that women play a crucial role in our society, especially during war times. Women working in factories sealed the fate for women's suffrage, I think. I genuinely believe that women play the greatest role in our civilization. They don't build or maintain societies, invent or improve shit (on big scales), or do other things men simply can't. Men are the builders of societies. But women do something greater, which is build the builders.
Dear God that is stupid. “He banned users that were problems for years.” Okay? Wahhh, nigger. Seriously, Android took over whole ass threads with her schizo bullshit. But no, it’s because we are right wing or something. Fuck off.
not to mention he is missing the context of everything else. ssj_ness was constantly injecting politics into everything. He was annoying and got a pink triangle. And yeah maybe he expressed his opinion on a teenaged girl being molested poorly but if your opinion isn't anything other than "that entire event is wrong" then maybe you shouldn't say anything at all. But oh no, ssj_ness had to double-down on his words because who knows? Just stupid and annoying. That's why he was banned. Popular sentiment. Oh and he was rightwing AF so get out of here with that bias accusation.
The guy's trolling. ssj_ness was a huge rightwing politisperg who could not turn it off and flamed HHH constantly, but the bad opinion he got banned for was victim-blaming an underage victim of a sex crime. Android raptor got banned (so I hear) for spamming massively unpleasant gore drawings to disrupt threads.
You think the average person with maxed-out 30% APR credit cards was going to benefit from clean energy credits?
That should conjures image of an attractive woman, which is the exact opposite of android raptor fat ass in a leather bikini.
I had a very learned friend who referred to it as "weaving a magnificent tapestry of bullshit."
>do nothing types
