Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[FamicomGorby]

What trial? A trial with no witnesses? Just a slurping, drooling retard?

I would really like to see Greer picking a jury. Would he strike anyone who is not a whore and below an eight?

 

[Harvey Danger]

What trial? A trial with no witnesses? Just a slurping, drooling retard?

Not to sound like a broken record, but the only reason he "can not call witnesses" is because of that weak stipulation with Hardin. The minute Greer understands the implication, he's going to break the stip and disclose a few randoms out of desperation. Even if he does it late, that's exactly the kind of misunderstanding judges would forgive when assisting a poor little pro se litigant.

Hardin's "penalty" of calling his family won't help his case much. It'll also be fought tooth-and-nail by Russ, because he always fights everything Hardin does, even when he himself agreed to the terms.

 

[Farmer McColl]

What trial? A trial with no witnesses? Just a slurping, drooling retard?

"The prosecution may now present their case."
"Shank you your honor. The defensh is cruel and has no defensh. The proshecushun reshtsh."
"I- uh... okay. Defense?"
"Your honor, defense moves for summary dismissal... again."
"Granted. Case dismissed."

~Some poor Utah courthouse, three years hence

 

[HackerX]

Can we close the thread until the new year or something please?

Hrm. Wouldn't that create a paradox or something? Nature dictates something ridiculous gets filed when this thread gets locked, but nothing can happen because everything essentially ceases operations until after the new year. Think of the possible ramifications here. Black holes forming type shit.

 

[CansOfCant]

I would really like to see Greer picking a jury. Would he strike anyone who is not a whore and below an eight?

"Mossshion to shhrrike zhuurrrurrr nuh-hurrr ssshhhixxsss6 fohhhr vveee-eeing ahh fahhhy-ich-aaahhyy."

motion to strike juror #6 for being a fatty mcpatty

 

[sallowhal]

we're at the "role playing russ" phase. thread lock down is imminent

 

[AnOminous]

Even if he does it late, that's exactly the kind of misunderstanding judges would forgive when assisting a poor little pro se litigant.

Literally nobody is going to show up to testify on the behalf of slurping, drooling, retard boy.

Seriously, name a single person who will show up, go to court, appear in court, and then testify on behalf of retard boy. Name that person. I mean someone who's still alive, too. Not someone who died a couple years ago despite Russ insisting he was eager to testify.

 

[DumbDude43]

Literally nobody is going to show up to testify on the behalf of slurping, drooling, retard boy.

Seriously, name a single person who will show up, go to court, appear in court, and then testify on behalf of retard boy. Name that person. I mean someone who's still alive, too. Not someone who died a couple years ago despite Russ insisting he was eager to testify.

plenty of cows with a grudge against null would do it
how helpful it would be for greers case is a different question though

 

[LobsterBoy669]

Can we close the thread until the new year or something please?

Or until there's a new filing... which probably won't be until the new year. So yeah, fully fucking agree.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Please lock the thread before more people give Russell advice

 

[Mr. Hands]

Please lock the thread before more people give Russell advice

He should totally bring Cyraxx into his lolsuit.

 

[Summary Judgment]

Since the legal thread is locked, here is an updated version of obsdj's excellent list of open motions. Beware my errors, omissions, and typos.

Date​	ECF No.​	Party​	Description​	Notes​
04/15/25	274	Defense	Motion to Dismiss	Hardin later suggested (not motioned) that the Court's ruling wait until the SCOTUS decision in Cox v. Sony. ECF No. 359.
05/18/25	299	Plaintiff	Motion for Sanctions	Seeks Rule 11 sanctions for Hardin's investigation of Greer's personal and business dealings, such as the Winnemucca public records requests. Threatens a bar complaint. Hardin claims motion is vague and improperly filed. ECF No. 302.
05/22/25	313	Defense	Motion for Leave to View ECF No. 1	Pursuant to Hardin's investigation into Greer's potentially fraudulent claims of poverty in IFP application.
05/22/25	314	Plaintiff	Motion for a Protective Order	Seeks a Rule 26 order (governing discovery) to block Hardin's investigations of Greer. However, discovery is already stayed per ECF No. 283, and Hardin's investigations do not violate the discovery stay.
06/05/25	330	Defense	Motion for Sanctions	Seeks Rule 11 sanctions for the subpoena Greer improperly obtained while discovery was stayed pursuant to the Court's order at ECF No. 283.
06/05/25	331	Plaintiff	Motion for "Clarification" and Modification of ECF No. 283	Seeks to modify the discovery stay at ECF No. 283 so Greer can subpoenna Null for KF user information in order serve to two additional defendants.
07/15/25	346	Plaintiff	Motion for Sanctions	Again seeks Rule 11 sanctions for Hardin's investigations of Greer. Asks for attorney's fees. Hardin claims pro se litigants are ineligible for attorney's fees and the motion was improperly filed. ECF No. 348.
07/31/25	350	Defense	Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's Access to Electronic Filing and Service	Argues that Greer abuses the electronic filing system by filing many untrue and unresearched motions that the defense must incur costs by responding to. Reminds Court that Greer is using a false mailing address.
10/15/25	367	Plaintiff	Motion for Extension of Time	Re: ECF No. 362, which ordered Greer to show cause on the Utah docs. Untimely filed.
10/16/25	369	Plaintiff	Motion for Extension of Time	Largely duplicates ECF No. 367, but includes Greer's proposed reponse to the order to show cause.
11/23/25	385	Plaintiff	Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document	Seeks to file "private non-party information" and "other sensitive details." Hardin later claims this description is untrue, and the documement instead contains information about Russell and false allegations of harassment by defendants. ECF No. 392.
11/24/25	387	Defense	Motion to Strike and/or Reservice of ECF No. 385	Greer did not serve the defense an unredacted version of ECF No. 386, which is the document he filed for leave to file under seal at ECF No. 385. Russell claims he later remedied this erroor by serving an unredacted version. ECF No.389.
12/04/25	394	Plaintiff	Motion for a Protective Order and Sanctions	Again seeks a Rule 26 order to block Hardin's investigation and the witness disclosure of "Natalie Banks" (a prostitute with alleged knowledge of Greer's activities in NV). Additionally, seeks sanctions under Rule 37.
12/06/25	397	Defense	Motion to Proceed by Pseudonym for Natalie Banks	Seeks to allow a potential witness to proceed under her pseydonym to protect her from plaintiff's retaliation.
12/08/25	400	Plaintiff	Motion to Disqualify Defense Counsel	Due to Hardin's investigation of Greer. Hardin notes Greer describes this as a "sanction," ECF No. 402, so this may be another duplicative Rule 11 motion.
12/09/25	402	Defense	Motion to Strike ECF No. 400, and Alternative Motion for an Extension of Time and Evidentiary Hearing.	Seeks to strike as in bad faith or an attempt to evade Rule 11 service requirements. Court did not rule on request for an extension of the. Arguments preserved for the record at ECF No. 425.
12/10/25	406	Plaintiff	Motion to "Strike and Exclude Improper Witness Disclosure"	Re: disclosure of Waylon Huber, a Winnimuca realtor whose initials "W. H." are listed as a Managing Member of Greer's "adult entertainment" company ID NV, LLC.
12/12/25	411	Plaintiff	Motion to "Strike Witness Disclosure"	Re: disclosure of Natalie Banks, former NV prostitute with alleged knowledge of Greer.
12/12/25	412	Defense	Motion for a Preservation Order	Re: evidence of Greer's Venmo and Zelle payments, which may be relevant to Greer's claims of poverty and ECF No. 313.
12/15/25	417	Defense	Motion to Complete the Record	Under Fed R. Evid 106, seeks to compel Greer to produce his entire book, Why I Sued Taylor Swift: and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy, which was partially introduced by Greer in ECF No. 415.
12/20/25	423	Plaintiff	Motion to "Strike and Exclude Improper Witness Disclosure"	Re: disclosure of Roger Baylocq, a Winnimuca businessman who owns a family-friendly hotel. Greer wanted the local governnment to give him Baylocq's land via eminent domain so Greer could start a brothel.
12/20/25	424	Plaintiff	Motion for Sanctions	Seeks Rule 31 sanctions for defense's witness disclosures of Natalie Banks, Waylon Huber, and Roger Baylocq.

This list excludes the defense's Request to Submit for Decision (ECF No. 409) and suggestion (not motion) that the Court to issue an injunction against parallel state court litigation (ECF No. 421) such as Greer's ex parte application for a restraining order against Hardin in the Nevada Justice Court.

My working theory is that the judges correctly see that Greer and Null are highly litigous. (Greer is also vexatious but that's another matter.) Knowing that, to the extent the judges even think about this case, I suspect they want to dispose of it with (i) minimal effort and (ii) in a way that it won't come back after another 10th Circuit appeal. While I would like them to simply dismiss on the many other grounds availible, the Court may require either a settlement or a dispositive trial. Therefore, I tend to think the Court will approve of motions that add financial pressure for the parties to settle, and deny motions that provide offramps from the death march to trial (a/k/a Null's trail of tears).

So, my guess is that the Court will deny or ignore Greer's many meritless motions. Maybe the Court grants ECF No. 346, despite its untimeliness, since dismissal is a potential sanction for Greer's discovery noncompliance. Even if the lawsuit is dismissed on those grounds, contra my working theory, I think the Court will want to cut off that potential argument in Russell's appeal.

Similarly, I think the Court will deny Hardin's motion to revoke Greer's ECF access. Under my theory, ECF access runs up Null's costs at the cost of minimal busywork for the clerks. As long as the Court can ignore Greer's meritless motions, I think they'll continue to allow access. This is one motion I would most like to see granted. Maybe the Court will think revoking access will pressure Greer to settle? But that just re-opens the issue of Greer's home address.

I'm not sure about the defense's other motions. On my theory, the Court will deny or ignore anything related to the allegation of IFP appllication fraud. They might deny or ignore the motion for sanctions from the improperly issued subpoenna, ECF No. 330, since the subpoenna was never served and denial will avoid infinity motions for reconsideration. Although, again, maybe they grant so as to drive up costs for both sides. The motion to complete the record, ECF No. 417, is hilarious and another one I'd most like to see granted. However, I'm not sure the Court wants to open the (novel?) legal issue of introducing the entire work subject to the instant copyright dispute into the public record via pacer and courtlistener.

Obviously, I would like the Court to dismiss with prejudice on every ground availible; award all possible sanctions, costs, and fees to Null; declare Russell a vexatious litigant in all federal courts; garnish his wages; and put him in prison until he provides the Nevada TRO application. I'm not holding my breath.

TL;DR there are 22 open motions (13 plaintiff and 9 defense) and over 200 filings this year. Current issues include the defense's motion to dismiss, motion to see Greer's sealed IFP application, motion for a preservation order; plaintiff's motions for a protective order; various motions for extension of time, various motions to strike (incl. striking witness disclosures), and various motions for sanctions (including disqualification of Hardin).​

 

[Useful_Mistake]

ECF 427 (I'm back)

 

[Bloitzhole]

I am glad Russell changed his name, that's gonna be handy for future lawsuits

 

[goblin enby]

Trying to get a restraining order on Hardin is "unrelated". Very interesting.

Edit: Nevermind, hard to keep track of all Greee's unrelated litigation

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Ver archivo adjunto 8349870
Trying to get a restraining order on Hardin is "unrelated". Very interesting.

This is referring to his "I NEEED DA HOES" lawsuit he filed recently against Nevada

 

[DavidS877]

And so it continues. Welcome back U_M.

ECF 427 as Images.

Spoiler: 4 pages

 

[FamicomGorby]

Ver archivo adjunto 8349870
Trying to get a restraining order on Hardin is "unrelated". Very interesting.

It's refrencing a statement from Greer's lawsuit against the Secretary of State of Nevada.

Greer's argument here is he's competent and brilliant when he feels like he did something right and just a poor pro se retard who goofed up in good faith when he frequently fucks up.

 

[teriyakiburns]

lmao he was filing right up to Christmas, but the clerks just couldn't be fucked to enter it until today. I wonder what else will show up.

 

[Farmer McColl]

Short, stupid, repetitive, and lacking any citations. An unfortunately boring entry in the Greer docket of shame.

It is surprising how many sentences and paragraphs just switch topics midway through however. I almost feel like he cut out a bunch of lines.