US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Bookmark and Screenshot it chuds!
The republicans WILL lose the house and at best keep the senate with a thin margin, the same might happen vise versa(House kept, senate lost).

If this does not come to pass, i WILL wear a burgersuit.
Eat a bacon cheeseburger as well with a nice Christmas ale. Actually I want that for dinner now.
 

Bookmark and Screenshot it chuds!
The republicans WILL lose the house and at best keep the senate with a thin margin, the same might happen vise versa(House kept, senate lost).

If this does not come to pass, i WILL wear a burgersuit.
Screenshot_20251220_161206_Brave.jpg
Had already screenshoted my bookmark before SYM beat me too it.

I'm not for certain will keep both seats of Congress, but I think the current dooming is too early and socially manipulated, and doomers need to be made an example of.

Also, I've donned the suit myself expecting there to still be shenanigans election night last year, so it's in good spirits.
 
if ONLY there had been a democrat president after epstein was convicted, perhaps an old white former VP, who could have declassified all the documents, and made them public. strangely, they didn't do that. i know you won't respond to this because you're a cowardly, queer nigger who comes here to stir shit, but if you had a single bone in your jelly-like spine you'd at least attempt to come up with a cope for why the biden admin sat on apparently gigabytes of trump being a pedophile and never released it, even once they knew he won the presidency.

i know you won't respond to me. you literally don't have a single word to say in defense of your argument other than that you really, REALLY want it to be true. you know there was no reason other than protecting democrats in the files, and that if trump had been in them they would have been leaked like so many other things were leaked. at the end of the day, you're a pedophile defender, as long as they wear your color jersey. it's why no one in that thread has given one fuck about the clinton pics, and why they all make up reasons for them to be fine, but the moment one of you comes in here, while we're not bothering you, to sit and go YEAH WE KNOW IT'S COMING FAGGOTS JUST YOU WAIT.

surely, this time they'll get donald trump. here is your award.
Ver archivo adjunto 8311392
Trump is many things. He isn't a pred. He fucks blonde bimbo whores, cheats on every woman he's married, and in all that time, he has never indicated that he wants to have sex with a child. He likes porn stars, not 12 year olds.
 
there was never a child
personally i take issue with this. even if there never was a child, these men think there was one, and the intent is to go after someone who is too young to make good decisions for themselves so that they can exert power and influence. the sex is usually secondary, though with the recent wave of giga gooners that wouldn't be too shocking.

the people who are busted talking to children are almost 100% recidivists too, so these people will continue to do this. research also shows that pornography addiction, where it affects these cases, does continue to get worse for most people, and people begin seeking out a stronger hit of dopamine as they get used to the high from the old ones. this is why so many trannies end up as pedophiles, because they started as groomed gooners and evolved into the very thing that hit them.

He fucks blonde bimbo whores
pam bondi definitely sucked his dick, this stupid cunt has no reason to be where she's at, her record is nowhere near good enough.
 
if ONLY there had been a democrat president after epstein was convicted, perhaps an old white former VP, who could have declassified all the documents, and made them public. strangely, they didn't do that. i know you won't respond to this because you're a cowardly, queer nigger who comes here to stir shit, but if you had a single bone in your jelly-like spine you'd at least attempt to come up with a cope for why the biden admin sat on apparently gigabytes of trump being a pedophile and never released it, even once they knew he won the presidency.

i know you won't respond to me. you literally don't have a single word to say in defense of your argument other than that you really, REALLY want it to be true. you know there was no reason other than protecting democrats in the files, and that if trump had been in them they would have been leaked like so many other things were leaked. at the end of the day, you're a pedophile defender, as long as they wear your color jersey. it's why no one in that thread has given one fuck about the clinton pics, and why they all make up reasons for them to be fine, but the moment one of you comes in here, while we're not bothering you, to sit and go YEAH WE KNOW IT'S COMING FAGGOTS JUST YOU WAIT, we're not going to be be nearly as nice to you as the other retards in your favorite beauty parlor thread.

surely, this time they'll get donald trump. here is your award.
Ver archivo adjunto 8311392
What's your script for all the redactions exactly?
 
Just as off-putting and inarticulate as ever. God I hope she runs again. Every four years, until she dies or I do.
I just realized there is a whole group of people who have grown up only knowing presidential elections with Trump in them, 3 back to back hard fought campaigns has to be some kind of record, Roosevelt was basically cake walking every one of his elections.

Also twitter is making alot of hay about the vanity fair photoshoot, apparently it was done in a way to deliberately make the Trump admin look bad.

I think they are on some shit you need to have gone to a liberal arts school and spent $100,000 on a nonsense major to understand.
1766269971184.png

funny skit I have half baked is the brain of a modern day leftist in a 1930s jew in Germany

"We have photographed Hitler next to lighbulb, this will give away his height to the reader and his downfall will surely be close behind"
 
I just realized there is a whole group of people who have grown up only knowing presidential elections with Trump in them,
I’m one of them.

Also twitter is making alot of hay about the vanity fair photoshoot, apparently it was done in a way to deliberately make the Trump admin look bad
Those photos do look pretty shitty, but I’m not pretentious enough to quantify exactly why they’re shitty.
 
I remember this photo as well, where was that initially shown? It was horrible. I would never have remembered that but now that you mention it I can clearly remember it.
Thanks for giving me some validation that I'm not insane. I'm pretty sure it was in a us politics and the hunter laptop threads, but no idea if the images are even up and I remember a poster mentioning how hard that image was getting purged.
 
I'm gonna up the ante and say get a semi auto rifle. Even for home. Better control, better accuracy, easier to use, generally a larger capacity magazine, usually better stopping rounds. Yes, 9mm is fine, but if MFer is cracked out on PCP or some shit I'd rather have something more better. Or if THEY'RE armed, I'd like to be as well if not more well armed. A lot of people have shifted from handguns to rifles for home defense.
The gun is good!
 
What's your script for all the redactions exactly?
grand jury testimony was never going to be unsealed, retard. grand juries exist to guarantee complete anonymity to everyone involved. the child porn they were given, and the testimony given to them, is censored completely. it is only at the request OF THE COURTS DIRECTLY that grand jury testimony can be unsealed in any way, and even then, only if you can prove directly that this testimony is directly relevant to what is being unclassified/uncensored/released. this is actually well-known, and the biden admin would've had to do the same thing. massie and khanna specifically put in the caveat that all sensitive victim and innocent info MUST be censored. you can thank them for legal redactions! the democrat and the never-trumper KNEW already that there was nothing in it that would implicate trump, but still wanted to make sure all those girls (who are all either dead or adults at this point) don't... what, don't get known as victims of trafficking? something they weren't responsible for?

if massie is so pissed about the redactions, why doesn't he make good on his promise to read the documents on the house floor with his immunity from libel and slander prosecution? go ahead, massie. prove you weren't lying to us all when you said you'd do that! prove you weren't just bullshitting us all when you gathered those young ladies up and told them what to say.

also lol at you literally proving me right.
i know you won't respond to me. you literally don't have a single word to say in defense of your argument other than that you really, REALLY want it to be true.
i will reiterate. why didn't the biden administration release the epstein files of their own accord?
 
grand jury testimony was never going to be unsealed, retard. grand juries exist to guarantee complete anonymity to everyone involved. the child porn they were given, and the testimony given to them, is censored completely. it is only at the request OF THE COURTS DIRECTLY that grand jury testimony can be unsealed in any way, and even then, only if you can prove directly that this testimony is directly relevant to what is being unclassified/uncensored/released. this is actually well-known, and the biden admin would've had to do the same thing. massie and khanna specifically put in the caveat that all sensitive victim and innocent info MUST be censored. you can thank them for legal redactions! the democrat and the never-trumper KNEW already that there was nothing in it that would implicate trump, but still wanted to make sure all those girls (who are all either dead or adults at this point) don't... what, don't get known as victims of trafficking? something they weren't responsible for?

if massie is so pissed about the redactions, why doesn't he make good on his promise to read the documents on the house floor with his immunity from libel and slander prosecution? go ahead, massie. prove you weren't lying to us all when you said you'd do that! prove you weren't just bullshitting us all when you gathered those young ladies up and told them what to say.

also lol at you literally proving me right.

i will reiterate. why didn't the biden administration release the epstein files of their own accord?
If your theory is everyone involved already knew the full files would never be released then it sounds as if every person involved in the government is involved in this scheme. Why you are trying to make this a tribal issue is something I don't understand. If you're asking for my opinion then I believe Donald Trump is among those redacted names.
 
Those photos do look pretty shitty, but I’m not pretentious enough to quantify exactly why they’re shitty.
Basically it turns out the people who would do a lot of post-editing of shit for them before publishing decided not to do that. They decided to let all the little imperfections stay in because they are that mad.

In fact, even the photographer wasn’t doing his job to make the pictures come off well. Look at them.
IMG_0493.jpeg IMG_0494.jpeg IMG_0495.jpeg
Staging photos around outlets and light switches is not exactly professional work let alone not having those edited out before publishing it. It shows a lack of respect and and attempt to mock the subjects by making them look like imitation versions of actual federal cabinet members.
 
Última edición:
I just realized there is a whole group of people who have grown up only knowing presidential elections with Trump in them, 3 back to back hard fought campaigns has to be some kind of record, Roosevelt was basically cake walking every one of his elections.

Also twitter is making alot of hay about the vanity fair photoshoot, apparently it was done in a way to deliberately make the Trump admin look bad.

I think they are on some shit you need to have gone to a liberal arts school and spent $100,000 on a nonsense major to understand.
Ver archivo adjunto 8311452

funny skit I have half baked is the brain of a modern day leftist in a 1930s jew in Germany

"We have photographed Hitler next to lighbulb, this will give away his height to the reader and his downfall will surely be close behind"
1766270995353.png
It's over. England has won the battle of Dunkirk now.
 
If your theory is everyone involved already knew the full files would never be released then it sounds as if every person involved in the government is involved in this scheme. Why you are trying to make this a tribal issue is something I don't understand. If you're asking for my opinion then I believe Donald Trump is among those redacted names.
'the files' is not the grand jury testimony which is the supermajority of all redacted files and images. the other redactions are very specifically the FACES of women. and yes, massie and ro khanna both were fully aware that the grand jury transcripts that were going to be released would be censored. massie understands how the grand jury system works, and the law did not have anything including any special provisions for grand jury transcripts, which they knew meant that they would be treated by default as sealed records that the court had not granted permission to unseal.

again, the two people, a democrat and republican never-trumper, who put this bill forward, EXPLICITLY INCLUDED the caveat that censorship was just peachy keen, because muh victims and innocent people. you are making the claim that trump is in the documents, but you have literally no evidence that he is, including a previous, highly hostile administration that was willing to prosecute him for a brand new crime that New York had to extend filing deadlines by decades to even bring. you are literally coming at this from the place that you already believed trump's name was there, so any censorship, any redactions, any pages you can't read yourself, would always have been red flags for you. you are working backwards from a conclusion, not drawing a conclusion from the presented evidence, which is why you also literally cannot answer this one simple question.

i know you won't respond to me. you literally don't have a single word to say in defense of your argument other than that you really, REALLY want it to be true.
respond to this, faggot. respond to the fact that you don't have any actual evidence that trump is there, at all. explain to us how the previous, highly adversarial administration, which was KNOWN FOR LEAKING SO MUCH AS SUPREME COURT OPINIONS, EARLY, would not have found a way to leak at least a picture of trump involved with epstein somewhere past the 90s and early 2000s that he's been very up front they knew each other as acquaintances during.

the biden administration had 4 years straight to release this documentation unredacted, and chose not to. massie's petition was only a petition to make congress pass a law FORCING this, biden's DOJ could've done this at any time.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo