US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Antifa has been labeled as a terrorist org. These things take time. By the end of these 4 years I think the countries going to look alot better than the end of Bidens term.
That's all that's going to matter and we'll make electing Vance much easier. How do you argue with "Hey, isn't shit WAY better than it was during the Biden administration? Keep voting for us and it will stay that way."
 
I’m going to be honest, here

My life and especially my politics were never in any way affected by Charlie Kirk. I just tended to like him because he was effective and I mostly agreed with him
I think it's just the fact he was shot for speaking is what has hurt a lot of people. Now you have this power vacuum with people like Nick the Spic trying to take Charlie's spot. It's a long term issue, even if it didn't affect (you) personally at the moment.
 
I think it's just the fact he was shot for speaking is what has hurt a lot of people. Now you have this power vacuum with people like Nick the Spic trying to take Charlie's spot. It's a long term issue, even if it didn't affect (you) personally at the moment.
Honestly like I said a couple months ago, Nick is here to disrupt the Right and then run away from any consequences
 
Now you have this power vacuum with people like Nick the Spic trying to take Charlie's spot.
Dodged a prison sentence because he's a rat, dodged a bullet because he only streams from his mom's house instead of saying his crazy shit to people's faces, and he is far more deserving of each than the illegally confined protestors or Charlie Kirk.
 
I think it's just the fact he was shot for speaking is what has hurt a lot of people.
From my own experience, this is where most (normal) people stop, even if they disagree with his points. Like the people who I have spoken to say he should have ended up in jail/sued into the ground for some of his remarks but, even then, he shouldn't have been shot.
 
I FUCKING love when my elected politicians post about problems online instead of drafting and voting for legislation and making executive actions to actually fix these problems. Republicans have become nothing more than glorified shitposters and it would be nice if they backed up any of their talk with even the slightest bit of action. Who gives a flying fuck if we're "winning the argument" or "owning the libtards" when those libtards are still raping the country dry completely unopposed.
Why are there so many groypers posting here these days? Shut the fuck up.
 
You don’t have to use their moral framing to justify your actions.
No, but it's okay to use the enemy's hypocrisy to undermine their justifications.

They will never accept your worldview, nor will they accept an argument that's predicated on it.

What is left? Show them first that their own beliefs are contradictory and chosen as a result of groupthink, and inconsistent with reality.

Certainly there are some who are immune to any kind of rational argument, but if you are arguing with them you have already made a mistake, regardless of how you argue.
 
Who's his Enkidu
That's Shinzo.
Honestly like I said a couple months ago, Nick is here to disrupt the Right and then run away from any consequences
Well yes, obviously.
Dodged a prison sentence because he's a rat, dodged a bullet because he only streams from his mom's house instead of saying his crazy shit to people's faces, and he is far more deserving of each than the illegally confined protestors or Charlie Kirk.
Nick is a coward, a gay man, a fed, and thats why he's a weak ass at the end of the day. He has no backbone. Charlie did.
From my own experience, this is where most (normal) people stop, even if they disagree with his points. Like the people who I have spoken to say he should have ended up in jail/sued into the ground for some of his remarks but, even then, he shouldn't have been shot.
Charlie in jail? What?
 
I think it's just the fact he was shot for speaking is what has hurt a lot of people. Now you have this power vacuum with people like Nick the Spic trying to take Charlie's spot. It's a long term issue, even if it didn't affect (you) personally at the moment.
The problem is that everyone vying for Charlie's spot is a much lesser person than him. Cat boy faggot and nigger girl Hitler are such obvious downgrades that even saying that they are the new Charlie Kirk is an insult to his memory and legacy.
 
This is retarded, you see this all the time at division level staff and higher. There's lots of light colonels rolling around on staffs.
You'll have to forgive him. He's used to the IDF.
this is one of the most annoying, infuriating fucking things about liberals, and 'leftists' who think they're not liberals. they will point at an example of a minority behaving themselves, and extrapolate that out to the entire minority, for no reason other than toxic empathy.

"oh well i once knew a nice black guy, so they all must be nice." and then they get shot.

"oh well i once knew a nice mexican so they all must be nice." and then they get in a drunk driving accident with an illegal.

or in a debate, it's "you can't use anecdotal evidence of bad behavior from blacks, i have anecdotal evidence of good behavior of blacks." and the magnitude of these two anecdotes or how many anecdotes there are is simply not analogous at all.
Humans are hardwired to trust anecdotal evidence over other kinds of evidence, likely because it's the closest match to episodic memory, which is all you get without reasoning or language.

The flip side is that simply by telling someone evidence in the form of a story, you can borrow that bias and use it in your favor.

The takeaway is to quote headlines about individual crimes, not FBI crime statistics.
 
The problem is that everyone vying for Charlie's spot is a much lesser person than him. Cat boy faggot and nigger girl Hitler are such obvious downgrades that even saying that they are the new Charlie Kirk is an insult to his memory and legacy.
They don't want to continue where Charlie left off. They want to enforce their own ideology. It's why it feels so off. These niggers broke Sektur containment and are bleeding into the normie sphere.
 
I think it's just the fact he was shot for speaking is what has hurt a lot of people. Now you have this power vacuum with people like Nick the Spic trying to take Charlie's spot. It's a long term issue, even if it didn't affect (you) personally at the moment.
Right, so there’s more personal affect from how Charlie was killed than from Charlie dying, because HOW is the part that contains implications that affect us

Every time a celebrity dies and the entire internet starts weeping tears of grift, I’m transported back to seventh grade when Kurt Cobain killed himself and half of the girls in my grade spent the entire day crying
 
Right, so there’s more personal affect from how Charlie was killed than from Charlie dying, because HOW is the part that contains implications that affect us

Every time a celebrity dies and the entire internet starts weeping tears of grift, I’m transported back to seventh grade when Kurt Cobain killed himself and half of the girls in my grade spent the entire day crying
Well yes. An assassination is not indicative of a healthy society.
 
Well yes. An assassination is not indicative of a healthy society.
It’s taking too much credit to phrase it as high mindedly as that.

They killed someone like us. Maybe not exactly like us, but someone who thinks 80% or more the way we think, and they killed him for thinking that way.

It was a declaration of war, and a threat that feels personal
 
Atrás
Top Abajo