Google unveils plans to try again with smart glasses in 2026

Link: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyx83n00k6o
Credit: Liv McMahon BBC Technology reporter
Archive: https://archive.ph/mkUf1

56.webp

Google plans to launch smart glasses powered by artificial intelligence (AI) in 2026, after its previous high-profile attempt to enter the market ended in failure.

The tech giant set expectations high in 2013 when it unveiled Google Glass, billed by some as the future of technology despite its odd appearance with a bulky screen positioned above the right eye.

Google pulled the product in 2015 less than seven months after its UK release, but is now planning on re-entering the market with smart glasses with a cleaner look.

But it comes after Meta has already made waves with its smart specs, which have sold two million pairs as of February.

Google's new tech will let users interact with its own AI products, such as its chatbot Gemini.

It plans to launch two different varieties - one designed to be provide assistance without any kind of screen, and another which has a display on the glasses themselves.

While saying the first of the two types of AI glasses it is working on would come in 2026, Google has not given more information on what form it will take.

Technology analyst Paolo Pescatore told the BBC the tech firm "must avoid the pitfalls of its previous failed attempt".

"Arguably, the move was ahead of its time, poorly conceived and executed," he said.

"Now represents an opportune moment, thanks to the success of Gemini."

78.webp

Google co-founder Sergey Brin demonstrated Google Glass on-stage at an event in 2012.


Google will also have to contend with Meta, which unveiled its own AI-powered glasses earlier this year, having built on its existing collaborations with luxury eyewear brands Ray-Ban and Oakley.

According to market research firm Counterpoint Research, the sector saw a surge in the first half of 2025, driven by demand for Meta's devices and the launch of similar products by smaller brands.

It said sales of AI glasses had grown by more than 250% compared to the previous year.

What went wrong with Google Glass?
Google Glass was launched in 2013 as a pair of thin, wireframe glasses with a chunky right arm to accommodate a camera built into the corner of the right lens.

Wearers could use the camera to take images and record their surroundings, while simultaneously interact with a digital display

The device created a lot of excitement when it first appeared at a Google event in June 2012.

But after its launch the following year, concerns about its impact on privacy, potential for abuse and questions about its style and usefulness arose - and grew until Google Google said it would stop making them in that form in 2015.

A revamped version, Google Glass Enterprise, appeared two years later but was retired in 2023.

Former BBC Technology Correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones was among those who had deemed Google's device in its initial form to be "a failure".

The success of so-called wearable computers, he wrote, would likely depend on having the tech to bring their potential to life and them being "both attractive to wear and so easy to use that you forget that you have them on".

Today, tech giants have tried to make AI and smart glasses more wearable by partnering with designer eyewear brands - and can pack more power and features into smaller, sleeker frames.

But there remain concerns about privacy and usability.
 
Give me a non-pervert reason for this to be useful.

Like I know everyone wants to be RoboCop or the Terminator, but I don't want cops who are distracted by the blinky-blinky to be responsible for life and limb of either civilians or their fellow officers.
 
Give me a non-pervert reason for this to be useful.
I can foresee a lot of accidents with glasses like these. Mobile phones are bad enough, just imagine somebody fixated on what they're seeing in their glasses and stepping out into traffic or worse, driving through it.
 
Did you know Google just signed a contract with the Department of Defense to make Gemini available for all military and "national security" purposes? "Do no evil" LMAO

 
So they are gonna try again, but this time they will also bundle the ChatBot that infamously made black lesbian nazis when asked to generate historical images and which consistently tells people basic math is wrong and to put glue in pizza to make the cheese stretchy.

That top human capital from Hyderabad doing wonders I see.
 
No one is using this, but I think that transparent screens are cooler than the VR headsets that Apple and Oculus are using. If they aren't rare to the point that they become a collectors item, than they will be fun to play with in 10 years after they become cheap and lose all practical value.
I wonder if Microsoft will make a copilot powered Hololens 3.
 
Oakley made a Bluetooth set of glasses for a while. The concept isn't that wild, I would probably go for something like it if not for all the strings attached.
 
Another article about it, via CNN.

I tried Google’s prototype smart glasses and it almost made me forget about my phone​

by Lisa Eadicicco
avif.png
CNN's Tech Editor Lisa Eadicicco trying out Google's latest smart glasses prototype.
How often do you reach for your phone to get directions, answer a video call or Google something? Probably more times than you can count.

Google wants to change that, and it’s not alone. The search giant is part of a growing cohort of tech companies betting big on smart glasses that use artificial intelligence to relay information from your phone and analyze your surroundings using cameras and microphones.
Google demonstrated its glasses in May and introduced the software behind them a year ago. But last week it showed CNN and other outlets a more detailed look at the software, providing a better glimpse into what to expect when the glasses launch next year. It could be a step toward a world where people are no longer grabbing their phones every few seconds.

If the glasses are successful, that is. Google Glass, the company’s previous attempt at smart glasses, flopped roughly a decade ago because they were unstylish, expensive, limited in functionality and brought up a wave of privacy concerns.

Google relies mostly on search, advertising and cloud services for its revenue, so hardware products like smart glasses are not going to make or break the nearly $4 trillion tech juggernaut. But the stakes are still high for smart glasses, with tech giants eager to plant their flag in what they see as the next wave of personal computers.

“If you look at the way that Google and many companies in our industry have grown, it’s always about expanding with new computing platforms,” said Juston Payne, Google’s director of product management for Android XR, the software platform that powers Google’s glasses.
“We see the same thing happening in this space,” he added.

Google already faces stiff competition, as Meta has touted strong sales of its Ray-Ban glasses, saying on an October earnings call that its newest model “sold out in almost every store within 48 hours.” Tech companies, including Google, have tried and failed to make VR headsets and glasses an everyday product.

Glasses that can see – and alter – the world around you​

Similar to Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses, Google’s spectacles let you do a variety of things hands-free, such as taking a photo, getting directions, answering calls and learning about the objects in your viewpoint. In this demo and previous ones, I’ve asked Gemini questions like: “Do I need to read the other books in this series?” or “Are these peppers spicy” when glancing at a shelf of books or grocery items.

Google has made some notable changes since the last time I tried its prototype roughly a year ago. After taking a picture of the room I was in, Google instantly transformed the photo to make it look like the North Pole using its Nano Banana AI model. All it took was a simple spoken command.
I was impressed but also a little concerned about how glasses like these so quickly and easily capture and doctor images.

Google went down this twisty road over a decade ago, when its failed Google Glass headset sparked controversy for how it could discretely take photos and record video.

Payne says Google has learned from what happened with Glasses. Similar to Meta’s Ray-Bans, there’s a light on the prototype glasses that shows when the camera or AI image editing model is in use, and Gemini users can delete prompts and activity in the app.
“Our belief here is that glasses can fail based on a lack of social acceptance. So, in other words, we have to be fully leaned in” to privacy, said Payne. Google Glass, however, faced other hurdles.

Better than your phone at some things, but not a replacement​

Instead of peering down at your phone at every corner to find your way around a new city, or glancing down to see translations during a conversation with a foreign language speaker, glasses like Google’s can show and recite information right near your line of sight and in your ear.
The version of Google Maps I tried on the glasses shows an arrow pointing you in the right direction near your sightline and the map when you glance down. It’s similar in functionality to the way Google Maps works on phones, but without the hassle looking down at a screen.

But prepare for some awkward interactions. I spoke before Gemini was ready to listen and interrupted Gemini’s responses on multiple occasions, for example. Those social nuances are only part of the reason why phones probably aren’t going away anytime soon, and why Payne acknowledges that glasses won’t replace phones.
But Google is willing to bet that glasses will play some role in whatever the next big computing device will be – so much so that the glasses are even compatible with Android’s biggest rival, the iPhone.


Google plans to sell the glasses in two versions: one with a display and another that just provides audio feedback. Google is partnering with eyeglass makers Warby Parker and Gentle Monster and hasn’t said when they will launch or how much they will cost. It’s also developing another model with two screens that can show more in-depth graphics, but the company hasn’t said exactly when those will launch.

It’s not just Google’s future that’s riding on the success of Android XR and Gemini. Just like Android for phones, Android XR is available to other tech companies so that they can make headsets and glasses fueled by the software. Samsung and Xreal, a company that specializes in smart glasses, are among Google’s first partners.

When asked what happens to Xreal if the AI boom turns out to be just hype, founder and CEO Chi Xu said he believes “AI is for real.”
 
Give me a non-pervert reason for this to be useful.

Like I know everyone wants to be RoboCop or the Terminator, but I don't want cops who are distracted by the blinky-blinky to be responsible for life and limb of either civilians or their fellow officers.
Just off the top of my head: Tourism. Just look at a QR code in a museum, next to an artpiece, and get information as exhaustive or concise as you want.

Really, the possibilities are vast, it will just be clunky to use with a primarily audio control-interface.
 
Give me a non-pervert reason for this to be useful.

Like I know everyone wants to be RoboCop or the Terminator, but I don't want cops who are distracted by the blinky-blinky to be responsible for life and limb of either civilians or their fellow officers.
Full FOV glasses that project a large virtual display could be good. It already exists though, and a wired connection is ok most of the time, letting the device be cheaper and more lightweight:


Anything related to photo/videography could be better with glasses. If you can cut the time to start recording by a few seconds, you can capture the next viral WorldStar video, or a transient UFO sighting.

(For upskirt creepshots, a camera in your shoe would work better than a Glasshole camera.)

Overlay of map directions could be neat.

Or maybe you want to live in this utopia:

 
Just off the top of my head: Tourism. Just look at a QR code in a museum, next to an artpiece, and get information as exhaustive or concise as you want.

Really, the possibilities are vast, it will just be clunky to use with a primarily audio control-interface.
Not to yuck your yum, but gross.

If I went to the Louvre and everyone was standing there like a pants-shitting retard staring into space and reading about expressionism instead of looking at the fucking painting, I would be salty about it.

Look at the art and buy the accompanying book, then read it in your own time.

Meanwhile, get the fuck out of my way.

Don't waste my time.

You know this is going to be used by jeets to turn the world into their own spectacle (as it were) of bobs and vagene.

 
Full FOV glasses that project a large virtual display could be good. It already exists though, and a wired connection is ok most of the time, letting the device be cheaper and more lightweight:
Full FOV always connected glow nigger spyware device on your face that feeds the behavior of everyone you witness into Palantir's Minority Report database so they can be tagged for potential wrongthink! It's worth it though you can watch porn and chat with your ERP bots in public!
 
Full FOV always connected glow nigger spyware device on your face that feeds the behavior of everyone you witness into Palantir's Minority Report database so they can be tagged for potential wrongthink! It's worth it though you can watch porn and chat with your ERP bots in public!
Stop being autistic and praise the Antichrist already, and you too can enjoy overpriced tech gizmos.
 
I tried Google’s prototype smart glasses and it almost made me forget about my phone
I go fishing if I want to forget about using my phone.

Spent over $100 at Cabela's this weekend, as if I need more frigging Rapalas or braided line. Got some snazzy "midnight blue" senkos though.
 
But it comes after Meta has already made waves with its smart specs, which have sold two million pairs as of February.
Did they really sell two million pairs? Or are they just being like Nvidia and angel investing a bunch of SPVs who "buy" them in bulk with some nebulous plan to rent them out later? Because I've never seen not even one pair of these out in the world.

If I went to the Louvre and everyone was standing there like a pants-shitting retard staring into space and reading about expressionism instead of looking at the fucking painting, I would be salty about it.
It'd be like those giant groups of chinese tourists all with VOX earpieces who are always shitting up every european art museum.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo