US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I think its funny most of the pro-maga twitter accounts got outed as jeets.
It's interesting that they went that route for clout rather than the "I'm brown uwu" lefty angle. Not sure which is better for them long term, if I'm having to play out the hypothetical paths. Maybe the right is just easier to grift because there are less rules for the hypothetical grifter to follow?
 
That was the hardest I've ever heard my girlfriend laugh about an idea involving the police. Yeah just send a 120 pound unarmed caseworker into a middle of a domestic violence call.

These types of proposals are about redirecting government funds into the pockets of political cronies. The funding for the social worker response department is redirected from the police budget. The crony put in charge of it then hires their friends and dumps money into contracts awarded to their associates. To keep things looking legit, they'll hire some do-gooders or hard up minimum wage suckers to go on calls. They don't care what happens to these losers and they'll lawfare and smear anyone who calls them out on it.

A lot of state and local government programs are like this. Homeless programs, WorkSource (privatized unemployment), Community Services, and many others.
 
It's interesting that they went that route for clout rather than the "I'm brown uwu" lefty angle. Not sure which is better for them long term, if I'm having to play out the hypothetical paths. Maybe the right is just easier to grift because there are less rules for the hypothetical grifter to follow?
You have not read up on the Indian concept of Izzatt yet.
 
It's interesting that they went that route for clout rather than the "I'm brown uwu" lefty angle. Not sure which is better for them long term, if I'm having to play out the hypothetical paths. Maybe the right is just easier to grift because there are less rules for the hypothetical grifter to follow?
The right is easier to grift.
 
These types of proposals are about redirecting government funds into the pockets of political cronies. The funding for the social worker response department is redirected from the police budget. The crony put in charge of it then hires their friends and dumps money into contracts awarded to their associates. To keep things looking legit, they'll hire some do-gooders or hard up minimum wage suckers to go on calls. They don't care what happens to these losers and they'll lawfare and smear anyone who calls them out on it.

A lot of state and local government programs are like this. Homeless programs, WorkSource (privatized unemployment), Community Services, and many others.
The fact that these people are going to take an ass beating by some nigger on PCP makes it even more sad knowing that they're doing it for next to nothing.
 
You have not read up on the Indian concept of Izzatt yet.
I haaaaave, but technically I could see a path for both directions for the pro izzatt-pilled izzatt-maxxing izzatt-cel.


The right is easier to grift.
Yeah, probably right. I think the joke there was that all you needed to grift the right was add an American flag to your marketing, while left needed land acknowledgment and all this hyper specific shit.

Well yeah, you can't grift people who don't have jobs.
Wrong, they can easily go into debt for furry inflation commissions and shit, so you just gotta grift correctly
 
I haaaaave, but technically I could see a path for both directions for the pro izatt-pilled izatt-maxxing izatt-cel.
I see it as pro. It is righteous to WIN (make money) under izatt, no matter how underhanded it is. Grifting schmucks, as long as they never catch you, gets you tons of that social currency. You now are rich in your village too, so there's that as well.
 
I see it as pro. It is righteous to WIN (make money) under izatt, no matter how underhanded it is. Grifting schmucks, as long as they never catch you, gets you tons of that social currency. You now are rich in your village too, so there's that as well.
This feels like the philosophy of a retarded gnome in a Shin Megami Tensei game that has his tiny dick flopping out of his gnome shorts 24/7, throwing leaves at niggas.
 
This feels like the philosophy of a retarded gnome in a Shin Megami Tensei game that has his tiny dick flopping out of his gnome shorts 24/7, throwing leaves at niggas.
Don't take my word for it. It's even more retarded than I'm giving it credit for.
 
That's the best part about that retarded liberal idea: they don't know either. Every time I've ever pressed a "defund police add social workers" position, I've asked what social workers -- as first responders -- are supposed to do about obviously and plainly violent suspects. I've never heard an actual answer to that question. Usually it gets handwaved. Occasionally straight denial: "oh that never happens." One admitted it'd be best to have police and social workers both dispatched for first contact and decide in situ who "goes first."
Whenever I push them, like REALLY push them they basically describe something that's basically just cops.

Come to think of it this happens when i ask them what should replace money, credit systems, military, basically anything. Leftists are just conservatives who think they're too smart to be conservatives.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo