US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
her qatar ties worry me more than anything else.
Wiles is probably the least concerning of the Qatar tied officials in the Trump admin, she herself never worked for Qatar. Bondi and Kash worked for the Qatar lobby while Witkoff and Kushner have significant financial interests in Qatar. They also directly negotiated with Hamas which is sponsored by Qatar.

Qatar has been spending a ton on lobbying and it's been paying off for them. Bob Menendez took bribes from Qatar to boost them. It's all part of the the game.
 
Wiles is probably the least concerning of the Qatar tied officials in the Trump admin, she herself never worked for Qatar.
The firm she worked for mercury public affairs (after she left ballard, ballard was where bondi and another high rankign trump person, i can't remember who) did some lobbying for qatar (and india)

The way all these lobbyist firms are all in bed with each other is distasteful as all hell.
 
he's the only "historian" podcaster that gets so much wrong that someone was able to create a podcast simply correcting his many errors
Would love to know what that podcast is. I thought Darryl Cooper did some great narrative structuring of Israel and Palestine as well as Jim Jones. Since he’s gone completely Paleoconservative, I’d like to know what biased material he may have put in those episodes.
 
Sorry for vagueposting but I need your guys’s advice. Suppose you have a major opportunity coming up relatively shortly in which you can network with certain people in the admin. The opportunity isn’t necessarily policy-focused, but it’s the only one you’ll get. What arguments would you present to try to convince them to curtail legal immigration (H1Bs, etc)?
I would look for ways to present this positively, as an opportunity.

"You would really connect with Gen-Z voters if you showed leadership on this issue, and here's how."​
"In my political discussion group, the younger voters are paying a lot of attention immigration issues."​

If you're meeting with politicians or those around them, they tend to be more responsive to political influence than logical or practical arguments. For example,

- Show that you represent or speak for a group of people, especially IRL.​
- Show how the issue affects the politician and how they can politically benefit​
- Demonstrate that you have other types of influence that the politician cares about such as financial, media reach, connections, professional, etc​
- In some contexts, demonstrating policy expertise can be helpful​

Policy wonks are a different animal entirely. They are kind of like autists, but instead of trains it's formalized opinions about a narrow subject and its related laws and regulations. It’s hard to have a discussion about their special subject unless you're really knowledgeable about it. They do like giving lectures though. Showing some interest and letting them talk can maybe get your foot in the door for further discussion.

Good luck.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo