🤡 Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

[gollumm]

Did she submit a response? Or try to? Doesn't seem like it from the docket.

It just dropped: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69650487/177/doe-v-bonnell/

Based queen waiting until the very last few hours
Edit:

Spoiler: ChatGPT Summary

Case Update: Jane Doe v. Steven K. Bonnell II (Destiny) — Plaintiff Responds to Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order​

Filing: Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
Case No.: 1:25-cv-20757-JB/Torres
Date Filed: November 2025
Full Document: Link to PDF

---

Background​

• The Defendant (Bonnell/Destiny) filed a Motion for Protective Order asking the court to block or reschedule certain depositions.
• The Plaintiff (Jane Doe) just filed her response, arguing that the Defendant is misrepresenting the situation and that his request should be denied.

---

The Dispute​

The issue is mainly about scheduling depositions — when and how both parties and witnesses will be questioned under oath.

• Plaintiff’s counsel says they repeatedly offered reasonable dates for everyone’s depositions.
• Plaintiff (a student living in Illinois) couldn’t attend an in-person deposition in Miami in October, so she suggested:
  • Remote options, or
  • In-person dates around Thanksgiving (Nov 21, 24, 25) to avoid missing class and minimize travel costs.
• Defendant’s counsel insisted on early November, then unilaterally noticed her deposition for Nov 3, even though she’d said she wasn’t available.
• Plaintiff’s team had already confirmed Defendant’s own deposition for Nov 6, but on the eve of it, Defendant’s side refused to appear unless Plaintiff first showed up on Nov 3.

---

Plaintiff’s Argument​

• No good cause for a protective order under Rule 26(c).
• Discovery abuse: Defendant’s side ignored agreed-upon scheduling, imposed one-sided conditions, and demanded depositions be back-to-back purely for convenience.
• Plaintiff says she’s acted in good faith and shouldn’t be sanctioned — she’s just trying to get the depositions done within the existing deadlines.

---

Plaintiff’s Proposed Schedule​

Plaintiff offers new dates to finish discovery by the Dec 16 deadline:

Event	Proposed Date	Location
Plaintiff’s Deposition	Nov 24 or 25	Miami
Non-party witness (TX)	Dec 3	Remote
Non-party witness (DC)	Dec 8	Remote
Defendant’s Deposition	Dec 10 or 11	Miami
Plaintiff’s Expert	Dec 16	Miami
Mediation	Dec 17 or 19	Miami

---

What Plaintiff Wants the Court to Do​

• Deny Defendant’s motion for protective order
• Reject Defendant’s request for sanctions
• Order the parties to set reasonable, mutually agreed dates for depositions

---

TL;DR​

Plaintiff says Defendant’s motion is based on a false narrative — that he’s the one refusing to cooperate. She argues she’s offered multiple reasonable dates, while his team is using scheduling tactics to delay discovery and pressure her. She asks the court to deny his motion and let the depositions proceed fairly.

 

[cmzng]

Dec 3rd is Abby’s proposed deposition I assume, but interesting pxie is fine going first (around thanksgiving) and proposing Steven’s deposition 1 or 2 days from his birthday (Dec10-11). That will be an interesting follow up stream if it happens that way.

Not giving Destiny much excuse to flail around and delay things with that proposal.

 

[Gunter x Gunter]

Am I mishearing this? Did he say "I'm getting raped every single day"?

raped.webm

Lmao, if the Graped One refers to himself as a raped little bitch constantly, it really not that morally repugnant and he is right, he gets rekted constantly.

 

[Pippa is a spic whore]

With the Epstein LAWGZ dropping I have noticed a lack of known dgjeets both in dgg and on the site defending orange man's honor against these UNHINGED accusadions of noncery. Sure he may have ravaged a 17yro but as we have been told countless times thats not an excuse to use the p word. Right? RIGHT??

 

[GarlicFragment]

It just dropped: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69650487/177/doe-v-bonnell/

Sounds like they deposed Rose on October 23!

That was about when Destiny started the vagueposting:

Needless to say in here, but Destiny is hardly a trustworthy barometer. He unashamedly lies and has an embarrassingly low batting average regarding this case.

Based on them pointing out that the "non-party witness is not represented by Plaintiff's counsel," I'm guessing the witness in Texas is AbbyMC. Who could the Washington, DC witness be? Note that both are by Destiny.

Yes, "Magistrate Judge Torres" is our very own unhinged cabal member, Eddy! Referring to a judge's previous ruling has got to get you some bonus points?

Andy B. being sneaky?:

Basically, the whole reasoning for unilaterally deciding on the November 3 date for Pxie's deposition might not have been valid, because i) Brettler would be traveling to Miami the week of November 6 (Destiny's deposition date) regardless, ii) Apparently the strain of traveling twice wasn't a big deal because the defense tried to schedule Pxie's deposition for October, after Destiny's was already set for November 6. From Defendant's motion:

It sounds like Andy B. was available on November 24-25, when Pxie was available for her deposition:

The defense were the ones who suggested the November 6 date for Destiny's deposition:

If it is correct that Andy B. was available the same dates as Pxie was, and their reasoning for pairing the depositions (how much consideration should be given to the distinct needs of far-away counsel anyway?) was spurious, it seems like they would've had pretty good arguments if they'd just filed a motion for a protective order themselves. So why didn't they, and risk getting stuck with one of the many $10k bills to Andy B.?

 

[Bert killed Ernie. Why?]

Hasan urgently needs a chastity cage, Destiny is going to crawl into his house like Gollum

Sorry @gollumm sometimes there will be a little friendly fire in the crusade to bring attention to the possibility that Destiny just hates Hasan because Hasan wouldn't let him suck on his toes that night he got drunk, felt Hasan up, and got hard rejected.



People should never let Destiny live down his jilted lover routine.

 

[Universal Balance]

With the Epstein LAWGZ dropping I have noticed a lack of known dgjeets both in dgg and on the site defending orange man's honor against these UNHINGED accusadions of noncery. Sure he may have ravaged a 17yro but as we have been told countless times thats not an excuse to use the p word. Right? RIGHT??

Virginia was 17 and 345 days bro, Trump did not do nuttin saar.

Isn't that the stance?

I'm all for calling Trump a fucking pedo but only if I get to call Steven one.

That's what I heard. It's weird that he'd say that about something as mundane as court machinations since he's a victim of CSA. Everyone I know who was CSAd doesn't like the topic of rape, at ALL.

Just another reason to suggest that he is lying about his brutal backstory to make himself more interesting and to give the appearance of a well meaning, tortured soul.

 

[Samson Hydemanfinkelstein]

Yeah but the thing is, it doesn't really FEEL like Destiny, you know? This is the layout I see Destiny living in.

Ver archivo adjunto 8160782

How could 'Tiny live in a house that he'd constantly be trying to film himself sucking on?

 

[dezazlop]

Am I mishearing this? Did he say "I'm getting raped every single day"?

What does he mean raped? I thought he gave implicit consent for Andy Boy to fuck his wallet

 

[GarlicFragment]

Destiny has filed their sur-reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

Reply in Support of Motion

Spoiler: ChatGPT summary

• Purpose of filing
  • Defendant Bonnell submits an authorized sur-reply to support his Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, addressing corrections made to Plaintiff’s expert Jesús F. Peña’s declaration.
• Core jurisdictional point (timing of transmission)
  • Peña’s amended declaration now expressly states Bonnell’s Discord transmission of the video to “Rose” occurred on April 9, 2022.
  • This is nearly six months before CARDII’s October 1, 2022 effective date, so Bonnell’s alleged “transmission” cannot fall under the statute.
  • The new date is consistent with other record evidence and with Plaintiff’s prior admission that she could not conclusively determine the transmission occurred after October 1, 2022.
• Retraction of spoliation/evidence-tampering accusations
  • In his original declaration, Peña claimed Bonnell’s Discord export was “tampered with,” that messages were deleted/altered, and that the chat log was unreliable.
  • In the amended declaration, Peña withdraws those accusations, acknowledging that the supposed inconsistencies are explained by Discord’s time-grouping interface and not by any manipulation.
  • Plaintiff concedes that the portions of her Opposition relying on those now-withdrawn tampering claims “are no longer supported” and should be disregarded.
  • Defendant reiterates that the Discord export is accurate and shows the lone transmission occurred in April 2022.
• Attack on reliability of Peña’s expert testimony
  • Defendant argues Peña’s misunderstanding of Discord’s basic interface shows he did no real forensic analysis and lacks the expertise he claims.
  • Even after retracting tampering accusations, Peña only speculates that the export is “unreliable” without a cryptographic hash, but identifies no actual alteration, loss, or destruction of data.
  • Defendant characterizes this as rhetorical speculation designed to manufacture ambiguity, not legitimate forensic opinion.
• Plaintiff’s discovery posture
  • Defendant notes that Plaintiff’s call for “further discovery” on jurisdiction is undermined by her failure to appear for her noticed deposition on November 3, 2025 (referencing Bonnell’s motion for protective order).
• Framing of the legal issue
  • Defendant asserts the only dispositive question for federal subject-matter jurisdiction is when Bonnell transmitted the video.
  • That date is clear from the Discord log and now from Plaintiff’s own expert’s admission; no specialized expertise is needed to read a timestamp.
  • Defendant argues Plaintiff’s “continuous disclosure” theory is an unsupported attempt to evade the clear pre-CARDII timing.
• Requested relief
  • Defendant asks the Court to grant the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, as the alleged transmission predated CARDII’s effective date and the expert evidence no longer supports Plaintiff’s contrary position.

IMPORTANT:

So I guess we know what the supposed bombshell was. Rose was supposedly Solo, at least according to the "non-party deponent" who we also know as Attali.

 

[Pentamidine]

Destiny has filed their sur-reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

Reply in Support of Motion

IMPORTANT:
Ver archivo adjunto 8163895
So I guess we know what the supposed bombshell was. Rose was supposedly Solo, at least according to the "non-party deponent" who we also know as Attali.

That's not relevant to the case in any way. Destiny's going to try to spin this as getting honeypotted but that is also not relevant to the allegations against him in any way. It also flies in the face of him having had phone conversations with her, unless he now thinks Solo was using a voice changer and was actually the person on the phone.

"Mr. Bonnelli - you were sexting and exchanging porn of others without their consent to a 17 year old girl."
"It was actually someone PRETENDING to be a 17 year old girl"

This doesn't absolve him of anything. Even if Solo orchestrated the whole thing to get dirt on Destiny to blackmail him with or something like that, nothing is changed from the perspective of Destiny during the episode.

Imagine if someone got caught on To Catch a Predator and when they found out they were actually talking to an adult (while thinking they were talking to a child) they thought that absolved them.

The only people more retarded than Destiny is his audience, who will eat this up btw.

 

[gollumm]

That's not relevant to the case in any way. Destiny's going to try to spin this as getting honeypotted but that is also not relevant to the allegations against him in any way. It also flies in the face of him having had phone conversations with her, unless he now thinks Solo was using a voice changer and was actually the person on the phone.

"Mr. Bonnelli - you were sexting and exchanging porn of others without their consent to a 17 year old girl."
"It was actually someone PRETENDING to be a 17 year old girl"

This doesn't absolve him of anything. Even if Solo orchestrated the whole thing to get dirt on Destiny to blackmail him with or something like that, nothing is changed from the perspective of Destiny during the episode.

Imagine if someone got caught on To Catch a Predator and when they found out they were actually talking to an adult (while thinking they were talking to a child) they thought that absolved them.

The only people more retarded than Destiny is his audience, who will eat this up btw.

ARE WE JUST IGNORING THAT SHE HAS A PICTURE IN HIS MERCH? THIS IS JUST BLATANT SANDWORM BULLSHIT.

OF COURSE THIS IS THE STORY THEY GO WITH, IT ABSOLVED HER OF GUILT OF BEING AN ONLINE WHORE AND DESTINY CAN USE IT AS SOME RETARD-TIER DEFLECTION AGAINST THE PEDO ACCUSATIONS.

 

[kendoubleyou]

Yep, this is nonsense considering he sent her merch, she received it, she wore it and took a picture of it, and he received the photo.

Also yeah you got "catfished" by someone you thought could be a minor (him avoiding getting her ID in their initial twitter DMs), and still received her csam lol. Nice cope. Oooh also, didn't she send some sort of verification in those twitter messages so he could confirm she was a real person and not a catfish? Lol.

And this aligns with the idea that after she was discovered, he contacted her and paid her off. Since the catfishing story is pretty nonsensical with all the available information we have.

Oh and the multiple photos she took of her whereabouts (the rockford community college photo for instance). How could a catfish acquire those pictures unless she was in the loop/provided them?

Though I don't think pxie will dig into this since it's irrelevant to the case.

He said he called her, but that was just a lie to pxie to pretend he trusted her to not leak stuff right? He also mentioned being on video calls with her and the "boyfriend" correct? Where they would film porn? Also goes back to the story Blav talks about where they (her and Solo?) are watching fuentes together.

FUCK if only I wasn't so lazy I would dig through all this, this narrative not only can be blown apart but this can end up being even worse than anything else if foul play is discovered and they're working together to lie about it.

Very exciting stuff! I don't think this retard knew what he was getting into trying to go with the catfish narrative.

 

[BasedCunt]

ARE WE JUST IGNORING THAT SHE HAS A PICTURE IN HIS MERCH? THIS IS JUST BLATANT SANDWORM BULLSHIT.

OF COURSE THIS IS THE STORY THEY GO WITH, IT ABSOLVED HER OF GUILT OF BEING AN ONLINE WHORE AND DESTINY CAN USE IT AS SOME RETARD-TIER DEFLECTION AGAINST THE PEDO ACCUSATIONS.

I was just about to say this. How fucking retarded can you be when one of the images you sent to get us to dox her was a photo of her wearing your merch, with no pants on at that!

Be so fucking fr

 

[Pentamidine]

Yep, this is nonsense considering he sent her merch, she received it, she wore it and took a picture of it, and he received it.

It could be totally true. It's what they do on OnlyFans - the w*man makes the content but an Indian does all the DMing with subscribers. It doesn't make sense since Destiny claims he wasn't buying the CSAM, but was merely getting it for free, so I don't understand what anybody's motivations are supposed to be here.

However, when the story originally broke Destiny made it a point to say that when Solo talked to him on that Rose person's account, the language and verbiage was different enough that Destiny could tell it was a different person. Unless his theory is now that Rose made the content, Rose's BF was talking to Destiny on Discord, and Solo is a different person from the BF that got access to the account.

Best-case scenario here for Destiny is he was jerking off to CSAM while sexting with a dude in the UK. It doesn't make him look any better. In truth, that Rose person (assuming she even said what Destiny is alleging) was probably just lying trying to minimize her role in this whole situation.

 

[Bert killed Ernie. Why?]

Yesssss the funniest timeline is on the table. The funniest timeline is that Solo was 17, too, and instead of sexting a 17 year old girl, he was sexting a 17 year old boy who is posing as a 17 year old girl. And he'll use this to rehabilitate his image. I doubt he was 17 though.

The second best option is Destiny helped stop a monstrous sex trafficker and will try to take credit for it when he should be required to retweet this image:



I made the kiwi farmer the black guy because I know how much you guys hate racism.

 

[kendoubleyou]

It could be totally true. It's what they do on OnlyFans - the w*man makes the content but an Indian does all the DMing with subscribers. It doesn't make sense since Destiny claims he wasn't buying the CSAM, but was merely getting it for free, so I don't understand what anybody's motivations are supposed to be here.

However, when the story originally broke Destiny made it a point to say that when Solo talked to him on that Rose person's account, the language and verbiage was different enough that Destiny could tell it was a different person. Unless his theory is now that Rose made the content, Rose's BF was talking to Destiny on Discord, and Solo is a different person from the BF that got access to the account.

Best-case scenario here for Destiny is he was jerking off to CSAM while sexting with a dude in the UK. It doesn't make him look any better. In truth, that Rose person (assuming she even said what Destiny is alleging) was probably just lying trying to minimize her role in this whole situation.

That's not a catfish though right? He's still interacting with a 17 yr old sexually, just slightly indirect. As in, Rose and Epstiny were still interfacing with eachother, even through a middleman.

 

[wood tiger]

ARE WE JUST IGNORING THAT SHE HAS A PICTURE IN HIS MERCH? THIS IS JUST BLATANT SANDWORM BULLSHIT.

OF COURSE THIS IS THE STORY THEY GO WITH, IT ABSOLVED HER OF GUILT OF BEING AN ONLINE WHORE AND DESTINY CAN USE IT AS SOME RETARD-TIER DEFLECTION AGAINST THE PEDO ACCUSATIONS.

I've tended to view it that she was a whore from the start. Unless it was doctored implying she was 18 in that screenshot when selling herself digitally.

Imo it's always creepy when an adult male interacts with someone in such ways considerably younger. Personally feeling the age should be consistent in all states at 18. Even then most 18 year Olds are not emotionally regulated to be in sexual relations so selling herself at 17 for who knows how long digitally for money attention or validations tends to imply alot about her personal image to be a child care worker within a church later. The I found Jesus arc of the reformed whore?

The age of consent is 17 there so a gross but fine line in their interactions with his age.

What crossed the line obviously is sharing shit with another person to build intimacy when the intimacy problems of his current relationship and thinking a almost legal child was a sounding board that could offer anything substantial beyond the thirst traps and fan whoring to say they were with destiny.
What furthered that crossing and the case is sharing media as was done. Yet in the poly lifestyle cultivated and maintained I feel often that these people all exchanged such videos casually among themselves. I'll give her that pxie in cultivating the good girl image most took her for stated she didn't want it known they were intimate/dating in his poly rotation to paraphrase. Yet when I first watched him and would see her assumed she was an established fuck friend in it, I think like a week later was her denial of being with him leaked back then. Which means others picked up that vibe they were fucking too.

I wonder in the poly sharing of themselves and videos is she actually mad the video was leaked or that the case is retaliation in being shown to have lied. And damage control to victimize herself. The others were digitally selling themselves as well and in the poly sharing. So is their now rebuttal into victimization in never unlike pixe denying being sexual with him but his unwillingness to continue? As watching him I tended to think in his anxiety or paranoia his often joking admission of recording wasn't something that should be ignored. But these people claim he secretly recorded them together when he often made a point to say he recorded shit for when people changed up the narratives to protect himself. So the grinder hook up in that seems like hooking up with stranger and doing something stupid protecting himself if shit went sideways.

So while I've always considered him an idiot sharing intimate content from his collection. He's an autistic idiot who the sharing of content was normalized between each other as performance or preference styles and let's do that again meme, reminders of what we did inside the subtlety of social media posts.

 

[ERavenswood]

So now he's saying that he sent Pixie's intimate video to someone he knew so little about that he didn't even know it was a man? Then he was being even more negligent with these videos than we thought.

 

[Pippa is a spic whore]

• In his original declaration, Peña claimed Bonnell’s Discord export was “tampered with,” that messages were deleted/altered, and that the chat log was unreliable.
• In the amended declaration, Peña withdraws those accusations, acknowledging that the supposed inconsistencies are explained by Discord’s time-grouping interface and not by any manipulation.

I love the subtle detail here (he even shits the bed a bit later by mentioning the hash anyway, since Abby is still living and breathing and has not publically dropped out yet, and she is the one where the hash presence becomes important)
Just to walk you through what he basically said, with a counterargument that Joan is free to use if she ever decides to stoop to their level:

>"THE DEFENDANT HAS STATED TO PLAINTIFF THAT HE KNEW ROSE VERY WELL, AND THAT SHE AND HIM WERE 'CLOSE', and that he didn't send the video to multiple women in 2023 and 2024, after CARDII".

>"HOWEVER, HE LATER DROPPED THESE CLAIMS, ADMITTING THAT HE DID NOT KNOW ROSE VERY WELL, REFERING TO HER AS 'THAT ROSE PERSON'."

The implication is that Jesus went back and said "nah my bad, this glorified .txt file where the nigga we are suing investigated himself and found no wrongdoing is 100% legit and should be taken as fact." He didn't.
Your edibles ain't shit, esteban. You have no way of proving you didn't tamper with the evidence (because of course you did, and you are counting on the whole judicial system being tech illiterate).
As far as the disclosure argument goes, its up to the judge to make a ruling on it so no new memes there. I do find the mental image of a fat britishman in fishnet stockings taking a picture inside a random chicago university, trying to bait destiny. I am sure it was actually solo (who ofc is of age, cisgender and loves gothic bad boys that smell good) who is getting fucked in those videos, too.