Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Just watching footage of Trump trying to dance along with Saudi Arabians.

This is the future I was promised.

(This was of course AFTER they put "the collar of Al Saud" around his neck. Which is awesome.)
 
Última edición por un moderador:
@Coconut Gun THey'll have to lose at least one more time before they give up, anything can happen ONCE as an aberration, it has to happen again to be a pattern.

That's about how long it took the religious right to lose their toxic influence on the RNC as they tumbled from dominance in the late 80's to total irrelevance aside from those unlucky few who shared a congressional district with Pat Buchanan : it took about a decade for the message to trickle up to the leadership which just could NOT believe that average everyday citizens just weren't listening to their moral superiors.
 
Apparently Twitter helped elect Trump and they're very sorry for it.

IMG_6863.jpg
IMG_6862.jpg

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/33...-platforms-role-in-making-trump-president?amp
 

Sorry Dobby, no can do. Twitter doesn't want to risk the right wing machine taking them to court on a 1st amendment platorm suit. Which even the ACLU would have to defend him on, as much as it makes them puke, or they look like hypocrites.

In other words, Dobby... If you can autisically screech, then Trump can say what he wants on there too.
 
Let's give the "cuck" thing a rest.

It's pretty pathetic.

It's overused, but it has a great deal of emotional power as it encapsulates everything that's wrong with modern conservatives: they're controlled opposition so dead set on "fighting clean" and winning the approval of their enemies that they'll roll over and get a boner every time liberals wipe their ass on the Constitution or discover some heretofore unknown "right" to have their hedonism subsidized by the US Taxpayer. Just like a cuckold shows disdain for his wife by pushing her to have sex with dangerous men just so he can sit in the corner, watch, and seek atonement for being the filthy, useless scumbag that he knows he is, Cuck politicians show disdain for their non-elite constituencies by flooding their homelands with swarthy, single male sub-Saharans, (some of whom have a rather creative interpretation of the word, "consent." ) The word "Cuck" is a rhetorical bullet that reminds these tailored-suited Judases of their treachery, and all throughout the election, it made them squeal like no other label could. It should not be laid to rest frivolously.
 
t's overused, but it has a great deal of emotional power as it encapsulates everything that's wrong with modern conservatives: they're controlled opposition so dead set on "fighting clean" and winning the approval of their enemies that they'll roll over and get a boner every time liberals wipe their ass on the Constitution or discover some heretofore unknown "right" to have their hedonism subsidized by the US Taxpayer. Just like a cuckold shows disdain for his wife by pushing her to have sex with dangerous men just so he can sit in the corner, watch, and seek atonement for being the filthy, useless scumbag that he knows he is, Cuck politicians show disdain for their non-elite constituencies by flooding their homelands with swarthy, single male sub-Saharans, (some of whom have a rather creative interpretation of the word, "consent." ) The word "Cuck" is a rhetorical bullet that reminds these tailored-suited Judases of their treachery, and all throughout the election, it made them squeal like no other label could. It should not be laid to rest frivolously.
lol calm down. cuck.
 
Sorry Dobby, no can do. Twitter doesn't want to risk the right wing machine taking them to court on a 1st amendment platorm suit.

Not really. They can kick off anyone they like for any reason or no reason at all.

It would be economic suicide, but they could do it entirely legally.
 
Tech companies and their executives have bigger delusions of grandeur than schizos who think they're Napoleon, I swear.
 
The First Amendment is an incredible and immensely powerful piece of legislation, but it doesn't work the way most folk think it works.
 
It's overused, but it has a great deal of emotional power as it encapsulates everything that's wrong with modern conservatives: they're controlled opposition so dead set on "fighting clean" and winning the approval of their enemies that they'll roll over and get a boner every time liberals wipe their ass on the Constitution or discover some heretofore unknown "right" to have their hedonism subsidized by the US Taxpayer. Just like a cuckold shows disdain for his wife by pushing her to have sex with dangerous men just so he can sit in the corner, watch, and seek atonement for being the filthy, useless scumbag that he knows he is, Cuck politicians show disdain for their non-elite constituencies by flooding their homelands with swarthy, single male sub-Saharans, (some of whom have a rather creative interpretation of the word, "consent." ) The word "Cuck" is a rhetorical bullet that reminds these tailored-suited Judases of their treachery, and all throughout the election, it made them squeal like no other label could. It should not be laid to rest frivolously.
Lol change republican for democrat and I swear I read this post verbatim multiple times over the past few years.

Edit, are you guys mad I didn't state I was using hyperbole? It's the sentiment that's the same - leftists claim democrats are too soft and lenient, right wingers claim the same of republicans.
 
Última edición:
Why is Colbert doing a bit on Alex Jones now? It doesn't make any sense for him to do it at all, it's like when Clinton made that speech mentioning alt-right, all it did was give unaware people an introduction to them and probably actually helped the alt-right gain a bit of oxygen and momentum after all those dumb articles were posted about them. Mocking Alex Jones is pretty much the same thing, elevating an ideological enemy to make it seem waaaay more powerful and influential than it actually is and opening the gates for ordinary people to start doing a bit of research in their own time, inevitably all this will do is help out people associated with Alex Jones like that Paul Watson guy.

I just don't see how Colbert and the people involved in making the show can think it's a good idea, when he was mocking O' Reilly he was mocking a mainstream household name not a guy with a radio show and a youtube channel that maybe 10% of the population know anything about.

This is beyond dumb for Colbert from just about every possible angle and worst of all the skit isn't even funny, it's absolute trash.
 
Lol change republican for democrat and I swear I read this post verbatim multiple times over the past few years.

Edit, are you guys mad I didn't state I was using hyperbole? It's the sentiment that's the same - leftists claim democrats are too soft and lenient, right wingers claim the same of republicans.

Sorry. I forgot I was on Kiwifarms. I must've thought I was at MPC.com. (It was late, I was drunk, etc...) I'll try to remember the rules from now on.

Why is Colbert doing a bit on Alex Jones now? It doesn't make any sense for him to do it at all, it's like when Clinton made that speech mentioning alt-right, all it did was give unaware people an introduction to them and probably actually helped the alt-right gain a bit of oxygen and momentum after all those dumb articles were posted about them. Mocking Alex Jones is pretty much the same thing, elevating an ideological enemy to make it seem waaaay more powerful and influential than it actually is and opening the gates for ordinary people to start doing a bit of research in their own time, inevitably all this will do is help out people associated with Alex Jones like that Paul Watson guy.

I just don't see how Colbert and the people involved in making the show can think it's a good idea, when he was mocking O' Reilly he was mocking a mainstream household name not a guy with a radio show and a youtube channel that maybe 10% of the population know anything about.

This is beyond dumb for Colbert from just about every possible angle and worst of all the skit isn't even funny, it's absolute trash.

As a partisan goon myself, I can attest that most of what my fellow goons on both sides do and say is motivated by their psychology , solipsism and instincts, not by logic, reason and foresight. It makes sense to an ideologue to paint their enemies as a boogeyman who must be stopped at all costs - that's the kind of language most likely to motivate their base of samethinkers. Stepping outside of your head and imagining what a third party might think is a difficult task for zealots (even semi-self-aware ones...)
 
Última edición:
Trump's speech at Saudi Arabia is "un-American".
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...saudi-arabia/?utm_term=.90f6a0b580fc#comments

Trump is like the Saudis.
Ver archivo adjunto 223267
If Obama made this speech, no one would care.

The shit is this? Hasn't the left been hysterically insisting that the Muslim world is totally tolerant and feminist and that anyone who disagrees is a Nazi for like a decade now? Hell didn't they criticize trump for allegedly being mean to Muslims?

Fucking amazing, all it took for sjws to start hating Muslims was trump shaking hands with one. Anyone want to take bets on who will be the next victim class that can do no wrong now that Muslims are apparently the allies of meanie man Trump?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo